Discrimination of benign, atypical, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1 - intraindividual comparison of positron emission computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract

Background: To intraindividually compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission computed tomography (F-18-FDG-PET/CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in a non-inferiority design for the discrimination of peripheral nerve sheath tumours as benign (BPNST), atypical (ANF), or malignant (MPNST) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

Results: In this prospective single-centre study, thirty-four NF1 patients (18 male; 30 ± 11 years) underwent F-18-FDG-PET/CT and multi-b-value DW-MRI (11 b-values 0 - 800 s/mm²) at 3T. Sixty-six lesions corresponding to 39 BPNST, 11 ANF, and 16 MPNST were evaluated. Two radiologists independently assessed the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean/min) as well as the ADC in areas of lowest signal intensity in each lesion (ADC_dark). The AUCs of DW-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT were compared to determine whether the ADC is non-inferior to SUV_max (non-inferiority margin equal to -10%). Follow-up of ≥ 24 months (BPNST) or histopathological evaluation (MPNST + ANF) served as diagnostic reference standard. Both SUV_max and ADC parameters demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC_SUVmax 94.0%; AUC_{ADCmean/min/dark} 91.6% / 90.1% / 92.5%). However, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for any of the three ADC parameters (lower limits of the confidence intervals of the difference between the AUC of ADC_{mean/min/dark} and SUV_max -12.9% / -14.5% / -11.6%). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both imaging techniques (Krippendorff's alpha all > 0.94).

Conclusions: Both PET/CT-derived SUV_max and MRI-derived ADC allow sensitive and non-invasive differentiation of benign and (pre)-malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Nevertheless, DW-MRI cannot be considered as non-inferior to F-18-FDG-PET/CT in this prospective single-centre study.