Assessing and upgrading the cleanliness of the emergency department brief title: upgrading the emergency room's cleanliness.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.177
Elisheva Levine, Samar Abo-Gush, Bath Sheva Ezagui, Ruth David, Puah Kopuit, Naama Bagrish, Todd Zalut, Marc V Assous, Yossi Freier-Dror, Amos M Yinnon, Shmuel Benenson
{"title":"Assessing and upgrading the cleanliness of the emergency department brief title: upgrading the emergency room's cleanliness.","authors":"Elisheva Levine, Samar Abo-Gush, Bath Sheva Ezagui, Ruth David, Puah Kopuit, Naama Bagrish, Todd Zalut, Marc V Assous, Yossi Freier-Dror, Amos M Yinnon, Shmuel Benenson","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To upgrade cleaning and disinfection of patient rooms in a crowded emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, 3-component, before-and-after intervention study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1 consisted of a 4-week baseline determination of ED patient-room cleanliness, using two means: (1) the fluorescence spray, applied before cleaning and assessed subsequently with an ultraviolet lamp. Results are expressed as % of removed spots/all spots (≥7/10 cleaned spots/room was considered clean; (2) ATP swabs obtained after cleaning, which test for presence of residual organic material; readings <45 were considered clean. Phase 2 consisted of revision and reorganization of established cleaning practices. Phase 3 consisted of adding one cleaning person in afternoon/evening shifts, for 4-weeks, during which room cleanliness was assessed as previously described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cleanliness of the 79 patient rooms, for which fluorescence tests were available from before and after cleaning for all three phases of the study, increased from a baseline of 50% ± 35 removed spots/all spots, to 61% ± 36 after the first intervention (CI95 -0.6 - 21, <i>P</i> = 0.54) and to 68% ± 35 after the second intervention (CI95 5 - 31, <i>P</i> = 0.004, as compared to the baseline). Subanalysis showed that evening shifts improved most remarkably, from 47% ± 32 (n = 45), to 60% ± 33 (n = 49) to 76%±29 (n = 29), respectively, from baseline through the second and third phase (<i>P</i> = 0.001). ATP testing appeared less sensitive for assessment of cleanliness but confirmed the assessment by fluorescence for overall cleanliness (CI95 1 - 14, <i>P</i> = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate that a two-step intervention significantly improves cleaning in a busy ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To upgrade cleaning and disinfection of patient rooms in a crowded emergency department (ED).

Setting: Tertiary referral hospital.

Design: Prospective, 3-component, before-and-after intervention study.

Methods: Phase 1 consisted of a 4-week baseline determination of ED patient-room cleanliness, using two means: (1) the fluorescence spray, applied before cleaning and assessed subsequently with an ultraviolet lamp. Results are expressed as % of removed spots/all spots (≥7/10 cleaned spots/room was considered clean; (2) ATP swabs obtained after cleaning, which test for presence of residual organic material; readings <45 were considered clean. Phase 2 consisted of revision and reorganization of established cleaning practices. Phase 3 consisted of adding one cleaning person in afternoon/evening shifts, for 4-weeks, during which room cleanliness was assessed as previously described.

Results: Cleanliness of the 79 patient rooms, for which fluorescence tests were available from before and after cleaning for all three phases of the study, increased from a baseline of 50% ± 35 removed spots/all spots, to 61% ± 36 after the first intervention (CI95 -0.6 - 21, P = 0.54) and to 68% ± 35 after the second intervention (CI95 5 - 31, P = 0.004, as compared to the baseline). Subanalysis showed that evening shifts improved most remarkably, from 47% ± 32 (n = 45), to 60% ± 33 (n = 49) to 76%±29 (n = 29), respectively, from baseline through the second and third phase (P = 0.001). ATP testing appeared less sensitive for assessment of cleanliness but confirmed the assessment by fluorescence for overall cleanliness (CI95 1 - 14, P = 0.018).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that a two-step intervention significantly improves cleaning in a busy ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和提升急诊科的清洁度题目:提升急诊科的清洁度。
目的:提高拥挤急诊科(ED)病房的清洁和消毒水平。环境:三级转诊医院。设计:前瞻性、三组分、干预前后研究。方法:第一阶段包括为期4周的ED病房清洁度基线测定,采用两种方法:(1)荧光喷雾,在清洁前使用,随后使用紫外线灯评估。结果用去除斑点/所有斑点的百分比表示(≥7/10个清洁斑点/房间被认为是干净的;(2)清洗后获得的ATP拭子,用于检测是否存在残留的有机物质;读数结果:与基线相比,在研究的所有三个阶段清洁前后均可进行荧光检测的79个病房的清洁度从50%±35个斑点/所有斑点的基线值增加到第一次干预后的61%±36 (CI95 -0.6 - 21, P = 0.54)和第二次干预后的68%±35 (CI95 - 31, P = 0.004)。亚分析显示,从基线到第二和第三阶段,夜班的改善最为显著,分别从47%±32 (n = 45)、60%±33 (n = 49)到76%±29 (n = 29) (P = 0.001)。ATP检测对洁净度评价的敏感性较低,但荧光检测对整体洁净度评价的敏感性较低(CI95 1 ~ 14, P = 0.018)。结论:我们的数据表明,两步干预显著改善了繁忙急诊科的清洁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic guideline concordance and area deprivation in the US emergency departments, 2015-2024. Current infection control practices for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO): a survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) research network and affiliated US-based hospitals. Azithromycin use for common acute respiratory infections during a Mycoplasma pneumoniae national surge: results from the SHARPS-OP benchmarking collaborative. Antimicrobial stewardship without borders: a case study in sustainable collaboration between the University of Florida, University of Rwanda and the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. Local public health response to first Candida auris outbreak spanning 28 healthcare facilities-Maricopa County, Arizona, April 2022-February 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1