A Content Analysis of #Childhoodcancer Chatter on X.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1089/jayao.2024.0117
Sherry Pagoto, Cameron Cordaway, Andie Napolitano, Jessica Foy, Cindy Pan, Keith Bellizzi
{"title":"A Content Analysis of #Childhoodcancer Chatter on X.","authors":"Sherry Pagoto, Cameron Cordaway, Andie Napolitano, Jessica Foy, Cindy Pan, Keith Bellizzi","doi":"10.1089/jayao.2024.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over a half million children are living with cancer in the United States. Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for cancer communication by public health organizations as well as health care providers, scientists, patients, and caregivers. Given the dearth of research on childhood cancer communication, the present study aimed to examine the nature of tweets on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that used the hashtag #childhoodcancer, the types of these tweets that attracted the most retweets, the types of users tweeting about childhood cancer (e.g., individuals, health care professionals), and the nature of tweets made by the different types of users. We performed a content analysis of tweets we captured on X via NCapture in October and December 2022. Of the 3217 tweets captured, we randomly sampled 1000 eligible tweets and manually double-coded them. Interrater agreement was 83% (κ = 0.75). Results revealed six themes in the tweets, including fundraising (21.2%), advocacy (20.2%), motivational (17.5%), educational (15.3%), science (12.8%), and shout-outs (12.1%). Motivational, advocacy, and science tweets attracted more retweets than fundraising tweets and shout-outs (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Individuals (i.e., patients, caregivers, and advocates tweeting on their own behalf) and nonprofit organizations made a majority of the tweets at 41.5% and 38.6%, respectively, followed by health care professionals (8.7%), academic and/or medical centers (4.2%), and for-profit companies (3.5%). Childhood cancer communication on X is dominated by individuals doing advocacy and fundraising. X may provide important opportunities for public health messaging and science communication about childhood cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2024.0117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over a half million children are living with cancer in the United States. Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for cancer communication by public health organizations as well as health care providers, scientists, patients, and caregivers. Given the dearth of research on childhood cancer communication, the present study aimed to examine the nature of tweets on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that used the hashtag #childhoodcancer, the types of these tweets that attracted the most retweets, the types of users tweeting about childhood cancer (e.g., individuals, health care professionals), and the nature of tweets made by the different types of users. We performed a content analysis of tweets we captured on X via NCapture in October and December 2022. Of the 3217 tweets captured, we randomly sampled 1000 eligible tweets and manually double-coded them. Interrater agreement was 83% (κ = 0.75). Results revealed six themes in the tweets, including fundraising (21.2%), advocacy (20.2%), motivational (17.5%), educational (15.3%), science (12.8%), and shout-outs (12.1%). Motivational, advocacy, and science tweets attracted more retweets than fundraising tweets and shout-outs (p < 0.001). Individuals (i.e., patients, caregivers, and advocates tweeting on their own behalf) and nonprofit organizations made a majority of the tweets at 41.5% and 38.6%, respectively, followed by health care professionals (8.7%), academic and/or medical centers (4.2%), and for-profit companies (3.5%). Childhood cancer communication on X is dominated by individuals doing advocacy and fundraising. X may provide important opportunities for public health messaging and science communication about childhood cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology (JAYAO) breaks new ground as the first cancer journal dedicated to all aspects of adolescent and young adult (AYA)-aged cancer patients and survivors. JAYAO is the only central forum for peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and research in the field, bringing together all AYA oncology stakeholders and professionals across disciplines, including clinicians, researchers, psychosocial and supportive care providers, and pediatric and adult cancer institutions.
期刊最新文献
A Content Analysis of #Childhoodcancer Chatter on X. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review. Survival Outcomes Following Chemotherapy for High-Grade Central Nervous System Tumors in Adolescents and Young Adults: An Exploration of Variations According to Ethnicity and Deprivation. "Infertility Isn't a Choice!": Conversations on Twitter about the Financial Burden of Oncofertility Care. Understanding Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Engagement with Cancer Storylines in Entertainment Media Narratives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1