The effect of eye movement desensitization on neurocognitive functioning compared to retrieval-only in PTSD patients: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06420-9
Eka Susanty, Marit Sijbrandij, Wilis Srisayekti, Yusep Suparman, Anja C Huizink
{"title":"The effect of eye movement desensitization on neurocognitive functioning compared to retrieval-only in PTSD patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Eka Susanty, Marit Sijbrandij, Wilis Srisayekti, Yusep Suparman, Anja C Huizink","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06420-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is robust evidence that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with neurocognitive deficits, such as executive dysfunction or memory dysfunction. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an evidence-based treatment for PTSD, in which eye movements (EMs) are performed during traumatic memory retrieval. We examined whether Eye Movement Desensitization (EMD) improves neurocognitive functioning in PTSD patients, in comparison with a retrieval-only control condition without EMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with PTSD (N = 91) were randomized into EMD (N = 47) or retrieval-only (N = 44). Data were collected at baseline (T0), one-week post-treatment (T1), one-month follow-up (T2), and at three-month follow-up (T3). Outcome measures were the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), the Trail Making Test (TMT), and the Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV). We conducted linear mixed model to analyse the main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a main effect of time, indicating improvements for both the EMD and retrieval-only groups in CVLT scores, TMT A, TMT B and Digit Span score of WAIS-IV (Bonferroni-adjusted p's < 0.001) from T0 to T3. There were no effects of group (p = .64) or group by time on CVLT total trial A (T3; p = .34), delay A (T3; p = .76), TMT A (T3; p = .61), TMT B (T3: p = .58), and Digit Span scores (T3; p = .78) of the WAIS-IV, indicating no significant differences between groups on any of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparing EMD and retrieval-only did not show evidence for additive effects of EMs on the treatment of PTSD in terms of improvements in neurocognitive functioning. Thus, treatments based on retrieval of traumatic memories may be used to improve neurocognitive functioning in patients with PTSD.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered 19/12/2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [ISRCTN55239132].</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"956"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06420-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is robust evidence that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with neurocognitive deficits, such as executive dysfunction or memory dysfunction. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an evidence-based treatment for PTSD, in which eye movements (EMs) are performed during traumatic memory retrieval. We examined whether Eye Movement Desensitization (EMD) improves neurocognitive functioning in PTSD patients, in comparison with a retrieval-only control condition without EMs.

Methods: Adult patients with PTSD (N = 91) were randomized into EMD (N = 47) or retrieval-only (N = 44). Data were collected at baseline (T0), one-week post-treatment (T1), one-month follow-up (T2), and at three-month follow-up (T3). Outcome measures were the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), the Trail Making Test (TMT), and the Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale fourth edition (WAIS-IV). We conducted linear mixed model to analyse the main outcomes.

Results: There was a main effect of time, indicating improvements for both the EMD and retrieval-only groups in CVLT scores, TMT A, TMT B and Digit Span score of WAIS-IV (Bonferroni-adjusted p's < 0.001) from T0 to T3. There were no effects of group (p = .64) or group by time on CVLT total trial A (T3; p = .34), delay A (T3; p = .76), TMT A (T3; p = .61), TMT B (T3: p = .58), and Digit Span scores (T3; p = .78) of the WAIS-IV, indicating no significant differences between groups on any of the outcomes.

Conclusion: Comparing EMD and retrieval-only did not show evidence for additive effects of EMs on the treatment of PTSD in terms of improvements in neurocognitive functioning. Thus, treatments based on retrieval of traumatic memories may be used to improve neurocognitive functioning in patients with PTSD.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered 19/12/2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [ISRCTN55239132].

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼动脱敏对PTSD患者神经认知功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:有强有力的证据表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与神经认知缺陷有关,如执行功能障碍或记忆功能障碍。眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)是一种基于证据的创伤后应激障碍治疗方法,在创伤记忆提取过程中进行眼动(EMs)。我们研究了眼动脱敏(EMD)是否能改善创伤后应激障碍患者的神经认知功能,与没有EMD的仅检索对照条件相比。方法:91例成年PTSD患者随机分为EMD组(N = 47)和单纯检索组(N = 44)。在基线(T0)、治疗后1周(T1)、1个月随访(T2)和3个月随访(T3)收集数据。结果测量采用加州言语学习测验(CVLT)、轨迹测验(TMT)和韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的数字广度子测验。采用线性混合模型对主要结果进行分析。结果:时间是主要影响因素,表明EMD组和单纯提取组在CVLT评分、TMT a、TMT B和WAIS-IV的数字广度评分方面均有改善(Bonferroni-adjusted p)。结论:比较EMD组和单纯提取组在神经认知功能改善方面没有证据表明EMD组对PTSD治疗有附加效应。因此,基于创伤记忆检索的治疗可能用于改善PTSD患者的神经认知功能。临床试验注册:该试验于2017年12月19日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符[ISRCTN55239132]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adolescents with depression. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based self-help skill strengthening (ISSS) intervention for secondary school teachers: a transdiagnostic intervention for common mental health problems. Generalized anxiety and loneliness among the general population in Saudi Arabia. Finding risk factors for dementia in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1