Vasomotion and Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Versus Autonomic Control.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0426
Timothy Howells, Anders Hånell, Teodor Svedung Wettervik, Per Enblad
{"title":"<b>Vasomotion and Cerebral Blood Flow in</b> Patients With <b>Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Versus Autonomic Control</b>.","authors":"Timothy Howells, Anders Hånell, Teodor Svedung Wettervik, Per Enblad","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the roles of extraparenchymal autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of cerebral blood flow (CBF) versus intraparenchymal cerebrovascular autoregulation in 487 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 413 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Vasomotion intensity of extraparenchymal and intraparenchymal vessels were quantified as the amplitude of oscillations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in the very low frequency range of 0.02-0.07 Hz, or periods of 55-15 sec, computed with a bandpass filter. A version of the pressure reactivity index (PRx-55-15) was computed as the correlation of the filtered waveforms, ABP-55-15 and ICP-55-15. Since ABP-55-15 is measured in the radial artery, any influence of cerebral factors must be mediated by the ANS. ICP-55-15 is measured in the brain and is influenced by intraparenchymal chemical and metabolic factors in addition to the ANS. Patient outcome was assessed using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSe). Ten-day mean cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was negatively correlated with GOSe in the TBI cohort (<i>R</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.01) but positively correlated with GOSe in the SAH cohort, (<i>R</i> = 0.32, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), indicating a much greater dependence on ANS support in the form of elevated CPP in SAH. The optimal CPP range for TBI was 60-70 mmHg, but for SAH it was 110-120 mmHg. The percentage of monitoring time with PRx-55-15 < 0.8, indicating very pressure-active cerebral vessels that resist ANS influence via systemic ABP, is positively correlated with GOSe in the TBI cohort (<i>R</i> = 0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.003), but negatively correlated with GOSe in the SAH cohort (<i>R</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The TBI cohort optimal PRx-55-15 for patient outcome was -1.0, while the SAH optimum was 0.3. For the TBI cohort, the correlation of ABP-55-15 amplitude with 10-day mean ICP-55-15 amplitude was 0.29. For the SAH cohort the correlation was 0.51, which is stronger (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The TBI cohort had a median GOSe of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7), while SAH had a median of 3 (IQR 3-5), which is worse (<i>p</i> < 0.00001). The higher optimal CPP in patients with SAH, more passive optimal pressure reactivity, and greater dependence of cerebral on systemic vasomotion indicate that they require more active support by the ANS and systemic circulation for CBF than patients with TBI. CBF in patients with TBI is more reliant on cerebrovascular autoregulation based on metabolic demand. This appears to be deficient following SAH, making the heightened ANS support necessary. Although this support is beneficial, it does not fully compensate for the loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation, as reflected in the problems in the SAH cohort with delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the roles of extraparenchymal autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of cerebral blood flow (CBF) versus intraparenchymal cerebrovascular autoregulation in 487 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 413 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Vasomotion intensity of extraparenchymal and intraparenchymal vessels were quantified as the amplitude of oscillations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in the very low frequency range of 0.02-0.07 Hz, or periods of 55-15 sec, computed with a bandpass filter. A version of the pressure