Budesonide nasal irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis of therapeutic outcomes and safety profile.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.349
N Magboul, A F Alharbi, A T Alqutub, S Almatrafi, A Alroqi, S H Aldousary, S R Alromaih, A S Alrasheed, S A Alsaleh
{"title":"Budesonide nasal irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis of therapeutic outcomes and safety profile.","authors":"N Magboul, A F Alharbi, A T Alqutub, S Almatrafi, A Alroqi, S H Aldousary, S R Alromaih, A S Alrasheed, S A Alsaleh","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corticosteroids are used in managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) through several formulations, including oral steroids and nasal sprays. More recently, incorporating concentrated budesonide respules into high-volume saline irrigations has been proposed to enhance the penetration of topical steroids into the paranasal sinuses. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of budesonide nasal irrigation (BNI) in managing CRS.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted independently from the eligible studies. In double-arm and single-arm meta-analyses, continuous outcomes were pooled using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies were reviewed, comprising 1464 patients. BNI had better outcomes than saline nasal irrigation (SNI) regarding Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (SNOT-22). Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy scores (LKES) changed from baseline. Regarding safety, there was no significant difference between BNI and SNI regarding Intraocular Pressure (IOP). Single-arm analysis showed a pooled mean serum cortisol level within the normal range after BNI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BNI demonstrated improved SNOT-22 and LKES scores, with normal post-treatment IOP and cortisol levels, indicating a beneficial impact on CRS while maintaining safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Corticosteroids are used in managing Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) through several formulations, including oral steroids and nasal sprays. More recently, incorporating concentrated budesonide respules into high-volume saline irrigations has been proposed to enhance the penetration of topical steroids into the paranasal sinuses. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of budesonide nasal irrigation (BNI) in managing CRS.

Methodology: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted independently from the eligible studies. In double-arm and single-arm meta-analyses, continuous outcomes were pooled using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Twenty-six studies were reviewed, comprising 1464 patients. BNI had better outcomes than saline nasal irrigation (SNI) regarding Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (SNOT-22). Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy scores (LKES) changed from baseline. Regarding safety, there was no significant difference between BNI and SNI regarding Intraocular Pressure (IOP). Single-arm analysis showed a pooled mean serum cortisol level within the normal range after BNI.

Conclusions: BNI demonstrated improved SNOT-22 and LKES scores, with normal post-treatment IOP and cortisol levels, indicating a beneficial impact on CRS while maintaining safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布地奈德鼻腔冲洗治疗慢性鼻窦炎:治疗结果和安全性的荟萃分析。
背景:皮质类固醇通过多种制剂用于治疗慢性鼻窦炎(CRS),包括口服类固醇和鼻腔喷雾剂。最近,已建议将浓缩布地奈德respules加入大容量盐水冲洗中,以增强局部类固醇对鼻窦的渗透。我们的目的是评价布地奈德鼻冲洗(BNI)治疗CRS的安全性和有效性。方法学:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。数据独立地从符合条件的研究中提取。在双臂和单臂荟萃分析中,使用95%置信区间(CI)的均值差(MD)对连续结果进行汇总。结果:回顾了26项研究,包括1464例患者。在鼻结果测试评分(SNOT-22)方面,BNI优于盐水鼻冲洗(SNI)。隆德-肯尼迪内窥镜评分(LKES)从基线开始改变。在安全性方面,BNI和SNI在眼压(IOP)方面无显著差异。单臂分析显示,BNI后合并的平均血清皮质醇水平在正常范围内。结论:BNI显示SNOT-22和LKES评分改善,治疗后IOP和皮质醇水平正常,表明在保持安全性的同时对CRS有有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1