Accuracy of the Hounsfield Unit Values Measured by Implant Planning Software.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.3390/dj12120413
Koudai Nagata, Yusuke Kouzai, Keitaro Inaba, Manabu Fujii, Mihoko Atsumi, Katsuhiko Kimoto, Shinji Kuroda, Hiromasa Kawana
{"title":"Accuracy of the Hounsfield Unit Values Measured by Implant Planning Software.","authors":"Koudai Nagata, Yusuke Kouzai, Keitaro Inaba, Manabu Fujii, Mihoko Atsumi, Katsuhiko Kimoto, Shinji Kuroda, Hiromasa Kawana","doi":"10.3390/dj12120413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The measurement of Hounsfield units (HU) during implant treatment planning is important. Currently, various manufacturers' implant planning software programs offer HU capabilities; however, their accuracy remains unverified. In this study, we aimed to validate the accuracy of HU values measured by implant planning software programs. <b>Methods</b>: This study used one type of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), two types of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and four implant planning software packages. Three specimens were prepared for the evaluation of HUs, and the standard values of the HUs were measured. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data obtained from MDCT and CBCT were loaded into four implant planning software packages to measure the HU values. The HU and reference values of the four implant planning software programs obtained from MDCT and CBCT were compared. Additionally, the HU values between each implant planning software program were compared. <b>Results</b>: The HU values of the three specimens, as measured using the four implant planning software programs utilizing MDCT, did not exhibit a significant difference from the standard values. Conversely, those obtained from CBCT were significantly different. The measured HU values after the MDCT imaging of the specimens were not significantly different between the implant planning software programs; however, they differed after CBCT imaging. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results of this study indicate that it is not possible to measure HU values using CBCT with implant planning software programs. However, HU values can be measured by any implant planning software using MDCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The measurement of Hounsfield units (HU) during implant treatment planning is important. Currently, various manufacturers' implant planning software programs offer HU capabilities; however, their accuracy remains unverified. In this study, we aimed to validate the accuracy of HU values measured by implant planning software programs. Methods: This study used one type of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), two types of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and four implant planning software packages. Three specimens were prepared for the evaluation of HUs, and the standard values of the HUs were measured. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data obtained from MDCT and CBCT were loaded into four implant planning software packages to measure the HU values. The HU and reference values of the four implant planning software programs obtained from MDCT and CBCT were compared. Additionally, the HU values between each implant planning software program were compared. Results: The HU values of the three specimens, as measured using the four implant planning software programs utilizing MDCT, did not exhibit a significant difference from the standard values. Conversely, those obtained from CBCT were significantly different. The measured HU values after the MDCT imaging of the specimens were not significantly different between the implant planning software programs; however, they differed after CBCT imaging. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that it is not possible to measure HU values using CBCT with implant planning software programs. However, HU values can be measured by any implant planning software using MDCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体规划软件测量Hounsfield单位值的准确性。
背景:在种植体治疗计划中测量霍斯菲尔德单位(Hounsfield units, HU)非常重要。目前,各种制造商的植入规划软件程序提供HU功能;然而,其准确性尚未得到证实。在本研究中,我们旨在验证种植体规划软件程序测量的HU值的准确性。方法:本研究使用1种多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)、2种锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和4种种植规划软件包。制备3份标本进行溶血性毒菌评价,测定溶血性毒菌标准值。从MDCT和CBCT获得的医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)数据被加载到四个种植计划软件包中,以测量HU值。比较MDCT和CBCT获得的4种种植规划软件的HU值和参考值。此外,比较各种植体规划软件之间的HU值。结果:利用MDCT的四种种植规划软件程序测量的三个标本的HU值与标准值无显著差异。相反,CBCT获得的结果有显著差异。不同种植规划软件对标本进行MDCT成像后测得的HU值差异无统计学意义;然而,在CBCT成像后,它们有所不同。结论:本研究结果表明,使用CBCT与种植体计划软件程序测量HU值是不可能的。然而,HU值可以通过使用MDCT的任何种植规划软件来测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Disinfection Efficacy of Er: YAG Laser Light on Single-Species Candida Biofilms-An In Vitro Study. Antibacterial Efficacy of Benefect™ Botanical Disinfectant in Comparison with Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorohexidine Against Multiple Endodontic Pathogens: An Ex Vivo Study. Evaluating the Impact of Kefir Consumption on Dental Caries and Periodontal Disease: A Narrative Review. Guided Bone Regeneration Using Carbonated Apatite Granules and L-Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone Membranes: A Case Series and Histological Evaluation. Prognosis of Vital Teeth Involved in Large Cystic Lesions After a Surgical Intervention: A Longitudinal Ambidirectional Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1