Evaluation of the ETV success score and its predictive value in pediatric occlusive hydrocephalus: implications for patient counseling.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child's Nervous System Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7
Matthias Krause, Daniel Gräfe, Roman Metzger, Christoph J Griessenauer, Janina Gburek-Augustat
{"title":"Evaluation of the ETV success score and its predictive value in pediatric occlusive hydrocephalus: implications for patient counseling.","authors":"Matthias Krause, Daniel Gräfe, Roman Metzger, Christoph J Griessenauer, Janina Gburek-Augustat","doi":"10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) is a well-established treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus, particularly in cases of aqueductal stenosis. The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) is a predictive tool widely used to estimate the likelihood of ETV success based on factors like age. Its accuracy, especially in infants under 3 months, is still debated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study evaluates the age-dependency of ETV success in 54 pediatric patients compared to ETVSS predictions. Patients were divided into age and pathology groups according to Kulkarni. Success was defined according the ETVSS criteria. Minimum follow-up was 12 months and included MRI to demonstrate a flow void at the floor or the third ventricle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our institutional data revealed a higher overall success rate SR (88%) compared to the ETVSS-predicted rate of 73%. Despite small numbers within subgroups, especially in very young children < 1 month, the success rate was higher than predicted by ETVSS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results show significantly higher actual SR across all age groups compared to ETVSS predictions (p = 0.035) when selected and performed by an experienced physician. The age groups > 1 year had significantly higher SR close to 100% (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0038, respectively). This suggests that ETV may be underutilized, particularly in infants, where predicted success rates are pessimistic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETVSS is a useful tool for counseling of parents, but differences in institution-specific outcomes should not be neglected. Depending on that, physicians might opt in favor of ETV as primary treatment in occlusive hydrocephalus of very young children, counterbalancing risks and sequalae of VP-shunting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":"41 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) is a well-established treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus, particularly in cases of aqueductal stenosis. The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) is a predictive tool widely used to estimate the likelihood of ETV success based on factors like age. Its accuracy, especially in infants under 3 months, is still debated.

Patients and methods: This study evaluates the age-dependency of ETV success in 54 pediatric patients compared to ETVSS predictions. Patients were divided into age and pathology groups according to Kulkarni. Success was defined according the ETVSS criteria. Minimum follow-up was 12 months and included MRI to demonstrate a flow void at the floor or the third ventricle.

Results: Our institutional data revealed a higher overall success rate SR (88%) compared to the ETVSS-predicted rate of 73%. Despite small numbers within subgroups, especially in very young children < 1 month, the success rate was higher than predicted by ETVSS.

Discussion: Our results show significantly higher actual SR across all age groups compared to ETVSS predictions (p = 0.035) when selected and performed by an experienced physician. The age groups > 1 year had significantly higher SR close to 100% (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0038, respectively). This suggests that ETV may be underutilized, particularly in infants, where predicted success rates are pessimistic.

Conclusion: ETVSS is a useful tool for counseling of parents, but differences in institution-specific outcomes should not be neglected. Depending on that, physicians might opt in favor of ETV as primary treatment in occlusive hydrocephalus of very young children, counterbalancing risks and sequalae of VP-shunting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Conservative management of pediatric pineal cyst apoplexy: a case report and literature review. Correction: Technique and protocol for bedside neuroendoscopic lavage for post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus: technical note. Detailed analysis of cystic lesions in patients after open fetal repair and postnatal myelomeningocele closure. Management of neonatal cephalohematoma and ossified cephalhematoma -281 cases of personal 10-year experience. Cerebral cavernous malformation with associated Streptococcus pyogenes abscess in a child: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1