Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large Rehabilitation Center in Germany

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY Cancer reports Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70092
Lukas Püllen, Max Naumann, Ulrich Krafft, Felix Püllen, Osama Mahmoud, Mulham Al-Nader, Christopher Darr, Hendrik Borgmann, Christoph Briel, Boris Hadaschik, Johannes Salem, Timur Kuru
{"title":"Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large Rehabilitation Center in Germany","authors":"Lukas Püllen,&nbsp;Max Naumann,&nbsp;Ulrich Krafft,&nbsp;Felix Püllen,&nbsp;Osama Mahmoud,&nbsp;Mulham Al-Nader,&nbsp;Christopher Darr,&nbsp;Hendrik Borgmann,&nbsp;Christoph Briel,&nbsp;Boris Hadaschik,&nbsp;Johannes Salem,&nbsp;Timur Kuru","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite constant improvements, incontinence is one of the most relevant and quality-of-life-reducing side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) and, in addition to patient-specific factors such as age, the experience of the surgeon/center and the surgical technique used play an important role.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To present current real-world data on short-term incontinence after RP from one of the largest German rehabilitation centers in 2022 and to compare it to the results from the same institution in 2016.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective, unicentric, univariate analysis of data from 1394 men after RP in 2022 on admission and discharge from the rehabilitation clinic. Incontinence defined as ≥ 1 pad/day was evaluated by quantitative measuring all day incontinence under a defined graduation and compared to the results of 2016. Totally, 1393 men were available for analysis in 2022 compared to 1390 in 2016. Median age for both cohorts was 66 years with minor differences in preoperative PSA levels. Despite different surgical approaches, no significant change in short-term incontinence rates in 2016 and 2022 were noted at discharge (76.9% vs. 77.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.56). A notable increase in patients with ISUP grade Group 2 and a shift towards robotic surgery were observed in 2022 (45.5%–71%). While nerve sparing led to a significant improvement in continence (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), lymphadenectomy and T-stage were not related to any significant increase in short-term incontinence rates. Comparing age groups within the cohort, patients &gt; 69 years exhibited the highest risk of short-term incontinence and least likelihood of regaining continence during rehabilitation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Men treated at a certified prostate cancer center had significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) lower short-term incontinence rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study shows little improvement in short-term postoperative incontinence rates after RP in Germany in the last 6 years and known risk factors for postoperative incontinence like age, nerve-sparing surgery, and level of experience were reproduced in our analyses. We conclude not only to carefully select but also to counsel patients before being treated for prostate cancer and to strongly advice treatment at certified centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite constant improvements, incontinence is one of the most relevant and quality-of-life-reducing side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) and, in addition to patient-specific factors such as age, the experience of the surgeon/center and the surgical technique used play an important role.

Aims

To present current real-world data on short-term incontinence after RP from one of the largest German rehabilitation centers in 2022 and to compare it to the results from the same institution in 2016.

Methods and Results

Retrospective, unicentric, univariate analysis of data from 1394 men after RP in 2022 on admission and discharge from the rehabilitation clinic. Incontinence defined as ≥ 1 pad/day was evaluated by quantitative measuring all day incontinence under a defined graduation and compared to the results of 2016. Totally, 1393 men were available for analysis in 2022 compared to 1390 in 2016. Median age for both cohorts was 66 years with minor differences in preoperative PSA levels. Despite different surgical approaches, no significant change in short-term incontinence rates in 2016 and 2022 were noted at discharge (76.9% vs. 77.9%, p = 0.56). A notable increase in patients with ISUP grade Group 2 and a shift towards robotic surgery were observed in 2022 (45.5%–71%). While nerve sparing led to a significant improvement in continence (p < 0.01), lymphadenectomy and T-stage were not related to any significant increase in short-term incontinence rates. Comparing age groups within the cohort, patients > 69 years exhibited the highest risk of short-term incontinence and least likelihood of regaining continence during rehabilitation (p < 0.01). Men treated at a certified prostate cancer center had significantly (p < 0.01) lower short-term incontinence rates.

Conclusion

Our study shows little improvement in short-term postoperative incontinence rates after RP in Germany in the last 6 years and known risk factors for postoperative incontinence like age, nerve-sparing surgery, and level of experience were reproduced in our analyses. We conclude not only to carefully select but also to counsel patients before being treated for prostate cancer and to strongly advice treatment at certified centers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽管2022年机器人手术的使用率高于2016年德国一家大型康复中心的实际结果,但根治性前列腺切除术后的短期尿失禁仍然取决于患者的年龄、神经保留方法和手术经验。
背景:尽管不断改善,尿失禁是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中最相关的和降低生活质量的副作用之一,除了患者的特定因素,如年龄,外科医生/中心的经验和所使用的手术技术也起着重要作用。目的:展示2022年德国最大的康复中心之一RP后短期尿失禁的当前真实数据,并将其与2016年同一机构的结果进行比较。方法与结果:回顾性、单中心、单变量分析2022年1394例男性RP患者入院和出院时的资料。以尿失禁≥1 pad/d为标准,定量测量确定毕业后的全天尿失禁情况,并与2016年的结果进行比较。2022年共有1393名男性可用于分析,而2016年为1390名。两组患者的中位年龄均为66岁,术前PSA水平差异较小。尽管手术方式不同,但2016年和2022年出院时短期尿失禁率没有显著变化(76.9%对77.9%,p = 0.56)。2022年,ISUP级第2组患者显著增加,转向机器人手术(45.5%-71%)。尽管神经保留导致了尿失禁的显著改善(p69),但术后短期尿失禁的风险最高,康复期间恢复尿失禁的可能性最小(p结论:我们的研究显示,在过去的6年里,德国RP术后短期尿失禁率几乎没有改善,我们的分析重现了已知的术后尿失禁的危险因素,如年龄、神经保留手术和经验水平。我们的结论是,不仅要仔细选择,而且要在前列腺癌治疗前对患者进行咨询,并强烈建议在认证中心进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of a Nomogram-Based Online Calculator for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients With Digestive Tract Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): An Analysis of the SEER Database Investigate of LOC101928988 Regulatory Effect on the DAPK2 Transcription in Breast Tumors A Case Series and Literature Review on Zanubrutinib Therapy for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia Mechanisms of GPM6A in Malignant Tumors Distribution, Risk Factors and Epidemiological Trends of Pancreatic Cancer Across Countries’ Income Levels: A Comprehensive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1