Optimal Duration of Antibiotic Therapy for Primary Osteomyelitis Discitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005244
Brandon Edelbach, Dylan Glaser, Ahmad K Almekkawi, James P Caruso, Ghewa Sbaiti, Salah G Aoun, Carlos A Bagley
{"title":"Optimal Duration of Antibiotic Therapy for Primary Osteomyelitis Discitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Brandon Edelbach, Dylan Glaser, Ahmad K Almekkawi, James P Caruso, Ghewa Sbaiti, Salah G Aoun, Carlos A Bagley","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic Review and Network-Meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review the literature on management of primary osteomyelitis discitis and perform a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of different antibiotic treatment durations.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary osteomyelitis discitis is a challenging condition with varying management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies reporting outcomes for treatment of primary osteomyelitis discitis were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed comparing antibiotic treatment durations of <4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, 8-12 weeks, and 12-16 weeks. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three articles with 4,233 patients were included. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative agent (57.6%). The 4-8 week antibiotic duration ranked highest across fixed-effect and random-effects models (SUCRA 0.8207 and 0.8343). The 12-16 week duration ranked highest in the fixed-effect model (SUCRA 0.8460) but dropped substantially in the random-effects model (SUCRA 0.3067). The <4 week duration showed mixed results. The 8-12 week duration consistently ranked lowest. No statistically significant differences were found between durations for symptomatic relief.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic therapy for 4-8 weeks may provide the optimal balance of efficacy and treatment duration for most patients with primary osteomyelitis discitis. However, treatment should be individualized based on clinical response. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify optimal management strategies for this complex condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic Review and Network-Meta-analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically review the literature on management of primary osteomyelitis discitis and perform a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of different antibiotic treatment durations.

Background: Primary osteomyelitis discitis is a challenging condition with varying management strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies reporting outcomes for treatment of primary osteomyelitis discitis were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed comparing antibiotic treatment durations of <4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, 8-12 weeks, and 12-16 weeks. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank treatment effectiveness.

Results: Sixty-three articles with 4,233 patients were included. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative agent (57.6%). The 4-8 week antibiotic duration ranked highest across fixed-effect and random-effects models (SUCRA 0.8207 and 0.8343). The 12-16 week duration ranked highest in the fixed-effect model (SUCRA 0.8460) but dropped substantially in the random-effects model (SUCRA 0.3067). The <4 week duration showed mixed results. The 8-12 week duration consistently ranked lowest. No statistically significant differences were found between durations for symptomatic relief.

Conclusion: Antibiotic therapy for 4-8 weeks may provide the optimal balance of efficacy and treatment duration for most patients with primary osteomyelitis discitis. However, treatment should be individualized based on clinical response. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify optimal management strategies for this complex condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性骨髓炎椎间盘炎抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
研究设计:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。目的:本研究旨在系统回顾有关原发性骨髓炎椎间盘炎治疗的文献,并进行网络荟萃分析,比较不同抗生素治疗时间的疗效。背景:原发性骨髓炎是一种具有挑战性的疾病,治疗策略多种多样。方法:进行全面的文献检索。报告原发性骨髓炎椎间盘炎治疗结果的研究被纳入。随机效应网络荟萃分析比较了抗生素治疗持续时间。结果:纳入63篇文章,4233例患者。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体(57.6%)。在固定效应和随机效应模型中,4-8周抗生素持续时间最高(SUCRA分别为0.8207和0.8343)。在固定效应模型中,12-16周的持续时间排名最高(SUCRA = 0.8460),而在随机效应模型中,持续时间大幅下降(SUCRA = 0.3067)。结论:对于大多数原发性骨髓炎椎间盘炎患者,抗生素治疗4 ~ 8周可提供最佳的疗效和治疗时间平衡。然而,治疗应根据临床反应进行个体化。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明这种复杂情况的最佳管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Morbidly Obese Patients Have Similar Clinical Outcomes and Recovery Kinetics After Minimally Invasive Decompression. Establishing a Benchmark for Iatrogenic Hemodilution and Blood Transfusion in Long-Segment Spine Fusion Surgery. Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure. The Impact of the Preoperative Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) Score on Short-Term Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion. Risk Factors of Failed Conservative Treatment for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1