The diagnostic value of prolactin adjustment in bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for differentiating Cushing's disease from the ectopic ACTH syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"The diagnostic value of prolactin adjustment in bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for differentiating Cushing's disease from the ectopic ACTH syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Majid Valizadeh, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Dana Ramadhan Hussein, Farnaz Emdadi, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Ashley Grossman, Behnaz Abiri","doi":"10.1007/s11102-024-01474-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome can arise from a pituitary tumour (Cushing's disease) or an ectopic ACTH-secreting tumour, making precise differentiation essential for effective treatment. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is the gold standard for this differentiation, but false-negative results can limit its accuracy. Adding prolactin (PRL) measurement to BIPSS has been proposed to improve diagnostic precision. This meta-analysis evaluates how correction for prolactin levels ('prolactin adjustment') affects the diagnostic value of BIPSS in distinguishing Cushing's disease from ectopic ACTH syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to July 2024. Studies were included if they provided data on BIPSS with and without PRL adjustment for ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and diagnostic accuracy metrics were analysed using bivariate generalised linear mixed modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies with 310 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS with PRL adjustment were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 48.0 (95% CI: 19.0-123.0), with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.00 (95% CI: 1.9-4.7) and a negative LR of 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03-0.12). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). For BIPSS without PRL adjustment, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93) and specificity was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85), with a DOR of 27.0 (95% CI: 13.0-59.0). The SROC curve area was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94). Prolactin adjustment improved sensitivity (P < 0.01) without a significant change in specificity (P = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolactin adjustment in BIPSS slightly improves sensitivity for diagnosing Cushing's disease but does not enhance specificity for ectopic ACTH syndrome. This highlights the value of PRL measurement in improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing false negatives, while BIPSS remains crucial for ruling out EAS in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20202,"journal":{"name":"Pituitary","volume":"28 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pituitary","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-024-01474-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome can arise from a pituitary tumour (Cushing's disease) or an ectopic ACTH-secreting tumour, making precise differentiation essential for effective treatment. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is the gold standard for this differentiation, but false-negative results can limit its accuracy. Adding prolactin (PRL) measurement to BIPSS has been proposed to improve diagnostic precision. This meta-analysis evaluates how correction for prolactin levels ('prolactin adjustment') affects the diagnostic value of BIPSS in distinguishing Cushing's disease from ectopic ACTH syndrome.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to July 2024. Studies were included if they provided data on BIPSS with and without PRL adjustment for ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and diagnostic accuracy metrics were analysed using bivariate generalised linear mixed modelling.
Results: A total of 10 studies with 310 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS with PRL adjustment were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 48.0 (95% CI: 19.0-123.0), with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.00 (95% CI: 1.9-4.7) and a negative LR of 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03-0.12). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). For BIPSS without PRL adjustment, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93) and specificity was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85), with a DOR of 27.0 (95% CI: 13.0-59.0). The SROC curve area was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94). Prolactin adjustment improved sensitivity (P < 0.01) without a significant change in specificity (P = 0.13).
Conclusions: Prolactin adjustment in BIPSS slightly improves sensitivity for diagnosing Cushing's disease but does not enhance specificity for ectopic ACTH syndrome. This highlights the value of PRL measurement in improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing false negatives, while BIPSS remains crucial for ruling out EAS in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Pituitary is an international publication devoted to basic and clinical aspects of the pituitary gland. It is designed to publish original, high quality research in both basic and pituitary function as well as clinical pituitary disease.
The journal considers:
Biology of Pituitary Tumors
Mechanisms of Pituitary Hormone Secretion
Regulation of Pituitary Function
Prospective Clinical Studies of Pituitary Disease
Critical Basic and Clinical Reviews
Pituitary is directed at basic investigators, physiologists, clinical adult and pediatric endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and reproductive endocrinologists interested in the broad field of the pituitary and its disorders. The Editorial Board has been drawn from international experts in basic and clinical endocrinology. The journal offers a rapid turnaround time for review of manuscripts, and the high standard of the journal is maintained by a selective peer-review process which aims to publish only the highest quality manuscripts. Pituitary will foster the publication of creative scholarship as it pertains to the pituitary and will provide a forum for basic scientists and clinicians to publish their high quality pituitary-related work.