Pharmacists as independent prescribers in community pharmacy: A scoping review.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.008
Zoubida Mesbahi, Celia Piquer-Martinez, Shalom I Benrimoj, Fernando Martinez-Martinez, Noelia Amador-Fernandez, Maria Jose Zarzuelo, Sarah Dineen-Griffin, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
{"title":"Pharmacists as independent prescribers in community pharmacy: A scoping review.","authors":"Zoubida Mesbahi, Celia Piquer-Martinez, Shalom I Benrimoj, Fernando Martinez-Martinez, Noelia Amador-Fernandez, Maria Jose Zarzuelo, Sarah Dineen-Griffin, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing interest in granting prescribing rights to pharmacists as a strategy to improve healthcare access. Researchers continue to explore the impact and implementation of pharmacist prescribing. Given the recent international changes in this field, an overview of current territories allowing pharmacist independent prescribing would provide a comprehensive understanding for researchers and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This scoping review aims to summarize the countries and specific jurisdictions where pharmacists can prescribe independently in community pharmacy, and map the conditions they can prescribe for, required training, and reimbursement policies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This scoping review was conducted in October 2024 and has been reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, along with grey literature searches using Google.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 studies and reports were identified. The countries where pharmacist can prescribe independently include the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, Poland, Switzerland, and Denmark. Pharmacists authorized as independent prescribers generally require post-registration training and are authorized to initiate, adapt, renew, or substitute prescriptions. For the payment and reimbursement, this service is publicly funded only in Canada, Denmark, France, and the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist prescribing practices vary significantly worldwide, with differences in terminology, legislation, and training requirements. This scoping review provides the necessary information to visualize and conceptualize the current scope of pharmacist independent prescribers, offering a foundation for advancing this practice in new jurisdictions. Further research should address current models in under-studied regions, explore the scope for pharmacists to prescribe for undiagnosed conditions, and analyze payment structures in non-funded jurisdictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been a growing interest in granting prescribing rights to pharmacists as a strategy to improve healthcare access. Researchers continue to explore the impact and implementation of pharmacist prescribing. Given the recent international changes in this field, an overview of current territories allowing pharmacist independent prescribing would provide a comprehensive understanding for researchers and policymakers.

Aim: This scoping review aims to summarize the countries and specific jurisdictions where pharmacists can prescribe independently in community pharmacy, and map the conditions they can prescribe for, required training, and reimbursement policies.

Method: This scoping review was conducted in October 2024 and has been reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, along with grey literature searches using Google.

Results: A total of 88 studies and reports were identified. The countries where pharmacist can prescribe independently include the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, Poland, Switzerland, and Denmark. Pharmacists authorized as independent prescribers generally require post-registration training and are authorized to initiate, adapt, renew, or substitute prescriptions. For the payment and reimbursement, this service is publicly funded only in Canada, Denmark, France, and the United Kingdom.

Conclusion: Pharmacist prescribing practices vary significantly worldwide, with differences in terminology, legislation, and training requirements. This scoping review provides the necessary information to visualize and conceptualize the current scope of pharmacist independent prescribers, offering a foundation for advancing this practice in new jurisdictions. Further research should address current models in under-studied regions, explore the scope for pharmacists to prescribe for undiagnosed conditions, and analyze payment structures in non-funded jurisdictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师作为社区药房的独立开处方者:范围综述。
背景:越来越多的人对授予药剂师处方权作为改善医疗保健服务的一种策略感兴趣。研究人员继续探索药剂师处方的影响和实施。鉴于该领域最近的国际变化,对目前允许药剂师独立开处方的地区进行概述将为研究人员和政策制定者提供全面的了解。目的:这个范围审查的目的是总结国家和特定的司法管辖区,药剂师可以在社区药房独立开处方,并绘制条件,他们可以开处方,所需的培训和报销政策。方法:该范围审查于2024年10月进行,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报道。检索在Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行,同时使用谷歌进行灰色文献检索。结果:共纳入88项研究和报告。药剂师可以独立开处方的国家包括英国、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、波兰、瑞士和丹麦。被授权为独立开处方者的药剂师通常需要注册后培训,并被授权开始、调整、更新或替代处方。对于支付和报销,这项服务仅在加拿大、丹麦、法国和英国由政府资助。结论:世界各地的药剂师处方实践差异很大,在术语、立法和培训要求方面存在差异。这一范围审查提供了必要的信息,以可视化和概念化药剂师独立开处方者的当前范围,为在新的司法管辖区推进这一实践提供了基础。进一步的研究应针对研究不足地区的现有模式,探索药剂师为未确诊疾病开药的范围,并分析无资助管辖区的支付结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
A deep neural network model for classifying pharmacy practice publications into research domains. Why are pharmacy technicians leaving? Factors contributing to turnover intention and strategies for retention. The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications. The association between falls and fall-risk-increasing drugs among older patients in out-patient clinics: A retrospective cohort, single center study. Identifying critical elements in using question prompt lists at the pharmacy counter to induce patient activation-using principles of conversation analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1