A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Octogenarians.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.3390/geriatrics9060161
Charlotte Nichol, Rajiv Das, Gill Barry, Michael Kelly, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Nicola Adams
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Octogenarians.","authors":"Charlotte Nichol, Rajiv Das, Gill Barry, Michael Kelly, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Nicola Adams","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9060161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite an established evidence-base for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improving functional outcomes and quality of life and reducing re-hospitalisation, there is limited research on CR for older cardiac patients, who require rehabilitation the most, as they are often very deconditioned due to aortic stenosis (AS). CR uptake in the UK is limited to 52% with national variability of provision and accessibility, and it is a national priority to increase uptake to 85%. Frequently, research has excluded older populations as they are deemed to be too frail or generally not suitable for inclusion. This study aimed to explore factors that can impact the uptake of CR in octogenarians. <b>Methods:</b> Qualitative interviews were carried out with 20 AS patients (12 female, 8 male), from a large NHS Trust in the North East of England. <b>Results:</b> Four main themes were identified in the data: Perceptions and Understanding, Delivery and Accessibility, Perceived Impact of Exercise and Health and Life Changes, and Transportation. <b>Discussion:</b> The findings suggested that the major factors were the understanding of the nature, purpose and relevance of CR to older patients, whether CR was offered, and the role of social support. Barriers and facilitators can impact uptake based on the mode of delivery and the individual circumstances identified. Future research could explore how to develop CR programmes that overcome the barriers identified in the research, such as education, monitoring strategies, use of telehealth, and home-based elements to create an acceptable and accessible programme for octogenarians.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9060161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite an established evidence-base for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improving functional outcomes and quality of life and reducing re-hospitalisation, there is limited research on CR for older cardiac patients, who require rehabilitation the most, as they are often very deconditioned due to aortic stenosis (AS). CR uptake in the UK is limited to 52% with national variability of provision and accessibility, and it is a national priority to increase uptake to 85%. Frequently, research has excluded older populations as they are deemed to be too frail or generally not suitable for inclusion. This study aimed to explore factors that can impact the uptake of CR in octogenarians. Methods: Qualitative interviews were carried out with 20 AS patients (12 female, 8 male), from a large NHS Trust in the North East of England. Results: Four main themes were identified in the data: Perceptions and Understanding, Delivery and Accessibility, Perceived Impact of Exercise and Health and Life Changes, and Transportation. Discussion: The findings suggested that the major factors were the understanding of the nature, purpose and relevance of CR to older patients, whether CR was offered, and the role of social support. Barriers and facilitators can impact uptake based on the mode of delivery and the individual circumstances identified. Future research could explore how to develop CR programmes that overcome the barriers identified in the research, such as education, monitoring strategies, use of telehealth, and home-based elements to create an acceptable and accessible programme for octogenarians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
八旬老人心脏康复接受障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
导语:尽管心脏康复(CR)改善功能结局和生活质量并减少再次住院的证据基础已建立,但对老年心脏病患者的CR研究有限,因为他们通常因主动脉狭窄(as)而非常虚弱,最需要康复。由于国家提供和可及性的差异,英国的CR吸收率限制在52%,国家优先考虑将吸收率提高到85%。通常,研究将老年人排除在外,因为他们被认为过于虚弱或通常不适合纳入研究。本研究旨在探讨影响八旬老人CR摄取的因素。方法:对来自英格兰东北部一家大型NHS信托机构的20名AS患者(12名女性,8名男性)进行定性访谈。结果:在数据中确定了四个主要主题:感知和理解,传递和可及性,运动和健康的感知影响以及生活变化,以及交通。讨论:研究结果表明,主要因素是对老年患者CR的性质、目的和相关性的理解,是否提供CR,以及社会支持的作用。障碍和促进因素可根据交付模式和所确定的个别情况影响吸收。未来的研究可以探索如何制定CR方案,克服研究中确定的障碍,如教育、监测战略、远程保健的使用和基于家庭的要素,为80多岁老人创建一个可接受和可访问的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Study of the Influence of Life Events and Social Support on Relapses and Recurrences in Older Patients with Bipolar Disorder. Short- and Long-Term Effects on Physical Fitness in Older Adults: Results from an 8-Week Exercise Program Repeated in Two Consecutive Years. Genetic Predisposition to Hippocampal Atrophy and Risk of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia. Healthcare Workers' Attitudes Toward Older Adults' Nutrition: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study in Italian Nursing Homes. Effects of Aquatic Exercise in Older People with Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1