Reaching experts for enhanced referral (REFER) to pain psychology: a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers at a specialised center in the USA.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003020
Lea Schemer, Lauren E Harrison, Courtney W Hess, Alexandra J Neville, Nicole Jehl, Ryan S L Ma, Julia A Glombiewski, Laura E Simons
{"title":"Reaching experts for enhanced referral (REFER) to pain psychology: a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers at a specialised center in the USA.","authors":"Lea Schemer, Lauren E Harrison, Courtney W Hess, Alexandra J Neville, Nicole Jehl, Ryan S L Ma, Julia A Glombiewski, Laura E Simons","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To minimise the referral gap to pain psychology, the purpose of this study was to describe clinician-perceived patient suitability for pain psychology referral, develop a referral plan and outline essential elements of a referral conversation via a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a three-round modified Delphi approach consulting multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers (n=18) including physicians, psychologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists and nurse practitioners (PT, OT, NP). Based on the responses to an online survey (Round 1), initial statements regarding the pain psychology referral process were developed. These statements were revised in three separate panels (MD panel, PSY panel, PT, OT, NP panel; Round 2). A priori consensus criteria were verified for each statement within and between groups using anonymous responses to a concluding online survey (Round 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately one-third of the statements (35%) reached consensus across all panels. For example, paediatric pain providers agreed that referrals should be communicated verbally, along with written materials, and that pain should be explained early from a biopsychosocial perspective. Paediatric pain providers also suggested minimising barriers through a flexible, stepped-care approach that adapts the delivery of pain psychology beyond traditional models. However, most statements reached consensus in only one or two panels (52%), indicating a lack of consensus across disciplines. The data suggest that it was comparatively easier to reach an overall consensus on statements formulating an ideal referral process to pain psychology (50%) than on statements characterising patient suitability (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paediatric pain providers developed an actionable plan for pain psychology referrals. This plan could bridge referral gaps and improve access to pain psychology treatment. Given the low provider consensus on patient suitability, further research is warranted to understand pain psychology referral decision-making, including differing perceptions of patient suitability across disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To minimise the referral gap to pain psychology, the purpose of this study was to describe clinician-perceived patient suitability for pain psychology referral, develop a referral plan and outline essential elements of a referral conversation via a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers.

Methods: We employed a three-round modified Delphi approach consulting multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers (n=18) including physicians, psychologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists and nurse practitioners (PT, OT, NP). Based on the responses to an online survey (Round 1), initial statements regarding the pain psychology referral process were developed. These statements were revised in three separate panels (MD panel, PSY panel, PT, OT, NP panel; Round 2). A priori consensus criteria were verified for each statement within and between groups using anonymous responses to a concluding online survey (Round 3).

Results: Approximately one-third of the statements (35%) reached consensus across all panels. For example, paediatric pain providers agreed that referrals should be communicated verbally, along with written materials, and that pain should be explained early from a biopsychosocial perspective. Paediatric pain providers also suggested minimising barriers through a flexible, stepped-care approach that adapts the delivery of pain psychology beyond traditional models. However, most statements reached consensus in only one or two panels (52%), indicating a lack of consensus across disciplines. The data suggest that it was comparatively easier to reach an overall consensus on statements formulating an ideal referral process to pain psychology (50%) than on statements characterising patient suitability (13%).

Conclusions: Paediatric pain providers developed an actionable plan for pain psychology referrals. This plan could bridge referral gaps and improve access to pain psychology treatment. Given the low provider consensus on patient suitability, further research is warranted to understand pain psychology referral decision-making, including differing perceptions of patient suitability across disciplines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达到专家加强转诊(参考)疼痛心理学:修改德尔福方法与多学科儿科疼痛提供者在美国一个专门的中心。
背景:为了最大限度地减少对疼痛心理学的转诊差距,本研究的目的是描述临床医生认为患者对疼痛心理学转诊的适应性,制定转诊计划,并通过与多学科儿科疼痛提供者的改进德尔菲方法概述转诊对话的基本要素。方法:我们采用三轮改进德尔菲法咨询多学科儿科疼痛提供者(n=18),包括医生、心理学家、物理治疗师、职业治疗师和执业护士(PT、OT、NP)。基于对在线调查的回应(第一轮),关于疼痛心理学转诊过程的初步陈述被开发出来。这些陈述在三个单独的小组中进行修订(MD小组,PSY小组,PT, OT, NP小组;第2轮)。通过对结论性在线调查的匿名回复,对小组内部和小组之间的每个陈述验证了先验的共识标准(第3轮)。结果:大约三分之一的陈述(35%)在所有小组中达成了共识。例如,儿科疼痛提供者同意转诊应与书面材料一起口头沟通,并且应从生物心理社会角度尽早解释疼痛。儿科疼痛提供者还建议通过灵活的、逐步的护理方法来最大限度地减少障碍,这种方法可以适应超越传统模式的疼痛心理学的传递。然而,大多数陈述仅在一两个小组中达成共识(52%),这表明缺乏跨学科的共识。数据表明,相对而言,在表述一个理想的转诊过程到疼痛心理学(50%)上达成总体共识比在描述患者适合性(13%)上达成共识要容易得多。结论:儿科疼痛提供者为疼痛心理学转诊制定了可操作的计划。这个计划可以弥合转诊差距,提高获得疼痛心理治疗的机会。鉴于提供者对患者适应性的低共识,进一步的研究是必要的,以了解疼痛心理学转诊决策,包括不同学科对患者适应性的不同看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Dexmedetomidine in neonates: utilisation trends and safety profile over time in a neonatal intensive care unit. Exploring the current usage of and attitudes towards transanastomotic tube (TAT) feeding in infants born with duodenal atresia: a survey of practice in the UK. The impact of climate change on child nutrition in Indonesia: a conceptual framework and scoping review of the available evidence. Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory. Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1