Michail E Klontzas, Spyros I Vernardis, Aristea Batsali, Fotios Papadogiannis, Nicki Panoskaltsis, Athanasios Mantalaris
{"title":"Machine Learning and Metabolomics Predict Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation in 2D and 3D Cultures.","authors":"Michail E Klontzas, Spyros I Vernardis, Aristea Batsali, Fotios Papadogiannis, Nicki Panoskaltsis, Athanasios Mantalaris","doi":"10.3390/jfb15120367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stem cells have been widely used to produce artificial bone grafts. Nonetheless, the variability in the degree of stem cell differentiation is an inherent drawback of artificial graft development and requires robust evaluation tools that can certify the quality of stem cell-based products and avoid source-tissue-related and patient-specific variability in outcomes. Omics analyses have been utilised for the evaluation of stem cell attributes in all stages of stem cell biomanufacturing. Herein, metabolomics in combination with machine learning was utilised for the benchmarking of osteogenic differentiation quality in 2D and 3D cultures. Metabolomics analysis was performed with the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A set of 11 metabolites was used to train an XGboost model which achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between differentiated and undifferentiated umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB MSCs). The model was benchmarked against samples not present in the training set, being able to efficiently capture osteogenesis in 3D UCB MSC cultures with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82.6%. On the contrary, the model did not capture any differentiation in Wharton's Jelly MSC samples, which are well-known underperformers in osteogenic differentiation (AUC of 56.2%). Mineralisation was significantly correlated with the levels of fumarate, glycerol, and myo-inositol, the four metabolites found most important for model performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94, and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96, and <i>p</i> = 0.016, <i>p</i> = 0.0059, and <i>p</i> = 0.0022, respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that metabolomics in combination with machine learning can be used for the development of reliable potency assays for the evaluation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15120367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stem cells have been widely used to produce artificial bone grafts. Nonetheless, the variability in the degree of stem cell differentiation is an inherent drawback of artificial graft development and requires robust evaluation tools that can certify the quality of stem cell-based products and avoid source-tissue-related and patient-specific variability in outcomes. Omics analyses have been utilised for the evaluation of stem cell attributes in all stages of stem cell biomanufacturing. Herein, metabolomics in combination with machine learning was utilised for the benchmarking of osteogenic differentiation quality in 2D and 3D cultures. Metabolomics analysis was performed with the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A set of 11 metabolites was used to train an XGboost model which achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between differentiated and undifferentiated umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (UCB MSCs). The model was benchmarked against samples not present in the training set, being able to efficiently capture osteogenesis in 3D UCB MSC cultures with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82.6%. On the contrary, the model did not capture any differentiation in Wharton's Jelly MSC samples, which are well-known underperformers in osteogenic differentiation (AUC of 56.2%). Mineralisation was significantly correlated with the levels of fumarate, glycerol, and myo-inositol, the four metabolites found most important for model performance (R2 = 0.89, R2 = 0.94, and R2 = 0.96, and p = 0.016, p = 0.0059, and p = 0.0022, respectively). In conclusion, our results indicate that metabolomics in combination with machine learning can be used for the development of reliable potency assays for the evaluation of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.