Prognostic implications of increased and final quantitative flow ratios in patients treated with drug-coated balloons physiological evaluation after DCB in de novo lesions.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04413-w
Li Lin, Yaodong Ding, Yida Tang, Guisong Wang, Guosheng Fu, Lefeng Wang, Lianglong Chen, Xi Liu, Bin Liu, Hui Chen, Gang Liu, Qiang Tang, Yong Zeng
{"title":"Prognostic implications of increased and final quantitative flow ratios in patients treated with drug-coated balloons physiological evaluation after DCB in de novo lesions.","authors":"Li Lin, Yaodong Ding, Yida Tang, Guisong Wang, Guosheng Fu, Lefeng Wang, Lianglong Chen, Xi Liu, Bin Liu, Hui Chen, Gang Liu, Qiang Tang, Yong Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04413-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies investigated the implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR (absolute increase of QFR) in de novo lesions of small coronary disease after drug-coated balloon (DCB).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR in patients who received DCB only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff value of the post-PCI QFR and the post-PCI ΔQFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff values of QFR and ΔQFR for the MACE rate were 0.86 and 0.57, respectively. There were 175 patients (61.2%) with a high QFR (≥ 0.86) and 113 patients (39.5%) with a high ΔQFR (≥ 0.57) after PCI. The MACE rate was significantly higher in patients with a low QFR compared to a high QFR (5.7% vs. 27.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.632, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872 to 7.044, P < 0.001). The MACE rate was higher in patients with a low ΔQFR increase compared to those with high ΔQFR (4.4% vs. 20.2%, HR: 4.700, 95%CI: 2.430 to 9.089, P = 0.001). In multivariable model, a low post-PCI QFR and a low post-PCI ΔQFR was independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR: 4.071, 95%CI: 2.037 to 8.135, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After DCB in de novo lesions of small coronary disease, both post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR showed similar prognostic implications in MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04413-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies investigated the implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR (absolute increase of QFR) in de novo lesions of small coronary disease after drug-coated balloon (DCB).

Objectives: We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR in patients who received DCB only.

Methods: Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff value of the post-PCI QFR and the post-PCI ΔQFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI).

Results: The optimal cutoff values of QFR and ΔQFR for the MACE rate were 0.86 and 0.57, respectively. There were 175 patients (61.2%) with a high QFR (≥ 0.86) and 113 patients (39.5%) with a high ΔQFR (≥ 0.57) after PCI. The MACE rate was significantly higher in patients with a low QFR compared to a high QFR (5.7% vs. 27.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.632, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872 to 7.044, P < 0.001). The MACE rate was higher in patients with a low ΔQFR increase compared to those with high ΔQFR (4.4% vs. 20.2%, HR: 4.700, 95%CI: 2.430 to 9.089, P = 0.001). In multivariable model, a low post-PCI QFR and a low post-PCI ΔQFR was independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR: 4.071, 95%CI: 2.037 to 8.135, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: After DCB in de novo lesions of small coronary disease, both post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR showed similar prognostic implications in MACE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension and associated factors among rheumatic heart disease patients in Ethiopia. Prevalence and predictors of left atrial thrombus in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery: a cross-sectional study. WATCHMAN versus LACbes® device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: a single-center, propensity-matched study. Bioinformatics analysis of ferroptosis-related hub genes and immunoinfiltration in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion following heart transplantation. Comparison of diaphragmatic breathing exercises and incentive spirometry on the functional status of heart failure patients: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1