Self-monitoring of blood pressure following a stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TASMIN5S): a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04320-0
R J McManus, A Smith, E Temple, L M Yu, J Allen, R Doogue, G A Ford, L Glynn, B Guthrie, P Hall, L Hinton, F D R Hobbs, J Mant, B McKinstry, G Mead, K Morton, T Rai, C Rice, C Roman, A Stoddart, L Tarassenko, C Velardo, M Williams, L Yardley
{"title":"Self-monitoring of blood pressure following a stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TASMIN5S): a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"R J McManus, A Smith, E Temple, L M Yu, J Allen, R Doogue, G A Ford, L Glynn, B Guthrie, P Hall, L Hinton, F D R Hobbs, J Mant, B McKinstry, G Mead, K Morton, T Rai, C Rice, C Roman, A Stoddart, L Tarassenko, C Velardo, M Williams, L Yardley","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04320-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) control following stroke is important but currently sub-optimal. This trial aimed to determine whether self-monitoring of hypertension with telemonitoring and a treatment escalation protocol, results in lower BP than usual care in people with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unblinded randomised controlled trial, comparing a BP telemonitoring-based intervention with control (usual care) for hypertension management in 12 primary care practices in England. People with previous stroke or TIA with clinic systolic BP 130-180 mmHg, taking ≤ 3 antihypertensive medications and on stable treatment for at least four weeks were randomised 1:1 using secure online system to intervention or control. The BP:Together intervention comprised self-monitoring of blood pressure with a digital behavioural intervention which supported telemonitoring of self-monitored BP with feedback to clinicians and patients regarding medication titration. The planned primary outcome was difference in clinic measured systolic BP 12 months from randomisation but was not available following early study termination due to withdrawal of funding during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, in addition to pre-randomised data, routinely recorded BP was extracted from electronic patient records both pre- and post-randomisation and presented descriptively only. An intention to treat approach was taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 650 postal invitations, 129 (20%) responded, of whom 95 people had been screened for eligibility prior to the pandemic (November 2019-March 2020) and 55 (58%) were randomised. Pre-randomisation routinely recorded mean BP was 145/78 mmHg in the control (n = 26) and 145/79 mmHg in the self-monitoring (n = 21) groups. Post-randomisation mean BP was 134/73 mmHg in the control (n = 19) and 130/75 mmHg in the self-monitoring (n = 25) groups. Participants randomised to self-monitoring used the intervention for ≥ 7 months in 25/27 (93%) of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruitment of people with stroke/TIA to a trial comparing a BP self-monitoring and digital behavioural intervention to usual care was feasible prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the vast majority of those randomised to intervention used it while the trial was running. Routinely recorded blood pressure control improved in both groups. Digital interventions including self-monitoring are feasible for people with stroke/TIA and should be definitively evaluated in future trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN57946500 06/09/2019 Prospective.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04320-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure (BP) control following stroke is important but currently sub-optimal. This trial aimed to determine whether self-monitoring of hypertension with telemonitoring and a treatment escalation protocol, results in lower BP than usual care in people with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

Methods: Unblinded randomised controlled trial, comparing a BP telemonitoring-based intervention with control (usual care) for hypertension management in 12 primary care practices in England. People with previous stroke or TIA with clinic systolic BP 130-180 mmHg, taking ≤ 3 antihypertensive medications and on stable treatment for at least four weeks were randomised 1:1 using secure online system to intervention or control. The BP:Together intervention comprised self-monitoring of blood pressure with a digital behavioural intervention which supported telemonitoring of self-monitored BP with feedback to clinicians and patients regarding medication titration. The planned primary outcome was difference in clinic measured systolic BP 12 months from randomisation but was not available following early study termination due to withdrawal of funding during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, in addition to pre-randomised data, routinely recorded BP was extracted from electronic patient records both pre- and post-randomisation and presented descriptively only. An intention to treat approach was taken.

Results: From 650 postal invitations, 129 (20%) responded, of whom 95 people had been screened for eligibility prior to the pandemic (November 2019-March 2020) and 55 (58%) were randomised. Pre-randomisation routinely recorded mean BP was 145/78 mmHg in the control (n = 26) and 145/79 mmHg in the self-monitoring (n = 21) groups. Post-randomisation mean BP was 134/73 mmHg in the control (n = 19) and 130/75 mmHg in the self-monitoring (n = 25) groups. Participants randomised to self-monitoring used the intervention for ≥ 7 months in 25/27 (93%) of cases.

Conclusions: Recruitment of people with stroke/TIA to a trial comparing a BP self-monitoring and digital behavioural intervention to usual care was feasible prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the vast majority of those randomised to intervention used it while the trial was running. Routinely recorded blood pressure control improved in both groups. Digital interventions including self-monitoring are feasible for people with stroke/TIA and should be definitively evaluated in future trials.

Trial registration: ISRCTN57946500 06/09/2019 Prospective.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卒中或短暂性缺血发作后的自我血压监测(TASMIN5S):一项随机对照试验
背景:卒中后血压(BP)控制很重要,但目前尚不理想。本试验旨在确定在有过卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者中,采用远程监测和治疗升级方案进行高血压自我监测是否能使血压低于常规治疗。方法:非盲随机对照试验,比较英国12个初级保健实践中基于血压远程监测的高血压管理干预与对照(常规护理)。既往卒中或TIA患者,临床收缩压130-180 mmHg,服用≤3种降压药物且稳定治疗至少4周,采用安全在线系统1:1随机分为干预组或对照组。血压:联合干预包括自我监测血压和数字行为干预,支持远程监测自我监测血压,并向临床医生和患者反馈药物滴定。计划的主要结局是随机分组后12个月临床测量的收缩压差异,但由于COVID-19大流行期间资金撤回,研究早期终止,因此无法获得。相反,除了预随机数据外,常规记录的血压从随机化前后的电子病历中提取,并仅描述性地呈现。采取意向治疗方法。结果:在650份邮寄邀请中,129人(20%)做出了回应,其中95人在大流行之前(2019年11月- 2020年3月)进行了资格筛选,55人(58%)是随机抽取的。随机化前常规记录的平均血压在对照组(n = 26)为145/78 mmHg,在自我监测组(n = 21)为145/79 mmHg。随机化后,对照组(n = 19)的平均血压为134/73 mmHg,自我监测组(n = 25)的平均血压为130/75 mmHg。在25/27(93%)的病例中,随机分配到自我监测组的参与者使用干预措施≥7个月。结论:在COVID-19大流行之前,招募卒中/TIA患者参加一项比较血压自我监测和数字行为干预与常规护理的试验是可行的,并且绝大多数被随机分配到干预组的患者在试验进行期间使用了干预。常规记录的血压控制在两组中都有所改善。包括自我监测在内的数字干预措施对中风/TIA患者是可行的,应在未来的试验中进行明确评估。试验注册:ISRCTN57946500 06/09/2019前瞻性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Associations between metabolic obesity phenotypes and incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and elderly Chinese individuals. Assessment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain and echocardiographic changes before and after PCI in Vietnamese patients with stable angina - a single center study. Machine learning predicts ICU mortality in cardiogenic shock: interpreting SOFA, lactate, and pH thresholds. Association between blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio and 28-day mortality of acute heart failure in intensive care unit: analysis based on MIMIC-IV database. Factors associated with a complicated hospital course in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a report of the iSCAD registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1