reactivity index (PRx-55-15) was computed as the correlation of the filtered waveforms, ABP-55-15 and ICP-55-15. Since ABP-55-15 is measured in the radial artery, any influence of cerebral factors must be mediated by the ANS. ICP-55-15 is measured in the brain and is influenced by intraparenchymal chemical and metabolic factors in addition to the ANS. Patient outcome was assessed using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSe). Ten-day mean cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was negatively correlated with GOSe in the TBI cohort (R = -0.13, p = 0.01) but positively correlated with GOSe in the SAH cohort, (R = 0.32, p < 0.00001), indicating a much greater dependence on ANS support in the form of elevated CPP in SAH. The optimal CPP range for TBI was 60-70 mmHg, but for SAH it was 110-120 mmHg. The percentage of monitoring time with PRx-55-15 < 0.8, indicating very pressure-active cerebral vessels that resist ANS influence via systemic ABP, is positively correlated with GOSe in the TBI cohort (R = 0.14, p = 0.003), but negatively correlated with GOSe in the SAH cohort (R = -0.10, p = 0.004). The TBI cohort optimal PRx-55-15 for patient outcome was -1.0, while the SAH optimum was 0.3. For the TBI cohort, the correlation of ABP-55-15 amplitude with 10-day mean ICP-55-15 amplitude was 0.29. For the SAH cohort the correlation was 0.51, which is stronger (p = 0.0001). The TBI cohort had a median GOSe of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7), while SAH had a median of 3 (IQR 3-5), which is worse (p < 0.00001). The higher optimal CPP in patients with SAH, more passive optimal pressure reactivity, and greater dependence of cerebral on systemic vasomotion indicate that they require more active support by the ANS and systemic circulation for CBF than patients with TBI. CBF in patients with TBI is more reliant on cerebrovascular autoregulation based on metabolic demand. This appears to be deficient following SAH, making the heightened ANS support necessary. Although this support is beneficial, it does not fully compensate for the loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation, as reflected in the problems in the SAH cohort with delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤性脑损伤和蛛网膜下腔出血患者的血管运动和脑血流:脑血管自身调节与自主控制。
本研究比较了487例动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者和413例创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者脑实质外自主神经系统(ANS)对脑血流(CBF)的控制与脑实质内脑血管自身调节的作用。脑实质外和脑实质内血管的血管运动强度量化为动脉血压(ABP)和颅内压(ICP)在0.02-0.07 Hz的极低频范围内或55-15秒的振荡幅度,通过带通滤波器计算。压力反应性指数(PRx-55-15)的一个版本被计算为滤波波形,ABP-55-15和ICP-55-15的相关性。由于ABP-55-15是在桡动脉中测量的,任何脑因素的影响都必须由ANS介导,而ICP-55-15是在大脑中测量的,除了ANS外,还受到脑实质内化学和代谢因素的影响,使用扩展格拉斯哥结局评分(GOSe)评估患者预后。10天平均脑灌注压(CPP)在TBI组与GOSe呈负相关(R = -0.13, p = 0.01),而在SAH组与GOSe呈正相关(R = 0.32, p < 0.00001),表明SAH患者以CPP升高的形式对ANS支持的依赖性更大。TBI的最佳CPP范围为60-70 mmHg,而SAH的最佳CPP范围为110-120 mmHg。PRx-55-15监测时间的百分比< 0.8,表明压力非常活跃的脑血管通过全身ABP抵抗ANS的影响,与TBI队列中的GOSe呈正相关(R = 0.14, p = 0.003),但与SAH队列中的GOSe呈负相关(R = -0.10, p = 0.004)。TBI队列患者预后的最佳PRx-55-15为-1.0,而SAH的最佳PRx-55-15为0.3。对于TBI队列,ABP-55-15振幅与10天平均ICP-55-15振幅的相关性为0.29。对于SAH队列,相关性为0.51,更强(p = 0.0001)。TBI组的中位GOSe为5(四分位数范围[IQR] 3-7),而SAH组的中位GOSe为3 (IQR 3-5),后者更差(p < 0.00001)。SAH患者的最佳CPP更高,更被动的最佳压力反应性,大脑对全身血管舒缩的依赖性更大,表明他们比TBI患者更需要ANS和体循环对CBF的主动支持。脑外伤患者的脑血流更依赖于基于代谢需求的脑血管自动调节。在SAH后,这似乎是有缺陷的,因此需要加强ANS的支持。虽然这种支持是有益的,但它并不能完全弥补脑血管自身调节的丧失,这反映在SAH队列延迟脑缺血和预后不良的问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Human Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. Sex Differences in Neurological Outcome at 6 and 12 Months Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. An Observational Analysis of the OXY-TC Trial. Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma (TOP-NT) Pre-Clinical Consortium Study: A Synopsis. Prospective Harmonization, Common Data Elements, and Sharing Strategies for Multicenter Pre-Clinical Traumatic Brain Injury Research in the Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma Consortium. Impact of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy on Mental Health and Multidimensional Outcome and Quality of Life: An NIDILRR TBIMS Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1