Comparison of different puncture needles used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of Gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (≤ 2 cm) with respect to the adequacy of specimen collection: study protocol for a multicenter randomized prospective trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08654-0
Yasunobu Yamashita, Reiko Ashida, Toshio Shimokawa, Tetsuya Ikeda, Osama Inatomi, Takashi Ogura, Yuzo Kodama, Kotaro Takeshita, Mamoru Takenaka, Akiko Tsujimoto, Yoshiki Nakai, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Masayuki Kitano
{"title":"Comparison of different puncture needles used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of Gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (≤ 2 cm) with respect to the adequacy of specimen collection: study protocol for a multicenter randomized prospective trial.","authors":"Yasunobu Yamashita, Reiko Ashida, Toshio Shimokawa, Tetsuya Ikeda, Osama Inatomi, Takashi Ogura, Yuzo Kodama, Kotaro Takeshita, Mamoru Takenaka, Akiko Tsujimoto, Yoshiki Nakai, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Masayuki Kitano","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08654-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs) range from benign to malignant. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is used widely for pathological diagnosis of SELs. Early diagnosis and treatment are important because all Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have some degree of malignant potential. Diagnosing SELs with EUS-FNB is more difficult than diagnosing other tumors because an accurate diagnosis of GIST requires a sufficient tissue sample for immunostaining, which is part of the diagnostic protocol. Moreover, EUS-FNB is less accurate for diagnosis based on samples from SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm. However, our retrospective study showed that more than 50% of patients with SELs ≤ 2 cm were diagnosed as GIST. Therefore, EUS-FNB needles are required with adequate sampling in SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm. Previously, we conducted a retrospective single-center study of SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm, and reported that EUS-FNB with a Fork-tip needle was superior to that with a Franseen needle in that the former acquires sufficient sample. This multicenter comparative open-label superiority study is designed to verify whether a 22G Fork-tip needle is superior to a 22G Franseen needle with respect to sample acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>Present study will randomly assign for 110 patients (55 in the Fork-tip needle group and 55 in the Franseen needle group) with SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm, all of whom are managed at one of the 10 participating endoscopic centers. The primary endpoint evaluates the superiority of a 22G Fork-tip needle over a 22G Franseen needle for collection of an adequate tissue specimen at the first puncture. The secondary endpoints compare successful puncture rate, procedure completion rate, number of adverse events, diagnostic suitability of the first puncture specimen for GIST, and the number of punctures required until adequate specimen collection.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The outcomes may provide insight into the optimal needle choice for diagnosis of SELs ≤ 2 cm, thereby aiding development of practice guidelines. Present study is expected to promote early definitive diagnosis of GISTs, thereby increasing the number of cases that can receive curative treatment and improving prognosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT; trial registration: jRCTs052230144). Registered December 13, 2023. (URL; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/re/reports/detail/76858 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08654-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs) range from benign to malignant. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is used widely for pathological diagnosis of SELs. Early diagnosis and treatment are important because all Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have some degree of malignant potential. Diagnosing SELs with EUS-FNB is more difficult than diagnosing other tumors because an accurate diagnosis of GIST requires a sufficient tissue sample for immunostaining, which is part of the diagnostic protocol. Moreover, EUS-FNB is less accurate for diagnosis based on samples from SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm. However, our retrospective study showed that more than 50% of patients with SELs ≤ 2 cm were diagnosed as GIST. Therefore, EUS-FNB needles are required with adequate sampling in SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm. Previously, we conducted a retrospective single-center study of SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm, and reported that EUS-FNB with a Fork-tip needle was superior to that with a Franseen needle in that the former acquires sufficient sample. This multicenter comparative open-label superiority study is designed to verify whether a 22G Fork-tip needle is superior to a 22G Franseen needle with respect to sample acquisition.

Methods/design: Present study will randomly assign for 110 patients (55 in the Fork-tip needle group and 55 in the Franseen needle group) with SELs measuring ≤ 2 cm, all of whom are managed at one of the 10 participating endoscopic centers. The primary endpoint evaluates the superiority of a 22G Fork-tip needle over a 22G Franseen needle for collection of an adequate tissue specimen at the first puncture. The secondary endpoints compare successful puncture rate, procedure completion rate, number of adverse events, diagnostic suitability of the first puncture specimen for GIST, and the number of punctures required until adequate specimen collection.

Discussion: The outcomes may provide insight into the optimal needle choice for diagnosis of SELs ≤ 2 cm, thereby aiding development of practice guidelines. Present study is expected to promote early definitive diagnosis of GISTs, thereby increasing the number of cases that can receive curative treatment and improving prognosis.

Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT; trial registration: jRCTs052230144). Registered December 13, 2023. (URL; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/re/reports/detail/76858 ).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声内镜引导下胃肠道上皮下病变(≤2 cm)细针活检不同穿刺针标本采集充分性的比较:一项多中心随机前瞻性试验的研究方案。
背景:胃肠道上皮下病变(SELs)从良性到恶性不等。内镜超声(EUS)引导下的细针活检(EUS- fnb)广泛应用于SELs的病理诊断。早期诊断和治疗是重要的,因为所有胃肠道间质瘤(gist)都有一定程度的恶性潜能。诊断伴有EUS-FNB的SELs比诊断其他肿瘤更困难,因为准确诊断GIST需要足够的组织样本进行免疫染色,这是诊断方案的一部分。此外,EUS-FNB对于基于≤2 cm的SELs样本的诊断准确性较低。然而,我们的回顾性研究显示,超过50%的SELs≤2 cm的患者被诊断为GIST。因此,在测量≤2 cm的sel中,需要EUS-FNB针进行充分采样。之前,我们对≤2 cm的SELs进行了回顾性单中心研究,并报道了使用叉尖针的EUS-FNB优于使用Franseen针,因为前者获得了足够的样本。这项多中心比较开放标签优势研究旨在验证22G叉尖针在样本采集方面是否优于22G Franseen针。方法/设计:本研究将随机分配110例SELs≤2 cm的患者(55例为叉尖针组,55例为Franseen针组),所有患者均在10个参与的内镜中心之一进行治疗。主要终点评估22G叉尖针比22G Franseen针在第一次穿刺时收集足够的组织标本的优越性。次要终点比较穿刺成功率、手术完成率、不良事件数量、第一次穿刺标本对GIST的诊断适用性,以及在足够的标本收集之前所需的穿刺次数。讨论:结果可能为诊断SELs≤2 cm的最佳针头选择提供见解,从而帮助制定实践指南。本研究有望促进胃肠道间质瘤的早期明确诊断,从而增加可接受根治性治疗的病例数,改善预后。试验注册:日本临床试验注册中心(JRCT;试验注册号:jRCTs052230144)。2023年12月13日注册。(URL;https://jrct.niph.go.jp/re/reports/detail/76858)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review. Effect of perioperative remote ischemic conditioning on myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The efficacy of computerized cognitive training in patients with coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment, no dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Opportunities and challenges to delivering a trial for depressive symptoms in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the Alpha-Stim-D randomised controlled trial. The effects of a nutritional intervention on the sports nutrition knowledge and nutritional status of track and field athletes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1