Case Report: A case study of positive doping control by animal-to-human drug transfer after an athlete administered medicine in spray format, containing clostebol acetate, to a pet dog.
Andrzej Pokrywka, Dariusz Sitkowski, Olga Surała, Laurie Gheddar, Pascal Kintz
{"title":"Case Report: A case study of positive doping control by animal-to-human drug transfer after an athlete administered medicine in spray format, containing clostebol acetate, to a pet dog.","authors":"Andrzej Pokrywka, Dariusz Sitkowski, Olga Surała, Laurie Gheddar, Pascal Kintz","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1480373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of a doping substance in an athlete's biological sample may not be only related to intentional pharmacological support. The unintended use of a prohibited substance may be due various reasons. This paper describes the case of a Polish canoeist preparing for the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris who presented a positive doping test result, as a consequence of administering medication to her injured dog. The athlete used a Trofodermin cutaneous spray (containing clostebol acetate) for pet treatment, which resulted in human transfer during close contact and subsequent detection by doping authorities. To bolster the athlete's defense, it was essential to substantiate the scenario of an unconscious violation of anti-doping rules with scientific evidence. Hence, the decision was made to analyze and compare samples of the athlete's hair and her dog's fur. This investigation confirmed that clostebol absorption occurred through the skin of the hands, transfer during sleeping with the dog on the same bedding and/or inhalation (during the application of the medication, which was dispensed to the animal's paws). This defense was accepted by the Court of Arbitration for the Sport Anti-Doping Division, which subsequently found that the athlete committed an anti-doping rule violation, but under circumstances that amounted to a \"no fault\" scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1480373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1480373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The presence of a doping substance in an athlete's biological sample may not be only related to intentional pharmacological support. The unintended use of a prohibited substance may be due various reasons. This paper describes the case of a Polish canoeist preparing for the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris who presented a positive doping test result, as a consequence of administering medication to her injured dog. The athlete used a Trofodermin cutaneous spray (containing clostebol acetate) for pet treatment, which resulted in human transfer during close contact and subsequent detection by doping authorities. To bolster the athlete's defense, it was essential to substantiate the scenario of an unconscious violation of anti-doping rules with scientific evidence. Hence, the decision was made to analyze and compare samples of the athlete's hair and her dog's fur. This investigation confirmed that clostebol absorption occurred through the skin of the hands, transfer during sleeping with the dog on the same bedding and/or inhalation (during the application of the medication, which was dispensed to the animal's paws). This defense was accepted by the Court of Arbitration for the Sport Anti-Doping Division, which subsequently found that the athlete committed an anti-doping rule violation, but under circumstances that amounted to a "no fault" scenario.
运动员生物样本中兴奋剂物质的存在可能不仅仅与有意的药物支持有关。意外使用禁用物质可能是由于各种原因。这篇文章描述了一个为2024年巴黎夏季奥运会做准备的波兰皮划艇运动员,由于给她受伤的狗服用药物,她的兴奋剂测试结果呈阳性。这名运动员使用Trofodermin皮肤喷雾剂(含有醋酸酯)进行宠物治疗,在密切接触期间导致人体转移,随后被兴奋剂当局发现。为了支持这名运动员的辩护,有必要用科学证据证明他无意识地违反了反兴奋剂规则。因此,决定对运动员的头发和她的狗毛样本进行分析和比较。这项调查证实,粪便吸收是通过手部皮肤发生的,在与狗睡在同一床上时转移和/或吸入(在给动物的爪子施用药物期间)。国际体育反兴奋剂仲裁法庭(Court of Arbitration for the Sport Anti-Doping Division)接受了这一辩护,随后发现这名运动员违反了反兴奋剂规则,但在“无过错”的情况下。