[Association between serum BIN1 level and Killip class in patients with acute myocardial infraction].

Yanni Wang, Xia Huang, Fuheng Chen, Yuanyuan Gao, Xiangrong Cui, Qin Yan, Xuan Jing
{"title":"[Association between serum BIN1 level and Killip class in patients with acute myocardial infraction].","authors":"Yanni Wang, Xia Huang, Fuheng Chen, Yuanyuan Gao, Xiangrong Cui, Qin Yan, Xuan Jing","doi":"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.12.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the correlation of serum levels of bridging integrating factor 1 (BIN1) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and Killip class of the patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected the data from 94 patients with AMI and 30 healthy individuals for analysis of the correlations of serum BIN1 levels with Killip class, TIMI scores, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We also assessed the diagnostic value of BIN1 combined with NLR for AMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum BIN1 levels were significantly lower in AMI patients than in the healthy individuals (<i>P</i>=0.032). The AMI patients with Killip class I had significantly lower serum BIN1 levels than the healthy individuals (<i>P</i>=0.008). Serum BIN1 level was an independent predictor of AMI with a predictive value of 0.630 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.513-0.748) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.341 ng/mL, a specificity of 50%, and a sensitivity of 78.5%. Serum BIN1 level was also an independent predictor for Killip class I group in the AMI patients with a predictive value of 0.672 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.548-0.797) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.287 ng/mL, a specificity of 74.1%, and a sensitivity of 60%. For AMI diagnosis, the combination of NLR and serum BIN1 level had a predictive value of 0.811 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.727-0.895) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.548 ng/mL, with a specificity of 92.6% and a sensitivity of 62.2%. There was a positive correlation between serum BIN1 level and TIMI score in AMI patients (<i>r</i>=0.186, <i>P</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BIN1 is correlated with AMI and can be helpful for predicting short-term prognosis of the patients, and BIN1 combined with NLR has a high diagnostic value for AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18962,"journal":{"name":"南方医科大学学报杂志","volume":"44 12","pages":"2388-2395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"南方医科大学学报杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.12.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the correlation of serum levels of bridging integrating factor 1 (BIN1) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and Killip class of the patients.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the data from 94 patients with AMI and 30 healthy individuals for analysis of the correlations of serum BIN1 levels with Killip class, TIMI scores, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We also assessed the diagnostic value of BIN1 combined with NLR for AMI.

Results: Serum BIN1 levels were significantly lower in AMI patients than in the healthy individuals (P=0.032). The AMI patients with Killip class I had significantly lower serum BIN1 levels than the healthy individuals (P=0.008). Serum BIN1 level was an independent predictor of AMI with a predictive value of 0.630 (95% CI: 0.513-0.748) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.341 ng/mL, a specificity of 50%, and a sensitivity of 78.5%. Serum BIN1 level was also an independent predictor for Killip class I group in the AMI patients with a predictive value of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.548-0.797) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.287 ng/mL, a specificity of 74.1%, and a sensitivity of 60%. For AMI diagnosis, the combination of NLR and serum BIN1 level had a predictive value of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.727-0.895) at the optimal cutoff level of 0.548 ng/mL, with a specificity of 92.6% and a sensitivity of 62.2%. There was a positive correlation between serum BIN1 level and TIMI score in AMI patients (r=0.186, P=0.003).

Conclusions: BIN1 is correlated with AMI and can be helpful for predicting short-term prognosis of the patients, and BIN1 combined with NLR has a high diagnostic value for AMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[急性心肌梗死患者血清BIN1水平与Killip分级的关系]。
目的:探讨血清桥接整合因子1 (BIN1)水平与急性心肌梗死(AMI)及Killip分级的相关性。方法:回顾性收集94例AMI患者和30例健康人的资料,分析血清BIN1水平与Killip分级、TIMI评分和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)的相关性。我们还评估了BIN1联合NLR对AMI的诊断价值。结果:AMI患者血清BIN1水平明显低于正常人群(P=0.032)。Killip I级AMI患者血清BIN1水平明显低于健康人(P=0.008)。血清BIN1水平是AMI的独立预测因子,在0.341 ng/mL的最佳截断水平下,预测值为0.630 (95% CI: 0.513-0.748),特异性为50%,敏感性为78.5%。血清BIN1水平也是Killip I类AMI患者的独立预测指标,在最佳截断水平为0.287 ng/mL时,其预测值为0.672 (95% CI: 0.548-0.797),特异性为74.1%,敏感性为60%。在最佳截断水平0.548 ng/mL时,NLR与血清BIN1水平联合诊断AMI的预测值为0.811 (95% CI: 0.727-0.895),特异性为92.6%,敏感性为62.2%。AMI患者血清BIN1水平与TIMI评分呈正相关(r=0.186, P=0.003)。结论:BIN1与AMI相关,有助于预测患者的短期预后,BIN1联合NLR对AMI有较高的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
南方医科大学学报杂志
南方医科大学学报杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
208
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Buyang Huanwu Decoction reduces mitochondrial autophagy in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts in hypoxic culture by inhibiting the BNIP3-PI3K/Akt pathway. Pulsatilla saponin D inhibits invasion and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer cells through multiple targets and pathways. Quercetin improves heart failure by inhibiting cardiomyocyte apoptosis via suppressing the MAPK signaling pathway. Quercetin mediates the therapeutic effect of Centella asiatica on psoriasis by regulating STAT3 phosphorylation to inhibit the IL-23/IL-17A axis. Strategies for long-acting drug design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1