SETTING AN AGENDA FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE THOUGHT OF ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) IN CONTEMPORARY PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND PSYCHOTHERAPY.

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Psychiatria Danubina Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.24869/psyd.2024.310
Trino Baptista, Felix Angeles, Laura Baptista, Charles I Abramson, Ignacio Sandia, Sonia Tucci
{"title":"SETTING AN AGENDA FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE THOUGHT OF ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) IN CONTEMPORARY PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND PSYCHOTHERAPY.","authors":"Trino Baptista, Felix Angeles, Laura Baptista, Charles I Abramson, Ignacio Sandia, Sonia Tucci","doi":"10.24869/psyd.2024.310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest in the German thinker Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), sometimes referred to as \"the psychologist of the \"will\", but scarce empirical research has been conducted on the relevance of his philosophy for psychology and psychiatry. Following his death, philosophers, psychologists, psychiatrists, artists, writers, and natural scientists commended him. However, he was harshly criticized by others, notably by Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. Schopenhauer entitled his capital work as \"The world as will and representation\" (1818). His key concept is the \"Will\" which refers to the metaphysical source of all that exists. He considered deliberate human actions as a small part of the whole Will, which is mostly unconscious, blind, and purposeless. While the primeval Will is unknowable, the inner perception of our body in wishing is the closest approximation to the Will. Living beings have a \"Representation\" of the Will. With this construct, Schopenhauer explored most areas of knowledge in his time. The Will's nature, conceived as a tendency or imperative to exist, unavoidably leads to normative self-centeredness in all living beings, and often to egoism and malice in humans. Notwithstanding, he envisioned a path for individual (but not collective) salvation based on aesthetic contemplation, compassion, and asceticism. After describing his text's plan, we propose that selected contemporary constructs of psychotherapy may meet Schopenhauer's path to individual salvation. This sets the basis for approaching Schopenhauer to standard and novel psychotherapeutic and psychoeducational tools, as we illustrate here in selected aspects of clinical cases. The psychological correlates of the Will as postulated by Schopenhauer, and the sharp prose by which he referred to human motivations, are his key contributions to contemporary psychotherapy and psychoeducation. Since Schopenhauer funded his thought on the natural sciences, it may also enrich the integrative trends in contemporary psychiatry and psychology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":"36 3-4","pages":"310-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2024.310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the German thinker Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), sometimes referred to as "the psychologist of the "will", but scarce empirical research has been conducted on the relevance of his philosophy for psychology and psychiatry. Following his death, philosophers, psychologists, psychiatrists, artists, writers, and natural scientists commended him. However, he was harshly criticized by others, notably by Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. Schopenhauer entitled his capital work as "The world as will and representation" (1818). His key concept is the "Will" which refers to the metaphysical source of all that exists. He considered deliberate human actions as a small part of the whole Will, which is mostly unconscious, blind, and purposeless. While the primeval Will is unknowable, the inner perception of our body in wishing is the closest approximation to the Will. Living beings have a "Representation" of the Will. With this construct, Schopenhauer explored most areas of knowledge in his time. The Will's nature, conceived as a tendency or imperative to exist, unavoidably leads to normative self-centeredness in all living beings, and often to egoism and malice in humans. Notwithstanding, he envisioned a path for individual (but not collective) salvation based on aesthetic contemplation, compassion, and asceticism. After describing his text's plan, we propose that selected contemporary constructs of psychotherapy may meet Schopenhauer's path to individual salvation. This sets the basis for approaching Schopenhauer to standard and novel psychotherapeutic and psychoeducational tools, as we illustrate here in selected aspects of clinical cases. The psychological correlates of the Will as postulated by Schopenhauer, and the sharp prose by which he referred to human motivations, are his key contributions to contemporary psychotherapy and psychoeducation. Since Schopenhauer funded his thought on the natural sciences, it may also enrich the integrative trends in contemporary psychiatry and psychology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为亚瑟·叔本华(1788-1860)的思想在当代精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的应用设定议程。
人们对德国思想家阿瑟·叔本华(Arthur Schopenhauer, 1788-1860)(有时被称为“意志心理学家”)越来越感兴趣,但关于他的哲学与心理学和精神病学的相关性的实证研究却很少。在他去世后,哲学家、心理学家、精神病学家、艺术家、作家和自然科学家都赞扬了他。然而,他受到了其他人的严厉批评,尤其是弗里德里希·尼采和马丁·海德格尔。叔本华将他的《资本论》命名为《作为意志和表象的世界》(1818)。他的关键概念是“意志”,指的是所有存在的形而上学来源。他认为有意的人类行为只是整个意志的一小部分,而整个意志大多是无意识的、盲目的和无目的的。虽然原始的意志是不可知的,但我们身体在愿望中的内在感知是最接近意志的。生物有意志的“代表”。叔本华用这个构想探索了他那个时代的大部分知识领域。意志的本质,被认为是一种存在的趋势或命令,不可避免地导致所有生物的规范性自我中心,并经常导致人类的利己主义和恶意。尽管如此,他还是设想了一条个人(而不是集体)的救赎之路,这条路是基于审美沉思、同情和禁欲主义的。在描述了他的文本的计划之后,我们提出,选择当代心理治疗的结构可能符合叔本华的个人救赎之路。这为接近叔本华的标准和新颖的心理治疗和心理教育工具奠定了基础,正如我们在这里通过临床病例的选择方面所说明的那样。叔本华所假设的意志的心理关联,以及他提到人类动机的尖锐散文,是他对当代心理治疗和心理教育的关键贡献。由于叔本华的自然科学思想,它也可能丰富了当代精神病学和心理学的整合趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
期刊最新文献
A HOLISTIC VIEW OF HEALTH. BLOOD DERIVED INFLAMMATORY MARKERS IN COMPLETED SUICIDE: RESULTS FROM A CASE-CONTROL STUDY. CHILDHOOD MENTAL TRAUMAS AND THE MEANING OF LIFE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF FORGIVENESS. COMPARISON OF VARIOUS PSYCHOLOGICAL HUMAN NEED MODELS WITH SCHEMA THERAPY. EFFECT OF DECEPTIVE VERSUS NON-DECEPTIVE PLACEBO ON PSYCHOMOTOR AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN HEALTHY ADULT HUMAN VOLUNTEERS: AN OPEN-LABEL CROSS-OVER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1