Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5
Omaima O Arab, Mohammed Aldayan, Khalid Almowaizri, Ahmad Alghamdi, Jahad Alghamdi, Adel Alharf
{"title":"Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.","authors":"Omaima O Arab, Mohammed Aldayan, Khalid Almowaizri, Ahmad Alghamdi, Jahad Alghamdi, Adel Alharf","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) conducts inspections in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) to safeguard clinical trial integrity and protect the rights, safety, and welfare of study participants. These inspections ensure that trials are conducted in compliance with GCP and applicable laws.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to provide a description of GCP inspection findings, analyze their impact on the clinical trial ecosystem, and provide recommendations to improve clinical trial conduction in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was conducted on inspection reports, with two senior independent inspectors examining, collecting, and categorizing the data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the categorical variable via frequency distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 GCP inspections were performed between 2017 and 2023, totaling 722 observations from 116 (88.5%) inspection visits. The remaining 15 (11.5%) inspection visits recorded no observations. The highest number of visits were conducted in contract research organizations (CRO) (n = 50; 38.2%) with 118 observations, followed by clinical investigator sites (n = 46; 35.1%) with 313 observations, then bioequivalence (BE) centers (n = 33; 25.2%) with 256 observations, and the last 2 (1.5%) visits were conducted in phase I clinical trial units with 35 observations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study assesses GCP inspection reports and examines the types of deficiencies and their grades in each area. Observation categories and grades were found to vary by organization type, which indicates the need for specific action plans addressing each organization type separately. This report provided recommendations based on the most common findings to assist researchers and sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Saudi Arabia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) conducts inspections in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) to safeguard clinical trial integrity and protect the rights, safety, and welfare of study participants. These inspections ensure that trials are conducted in compliance with GCP and applicable laws.

Objectives: The study aims to provide a description of GCP inspection findings, analyze their impact on the clinical trial ecosystem, and provide recommendations to improve clinical trial conduction in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A review was conducted on inspection reports, with two senior independent inspectors examining, collecting, and categorizing the data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the categorical variable via frequency distributions.

Results: A total of 131 GCP inspections were performed between 2017 and 2023, totaling 722 observations from 116 (88.5%) inspection visits. The remaining 15 (11.5%) inspection visits recorded no observations. The highest number of visits were conducted in contract research organizations (CRO) (n = 50; 38.2%) with 118 observations, followed by clinical investigator sites (n = 46; 35.1%) with 313 observations, then bioequivalence (BE) centers (n = 33; 25.2%) with 256 observations, and the last 2 (1.5%) visits were conducted in phase I clinical trial units with 35 observations.

Conclusion: This study assesses GCP inspection reports and examines the types of deficiencies and their grades in each area. Observation categories and grades were found to vary by organization type, which indicates the need for specific action plans addressing each organization type separately. This report provided recommendations based on the most common findings to assist researchers and sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Saudi Arabia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特食品和药物管理局良好临床规范检查结果的描述性分析。
简介:沙特食品药品监督管理局(SFDA)按照良好临床规范(GCP)进行检查,以维护临床试验的完整性,保护研究参与者的权利、安全和福利。这些检查确保试验是按照GCP和适用法律进行的。目的:本研究旨在对GCP检查结果进行描述,分析其对临床试验生态系统的影响,并为改善沙特阿拉伯的临床试验开展提供建议。方法:对检查报告进行审查,由两名高级独立检查员对数据进行审查、收集和分类。描述性统计通过频率分布来总结分类变量。结果:2017年至2023年共进行了131次GCP检查,116次(88.5%)检查访问中共观察到722次。其余15次(11.5%)视察没有记录任何观察结果。访问次数最多的是合同研究组织(CRO) (n = 50;38.2%),共有118个观察点,其次是临床研究者点(n = 46;35.1%),共313个观察点,然后是生物等效性(BE)中心(n = 33;25.2%), 256次观察,最后2次(1.5%)访问在I期临床试验单位进行,有35次观察。结论:本研究评估了GCP检验报告,并检查了每个领域的缺陷类型及其等级。观察类别和职等因组织类型而异,这表明需要分别针对每一组织类型制定具体的行动计划。该报告根据最常见的发现提供了建议,以协助研究人员和赞助者在沙特阿拉伯进行临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Impact of Rule 11 on the European Medical Software Landscape: Analysis of EUDAMED and Further Databases Three Years After MDR Implementation. Basic Considerations for Data Pooling Strategy in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCTs). Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development by Overcoming Existing Differences in Regional Regulatory Requirements - Outcomes of a Descriptive Review. A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey. A Five-Year Analysis of Market Share and Sales Growth for Original Drugs after Patent Expiration in Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1