How to improve the mechanical safety of a novel spinal implant while saving costs and time.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS JOR Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.70026
Annette Kienle, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Christian Schröder, Andrea Pietsch
{"title":"How to improve the mechanical safety of a novel spinal implant while saving costs and time.","authors":"Annette Kienle, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Christian Schröder, Andrea Pietsch","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal implant failure is associated with prolonged patient suffering, high costs for the medical device industry, and a high economic burden for the health care system. Pre-clinical mechanical testing has great potential to reduce the risk of such failure. However, there are no binding regulations for planning and interpretation of mechanical testing. Therefore, different strategies exist. Mainly for novel implants an option is to start with a structured scientific literature search that forms an objective background for the definition of an implant-specific test plan, the derivation of acceptance criteria and interpretation of the test results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper describes, how a literature-based approach can look like from the initial literature search through the derivation of the test plan and the acceptance criteria, to the final test result evaluation and how this approach can support the proof that the device meets all necessary safety and performance standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main advantage of this literature-based approach is that testing and test result interpretation are linked with the loads acting on the individual implant in vivo. In an ideal case, testing is focused on the individual implant in a way that ensures maximum efficiency during the development and approval process combined with maximum insight in safety and effectiveness of the implant. Even comparative implant testing may become obsolete, which is a big advantage if comparative implant and related data are not available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This approach to pre-clinical mechanical testing offers the potential to create a chain of arguments, from literature review through testing to the interpretation of test results. This methodology can significantly enhance testing efficiency, reduce risk of failure, and ultimately prevent unnecessary patient suffering and healthcare costs. By synthesizing scientific insights with regulatory requirements, this review aims to guide clinicians and researchers in improving patient care and advancing device technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"7 4","pages":"e70026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal implant failure is associated with prolonged patient suffering, high costs for the medical device industry, and a high economic burden for the health care system. Pre-clinical mechanical testing has great potential to reduce the risk of such failure. However, there are no binding regulations for planning and interpretation of mechanical testing. Therefore, different strategies exist. Mainly for novel implants an option is to start with a structured scientific literature search that forms an objective background for the definition of an implant-specific test plan, the derivation of acceptance criteria and interpretation of the test results.

Methods: This paper describes, how a literature-based approach can look like from the initial literature search through the derivation of the test plan and the acceptance criteria, to the final test result evaluation and how this approach can support the proof that the device meets all necessary safety and performance standards.

Results: The main advantage of this literature-based approach is that testing and test result interpretation are linked with the loads acting on the individual implant in vivo. In an ideal case, testing is focused on the individual implant in a way that ensures maximum efficiency during the development and approval process combined with maximum insight in safety and effectiveness of the implant. Even comparative implant testing may become obsolete, which is a big advantage if comparative implant and related data are not available.

Conclusion: This approach to pre-clinical mechanical testing offers the potential to create a chain of arguments, from literature review through testing to the interpretation of test results. This methodology can significantly enhance testing efficiency, reduce risk of failure, and ultimately prevent unnecessary patient suffering and healthcare costs. By synthesizing scientific insights with regulatory requirements, this review aims to guide clinicians and researchers in improving patient care and advancing device technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在节省成本和时间的同时提高新型脊柱植入物的机械安全性。
背景:脊柱植入失败与患者的长期痛苦、医疗器械行业的高成本以及卫生保健系统的高经济负担有关。临床前力学试验有很大的潜力来减少这种失败的风险。然而,对于机械测试的规划和解释并没有约束性的规定。因此,存在不同的策略。对于新型植入物,一个主要的选择是从结构化的科学文献搜索开始,为植入物特定测试计划的定义、验收标准的推导和测试结果的解释形成客观背景。方法:本文描述了基于文献的方法如何从最初的文献检索到推导测试计划和验收标准,再到最终的测试结果评估,以及该方法如何支持证明设备符合所有必要的安全和性能标准。结果:这种基于文献的方法的主要优点是测试和测试结果的解释与体内单个植入物的负荷有关。在理想的情况下,测试集中在单个植入物上,以确保在开发和批准过程中实现最高效率,并结合对植入物安全性和有效性的最大了解。即使是比较种植体测试也可能过时,如果没有比较种植体和相关数据,这是一个很大的优势。结论:这种临床前机械测试的方法可能会产生一系列的争论,从文献回顾到测试再到测试结果的解释。这种方法可以显著提高测试效率,降低失败风险,并最终防止不必要的患者痛苦和医疗保健成本。通过综合科学见解和法规要求,本综述旨在指导临床医生和研究人员改善患者护理和推进设备技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is There a Positive or Negative Correlation Between Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration by Pfirrmann Grading. Contemporary clinical perspectives on chronic low back pain: The biology, mechanics, etc. underpinning clinical and radiological evaluation. Assessment of Vertebral Bone Marrow Perfusion, Fat/Water Content, and Trabecular Bone Changes Using Multimodal MRI and Micro-CT in a Rat Model of Chronic Kidney Disease. Low-Frequency Cyclic Stretch Upregulates the Expression of Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells to Inhibit the Resistin-Induced Interleukin-20 Expression. Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Mediates the Causal Effect of Genetically Predicted Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis on Spinal Stenosis: Evidence From a Mendelian Randomization Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1