Evaluation of Internal Fit in Custom-Made Posts and Cores Fabricated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Techniques.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Functional Biomaterials Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.3390/jfb15120389
Eric Jensen, Shariel Sayardoust
{"title":"Evaluation of Internal Fit in Custom-Made Posts and Cores Fabricated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Techniques.","authors":"Eric Jensen, Shariel Sayardoust","doi":"10.3390/jfb15120389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the internal fit of custom-made posts and cores fabricated using digital impressions (DI) and conventional vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impressions in restorative dentistry.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A typodont tooth model, simulating the anatomy of the root canal of a central incisor, was utilized for the study. Two groups were formed, Group A and Group B, and each group provided a total of 18 impressions of two types: DIs and VPS impressions. In Group A, posts and cores (PCs) were fabricated using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) from the DIs. Meanwhile, in Group B, conventionally cast (CC) PCs were created from the VPS impressions. Silicone replicas of the internal surfaces were produced, and measurements were made at seven different points for each group. A statistical analysis was performed to assess the differences in internal fit between the two impression techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a statistically significant difference in mean internal fit between Group A (DI and SLM) and Group B (VPS and CC), with Group A exhibiting a mean internal fit of 182.6 µm and Group B showing a mean of 205.9 µm. While both groups demonstrated considerable variability in internal fit measurements, the digital impression technique showed promise for achieving superior internal fit, with a significantly greater fit for measuring points on sides and the most apical part of the post for Group A. Variations were observed across different measuring points, emphasizing the impact of impression technique on specific regions within the tooth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge in digital dentistry by highlighting the potential benefits of DIs in achieving a superior internal fit for custom-made PCs. Clinicians may consider the advantages of digital techniques to enhance the precision of their restorative procedures, although further research is warranted to evaluate the clinical impact of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15120389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the internal fit of custom-made posts and cores fabricated using digital impressions (DI) and conventional vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impressions in restorative dentistry.

Materials and methods: A typodont tooth model, simulating the anatomy of the root canal of a central incisor, was utilized for the study. Two groups were formed, Group A and Group B, and each group provided a total of 18 impressions of two types: DIs and VPS impressions. In Group A, posts and cores (PCs) were fabricated using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) from the DIs. Meanwhile, in Group B, conventionally cast (CC) PCs were created from the VPS impressions. Silicone replicas of the internal surfaces were produced, and measurements were made at seven different points for each group. A statistical analysis was performed to assess the differences in internal fit between the two impression techniques.

Results: The results revealed a statistically significant difference in mean internal fit between Group A (DI and SLM) and Group B (VPS and CC), with Group A exhibiting a mean internal fit of 182.6 µm and Group B showing a mean of 205.9 µm. While both groups demonstrated considerable variability in internal fit measurements, the digital impression technique showed promise for achieving superior internal fit, with a significantly greater fit for measuring points on sides and the most apical part of the post for Group A. Variations were observed across different measuring points, emphasizing the impact of impression technique on specific regions within the tooth.

Conclusion: This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge in digital dentistry by highlighting the potential benefits of DIs in achieving a superior internal fit for custom-made PCs. Clinicians may consider the advantages of digital techniques to enhance the precision of their restorative procedures, although further research is warranted to evaluate the clinical impact of these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用全数字化与传统技术制造的定制桩芯的内部配合评估。
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较使用数字印模(DI)和传统乙烯基聚硅氧烷(VPS)印模制作的定制桩核在修复牙科中的内部配合度。材料与方法:采用模拟中切牙根管解剖结构的排印齿模型进行研究。分为A组和B组,每组共18个印痕,分为DIs和VPS两种。在A组中,使用选择性激光熔化(SLM)从DIs中制造柱和芯(PCs)。同时,在B组中,从VPS压模中制造常规铸造(CC) PCs。制作了内部表面的硅胶复制品,并在每组的七个不同点进行了测量。进行了统计分析,以评估两种压印技术之间的内部配合差异。结果:a组(DI和SLM)和B组(VPS和CC)的平均内拟合值有统计学差异,a组的平均内拟合值为182.6µm, B组的平均内拟合值为205.9µm。虽然两组在内部配合测量中都表现出相当大的差异,但数字印模技术显示出实现卓越内部配合的希望,a组在侧面和最顶端部分的测量点上有更大的配合,在不同的测量点上观察到变化,强调了印模技术对牙齿特定区域的影响。结论:这项研究通过强调DIs在实现定制pc的卓越内部配合方面的潜在优势,有助于数字牙科知识的增长。临床医生可能会考虑数字技术的优势,以提高他们的修复程序的精度,尽管需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
期刊最新文献
Preventing Oral Dual Biofilm Development with Innovative Bioactive Varnishes. Schiff Base-Crosslinked Tetra-PEG-BSA Hydrogel: Design, Properties, and Multifunctional Functions. The Relationship Between Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss and Resonance Frequency Analysis. Bisphenol A Release from Fiber-Reinforced vs. Conventional Stainless-Steel Fixed Retainers: An In Vitro Study. Effect of Sequential vs. Simultaneous Dual Growth Factor Release from Structured Heparin-Poly-Electrolyte Multilayer Coatings on Peri-Implant Bone Formation and Angiogenesis in Pig Mandibles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1