A Step Forward in Long COVID Research: Validating the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale.

Somayeh Pour Mohammadi, Razieh Etesamipour, Francisco Mercado Romero, Irene Peláez
{"title":"A Step Forward in Long COVID Research: Validating the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale.","authors":"Somayeh Pour Mohammadi, Razieh Etesamipour, Francisco Mercado Romero, Irene Peláez","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14120197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long COVID, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, includes a variety of enduring symptoms that endure beyond the acute phase of the illness, impacting multiple facets of patients' psychological and physical health. The persistent symptoms encompass fatigue, breathing difficulties, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive impairments, which can significantly affect daily functioning and overall quality of life. The objective of this study was to create and validate the accuracy of the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale, which is used to evaluate cognitive impairments resulting from a COVID-19 infection. This study was conducted in Iran between January and September 2023. It consisted of three phases: developing the scale, evaluating its content validity with experts, and validating its structure with 454 participants using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The exploratory factor analysis revealed two variables, namely memory and attention, which accounted for 40.38% of the variation. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the model's fit, with indices indicating satisfactory alignment: CMIN/DF = 2.80, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05, CFI = 0.93, and TLI = 0.92. The factor loadings were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and Cronbach's Alpha values indicated strong internal consistency (working memory = 0.81, attention = 0.80). These results affirm the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating cognitive deficiencies in individuals with long COVID. Its application in clinical and research environments aids in the prompt detection and tracking of the treatment of such impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 12","pages":"3001-3018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11675825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14120197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long COVID, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, includes a variety of enduring symptoms that endure beyond the acute phase of the illness, impacting multiple facets of patients' psychological and physical health. The persistent symptoms encompass fatigue, breathing difficulties, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive impairments, which can significantly affect daily functioning and overall quality of life. The objective of this study was to create and validate the accuracy of the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale, which is used to evaluate cognitive impairments resulting from a COVID-19 infection. This study was conducted in Iran between January and September 2023. It consisted of three phases: developing the scale, evaluating its content validity with experts, and validating its structure with 454 participants using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The exploratory factor analysis revealed two variables, namely memory and attention, which accounted for 40.38% of the variation. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the model's fit, with indices indicating satisfactory alignment: CMIN/DF = 2.80, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05, CFI = 0.93, and TLI = 0.92. The factor loadings were statistically significant (p < 0.001), and Cronbach's Alpha values indicated strong internal consistency (working memory = 0.81, attention = 0.80). These results affirm the Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating cognitive deficiencies in individuals with long COVID. Its application in clinical and research environments aids in the prompt detection and tracking of the treatment of such impairments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎长期研究的又一步:验证新冠肺炎后认知障碍量表
长期COVID,即SARS-CoV-2感染的急性后遗症,包括疾病急性期过后的各种持久症状,对患者的心理和身体健康造成多方面的影响。这些持久性症状包括疲劳、呼吸困难、肌肉骨骼疼痛和认知障碍,会严重影响日常功能和整体生活质量。本研究的目的是创建并验证 COVID 后认知障碍量表的准确性,该量表用于评估 COVID-19 感染导致的认知障碍。这项研究于 2023 年 1 月至 9 月在伊朗进行。研究分为三个阶段:开发量表、与专家一起评估其内容效度,以及使用探索性和确认性因子分析对 454 名参与者进行结构验证。探索性因子分析发现了两个变量,即记忆力和注意力,这两个变量占变异的 40.38%。确认性因子分析验证了模型的拟合性,其指数显示出令人满意的一致性:CMIN/DF=2.80,RMSEA=0.06,SRR=0.05,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.92。因子载荷具有统计学意义(p < 0.001),Cronbach's Alpha 值显示出很强的内部一致性(工作记忆 = 0.81,注意力 = 0.80)。这些结果证明,COVID 后认知障碍量表是评估长期 COVID 患者认知缺陷的有效而可靠的工具。它在临床和研究环境中的应用有助于及时发现和跟踪治疗这类缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Treatment Efficacy in Mental Health: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Model Tools and Mental Health Professionals. Effects of Parents' Smartphone Use on Children's Emotions, Behavior, and Subjective Well-Being. Health Disparities: The Emerging Trends and Pressing Challenges. Unlocking Patient Resistance to AI in Healthcare: A Psychological Exploration. Digital Competence of Rural Teachers in Depopulated Regions of Spain: A Bibliometric Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1