Comparison of different eGFR formulas to measured glomerular filtration rate using iohexol in children and adolescents with mild chronic kidney disease.
Sonja Golob Jančič, Janez Klavž, Martina Filipič, Mirjam Močnik, Nataša Marčun Varda
{"title":"Comparison of different eGFR formulas to measured glomerular filtration rate using iohexol in children and adolescents with mild chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Sonja Golob Jančič, Janez Klavž, Martina Filipič, Mirjam Močnik, Nataša Marčun Varda","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05937-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on different formulas is commonly used as a bedside tool to assess kidney function in children and young adults. The purpose of this study was to perform a measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a standard 5-point protocol using iohexol clearance and compare it to a simplified protocol for mGFR determination and to some of the most commonly used eGFR formulas. A 5-point standard protocol using iohexol clearance was used for determination of mGFR in 50 children with mild stages of CKD. The result was compared to 2- and 3-point sampling protocol as well as with some standard children eGFR formulas. We calculated the prediction performance for eGFR formulas to distinguish CKD1 and CKD 2 stages, formulas' accuracy, and cutoff values. Data were prospectively collected. All eGFR formulas exhibited a statistically significant positive correlation with mGFR. The best correlation was found with CKID2012 eGFR formula and with cystatin C-based eGFR formulas. The correlation between standard and simplified protocols for mGFR determination was also strong, while creatinine clearance did not prove to be a reliable method for estimating GFR. The error distribution with simplified protocols was not dispersed. The prediction value was strong for CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula. Conclusion: Fewer sampling points can be safely used for measuring GFR in children. eGFR formulas that are not based solely on creatinine should be considered more often in GFR estimation. What is Known? • Iohexol clearance is an established method of measuring GFR in children and adolescents using different protocols. • Estimating GFR in children and adolescents is troublesome and is done using different formulas with anthropometric and biochemical markers in children and adolescents. What is New? • Iohexol measurement with two or three blood withdrawals can reliably distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients. • eGFR formulas have moderate reliability to predict distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients, of which CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula were the most accurate in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05937-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on different formulas is commonly used as a bedside tool to assess kidney function in children and young adults. The purpose of this study was to perform a measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a standard 5-point protocol using iohexol clearance and compare it to a simplified protocol for mGFR determination and to some of the most commonly used eGFR formulas. A 5-point standard protocol using iohexol clearance was used for determination of mGFR in 50 children with mild stages of CKD. The result was compared to 2- and 3-point sampling protocol as well as with some standard children eGFR formulas. We calculated the prediction performance for eGFR formulas to distinguish CKD1 and CKD 2 stages, formulas' accuracy, and cutoff values. Data were prospectively collected. All eGFR formulas exhibited a statistically significant positive correlation with mGFR. The best correlation was found with CKID2012 eGFR formula and with cystatin C-based eGFR formulas. The correlation between standard and simplified protocols for mGFR determination was also strong, while creatinine clearance did not prove to be a reliable method for estimating GFR. The error distribution with simplified protocols was not dispersed. The prediction value was strong for CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula. Conclusion: Fewer sampling points can be safely used for measuring GFR in children. eGFR formulas that are not based solely on creatinine should be considered more often in GFR estimation. What is Known? • Iohexol clearance is an established method of measuring GFR in children and adolescents using different protocols. • Estimating GFR in children and adolescents is troublesome and is done using different formulas with anthropometric and biochemical markers in children and adolescents. What is New? • Iohexol measurement with two or three blood withdrawals can reliably distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients. • eGFR formulas have moderate reliability to predict distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients, of which CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula were the most accurate in our study.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.