Addressing the role of surgery in brain tumour trials: A report from the neurosurgery committee of the EORTC brain tumour group.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-05 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115198
Johnny Duerinck, Philipp Karschnia, Marike Broekman, Jens Gempt, George E D Petrescu, Asgeir S Jakola, Rachel Grossman, Roland Goldbrunner, Michael D Jenkinson, Georg Widhalm, Marian Neidert, Thiebaud Picart, Caroline Quoilin, Thierry Gorlia, Emilie Le Rhun, Giuseppe Minniti, Matthias Preusser, Michael Weller
{"title":"Addressing the role of surgery in brain tumour trials: A report from the neurosurgery committee of the EORTC brain tumour group.","authors":"Johnny Duerinck, Philipp Karschnia, Marike Broekman, Jens Gempt, George E D Petrescu, Asgeir S Jakola, Rachel Grossman, Roland Goldbrunner, Michael D Jenkinson, Georg Widhalm, Marian Neidert, Thiebaud Picart, Caroline Quoilin, Thierry Gorlia, Emilie Le Rhun, Giuseppe Minniti, Matthias Preusser, Michael Weller","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Brain Tumor Group (BTG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conducts academic clinical trials and translational research to improve clinical management of patients with primary and secondary brain tumors. The EORTC BTG has traditionally played an important role in providing evidence and thus advancing the field, albeit with a main focus on radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy in gliomas. Although examples of well-designed neuro-oncological surgical trials can be found, evidence in surgical neuro-oncology predominantly includes data from uncontrolled prospective series or retrospective cohorts. By means of a thorough literature and EORTC database review, we demonstrate, firstly, that while the pathway of the neuro-oncology patient most often starts with neurosurgery, its several aspects have traditionally been poorly acknowledged in clinical trials in neuro-oncology. We also show that the definitions and methods of assessment vary greatly between studies, limiting generalizability. The newly established Neurosurgery Committee of the EORTC BTG aims to address this gap by increasing the number of prospective surgical trials, but also the involvement of neurosurgeons in clinical trial design, promoting standardized terminology for description of the surgical aspects, including extent of resection. We will also explore alternative trial designs when randomization is deemed difficult, as well as focus on defining surgical quality indicators that influence outcome. By addressing these challenges, the committee aims to enhance the quality of neurosurgical evidence in neuro-oncology and define optimal surgical methods and standards of care. This should ultimately improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with brain tumors through evidence-based surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"216 ","pages":"115198"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115198","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brain Tumor Group (BTG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conducts academic clinical trials and translational research to improve clinical management of patients with primary and secondary brain tumors. The EORTC BTG has traditionally played an important role in providing evidence and thus advancing the field, albeit with a main focus on radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy in gliomas. Although examples of well-designed neuro-oncological surgical trials can be found, evidence in surgical neuro-oncology predominantly includes data from uncontrolled prospective series or retrospective cohorts. By means of a thorough literature and EORTC database review, we demonstrate, firstly, that while the pathway of the neuro-oncology patient most often starts with neurosurgery, its several aspects have traditionally been poorly acknowledged in clinical trials in neuro-oncology. We also show that the definitions and methods of assessment vary greatly between studies, limiting generalizability. The newly established Neurosurgery Committee of the EORTC BTG aims to address this gap by increasing the number of prospective surgical trials, but also the involvement of neurosurgeons in clinical trial design, promoting standardized terminology for description of the surgical aspects, including extent of resection. We will also explore alternative trial designs when randomization is deemed difficult, as well as focus on defining surgical quality indicators that influence outcome. By addressing these challenges, the committee aims to enhance the quality of neurosurgical evidence in neuro-oncology and define optimal surgical methods and standards of care. This should ultimately improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with brain tumors through evidence-based surgical interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决手术在脑肿瘤试验中的作用:EORTC脑肿瘤组神经外科委员会的一份报告。
欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)的脑肿瘤组(BTG)开展学术临床试验和转化研究,以改善原发性和继发性脑肿瘤患者的临床管理。EORTC BTG传统上在提供证据方面发挥了重要作用,从而推动了该领域的发展,尽管主要侧重于胶质瘤的放疗和药物治疗。虽然可以找到设计良好的神经肿瘤学外科试验的例子,但外科神经肿瘤学的证据主要包括来自非受控前瞻性系列或回顾性队列的数据。通过全面的文献和EORTC数据库回顾,我们首先证明,虽然神经肿瘤患者的途径通常从神经外科开始,但其几个方面传统上在神经肿瘤临床试验中得到的认识很少。我们还表明,评估的定义和方法在研究之间差异很大,限制了通用性。新成立的EORTC BTG神经外科委员会旨在通过增加前瞻性手术试验的数量,以及神经外科医生参与临床试验设计,促进手术方面描述的标准化术语,包括切除程度,来解决这一差距。当随机化被认为是困难的时候,我们还将探讨替代试验设计,并将重点放在确定影响结果的手术质量指标上。通过解决这些挑战,委员会旨在提高神经肿瘤学神经外科证据的质量,并确定最佳的手术方法和护理标准。这将最终通过循证外科干预改善脑肿瘤患者的预后和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
期刊最新文献
A new treatment strategy for mid-low rectal cancer patients exhibiting a clinical complete or near-complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery --A multicenter prospective case-control clinical trial by MONT-R. Real life data of ONC201 (dordaviprone) in pediatric and adult H3K27-altered recurrent diffuse midline glioma: Results of an international academia-driven compassionate use program. Optimized monitoring for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced myocarditis using high-sensitivity troponin-T. The Winner and still champion: Nodule volume doubling times. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonists Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Cancer Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1