Risk of Post-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Patients with Stenosis of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123611
Yasoda Satpathy, Pishtiwan Ahmaki, Jubran H. Jubran, Joseph D. Ciacci, David R. Santiago-Dieppa, Martin H. Pham, Alexander A. Khalessi, Brian R. Hirshman
{"title":"Risk of Post-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Patients with Stenosis of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yasoda Satpathy,&nbsp;Pishtiwan Ahmaki,&nbsp;Jubran H. Jubran,&nbsp;Joseph D. Ciacci,&nbsp;David R. Santiago-Dieppa,&nbsp;Martin H. Pham,&nbsp;Alexander A. Khalessi,&nbsp;Brian R. Hirshman","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cervical stenosis (CS) is the pathologic narrowing of the central canal of the cervical spine. It is often incidentally discovered. It is unclear whether pre-existing CS can lead to worse outcomes and higher incidences of post-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies collected using the keywords \"cervical stenosis\" AND (“trauma” OR “injury”). About 381 articles were collected from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, and 2675 patients from 7 studies were included in the final analyses. Neo-Bayesian statistics were used to estimate a number needed to treat.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a meta-analysis of studies with internal controls, patients with pre-existing CS are not at a higher risk of post-traumatic SCI (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–9.50). However, CS patients have a greater incidence of SCI (0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.56) compared to patients without CS (0.18, 95% CI 0.14–0.22). Patients with CS were also over-represented in the population of SCI patients (0.46, 95% CI 0.27; 0.65). Using neo-Bayesian statistics, we estimate that 70 patients with CS must be treated to prevent one SCI. In patients who participate in higher-risk physical activities, the number needed to treat may be lower.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Though patients with pre-existing CS do not have higher odds of SCI in studies with internal controls, we find that patients with CS do have higher incidences of SCI and are over-represented in the population of SCI patients. In select CS patients with active lifestyles, close follow-up and consideration of various treatment options may be indicated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 123611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024020618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cervical stenosis (CS) is the pathologic narrowing of the central canal of the cervical spine. It is often incidentally discovered. It is unclear whether pre-existing CS can lead to worse outcomes and higher incidences of post-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies collected using the keywords "cervical stenosis" AND (“trauma” OR “injury”). About 381 articles were collected from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, and 2675 patients from 7 studies were included in the final analyses. Neo-Bayesian statistics were used to estimate a number needed to treat.

Results

In a meta-analysis of studies with internal controls, patients with pre-existing CS are not at a higher risk of post-traumatic SCI (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–9.50). However, CS patients have a greater incidence of SCI (0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.56) compared to patients without CS (0.18, 95% CI 0.14–0.22). Patients with CS were also over-represented in the population of SCI patients (0.46, 95% CI 0.27; 0.65). Using neo-Bayesian statistics, we estimate that 70 patients with CS must be treated to prevent one SCI. In patients who participate in higher-risk physical activities, the number needed to treat may be lower.

Conclusions

Though patients with pre-existing CS do not have higher odds of SCI in studies with internal controls, we find that patients with CS do have higher incidences of SCI and are over-represented in the population of SCI patients. In select CS patients with active lifestyles, close follow-up and consideration of various treatment options may be indicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎狭窄患者创伤后脊髓损伤的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
颈椎狭窄症(CS)是颈椎中央椎管的病理性狭窄。它常常是偶然发现的。目前尚不清楚先前存在的CS是否会导致更糟糕的结果和更高的创伤后脊髓损伤(SCI)发生率。方法:我们对以“颈椎狭窄”和(“创伤”或“损伤”)为关键词收集的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。从Pubmed、Embase和Cochrane中收集了381篇文章,最终分析了来自7项研究的2675名患者。新贝叶斯统计用于估计治疗所需的数量(NNT)。结果:在一项内部对照研究的荟萃分析中,已有CS的患者发生创伤后脊髓损伤的风险并不更高(OR 2.73, 95% CI 0.78-9.50)。然而,与没有CS的患者(0.18,95%-CI 0.14-0.22)相比,CS患者的SCI发生率更高(0.41,95%-CI 0.26-0.56)。脊髓损伤患者中CS患者的比例也过高(0.46,95% ci 0.27;0.65)。使用新贝叶斯统计,我们估计70例CS患者必须接受治疗才能预防1例SCI。在参加高风险体育活动的患者中,NNT可能更低。结论:虽然在有内部控制的研究中,已有CS的患者发生SCI的几率并不高,但我们发现CS患者发生SCI的几率确实更高,并且在SCI患者中比例过高。在选择生活方式积极的CS患者中,可能需要密切随访并考虑各种治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Using Cross-Puncture in the Treatment of Genant Grade 0–1 Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Obesity and Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Single-Level Transforaminal versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Vertebral Augmentation plus Pedicle Screw Fixation versus Vertebral Augmentation Alone in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis 3D Slicer–Assisted Preoperative Planning Enhances Hematoma Evacuation in Stereotactic Aspiration for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Shaping the Future of Neuro-Oncologic Surgery: Emerging Imaging Tools and Their Impact on Surgical Precision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1