Salivary Cortisol Concentration Is an Objective Measure of the Physiological Response to Loud Music.

IF 2.1 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology Research Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.3390/audiolres14060090
Robert Tomljenović, Andro Košec, Livije Kalogjera, Ivana Ćelap, Domagoj Marijančević, Davor Vagić
{"title":"Salivary Cortisol Concentration Is an Objective Measure of the Physiological Response to Loud Music.","authors":"Robert Tomljenović, Andro Košec, Livije Kalogjera, Ivana Ćelap, Domagoj Marijančević, Davor Vagić","doi":"10.3390/audiolres14060090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: This study examines the potential associations between salivary cortisol concentrations and subjective stress test scores in healthy individuals subjected to sound-related, psychological, and physical stressors. <b>Methods</b>: This study employed a single-center observational cross-sectional design, with a sample size of 36 subjects recruited from a tertiary referral audiology center. Between 2023 and 2024, the study recruited subjects with normal hearing, baseline salivary cortisol levels, and subjective stress levels. The participants were requested to complete an STAI-Y1 questionnaire and provide salivary cortisol samples before and following exposure to sound-related, psychological, and physical stress tests. <b>Results</b>: Exposure to psychological and physical stressors significantly increased STAI-Y1 scores (Friedman's test, χ<sup>2</sup> = 57.118, df = 2, <i>p</i> = 0.377). This increase was greater than that observed in response to loud, favorite music (Friedman's test, χ<sup>2</sup> = 57.118, df = 2, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The salivary cortisol concentration significantly increased in all three provocation tests (Friedman's test, χ<sup>2</sup> = 95.264, df = 5, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Furthermore, there is no significant difference in salivary cortisol concentrations between the three pre-test and post-test measurement intervals, indicating a comparable stress-inducing pattern regardless of the nature of the stimulus (Friedman's test, χ<sup>2</sup> = 95.264, df = 5, <i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: Exposure to loud favorite music increases salivary cortisol concentrations, as does acute physical and psychological stress. Interestingly, unlike psychological and physical stress, loud music was not objectively perceived as stress, which may mask the physiological signs of stress, potentially increasing the risk of both acute and chronic stress-related health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"14 6","pages":"1093-1104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14060090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the potential associations between salivary cortisol concentrations and subjective stress test scores in healthy individuals subjected to sound-related, psychological, and physical stressors. Methods: This study employed a single-center observational cross-sectional design, with a sample size of 36 subjects recruited from a tertiary referral audiology center. Between 2023 and 2024, the study recruited subjects with normal hearing, baseline salivary cortisol levels, and subjective stress levels. The participants were requested to complete an STAI-Y1 questionnaire and provide salivary cortisol samples before and following exposure to sound-related, psychological, and physical stress tests. Results: Exposure to psychological and physical stressors significantly increased STAI-Y1 scores (Friedman's test, χ2 = 57.118, df = 2, p = 0.377). This increase was greater than that observed in response to loud, favorite music (Friedman's test, χ2 = 57.118, df = 2, p < 0.0001). The salivary cortisol concentration significantly increased in all three provocation tests (Friedman's test, χ2 = 95.264, df = 5, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, there is no significant difference in salivary cortisol concentrations between the three pre-test and post-test measurement intervals, indicating a comparable stress-inducing pattern regardless of the nature of the stimulus (Friedman's test, χ2 = 95.264, df = 5, p > 0.05). Conclusions: Exposure to loud favorite music increases salivary cortisol concentrations, as does acute physical and psychological stress. Interestingly, unlike psychological and physical stress, loud music was not objectively perceived as stress, which may mask the physiological signs of stress, potentially increasing the risk of both acute and chronic stress-related health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液皮质醇浓度是对大声音乐生理反应的客观测量。
目的:本研究探讨了健康个体受到声音相关、心理和生理压力源时唾液皮质醇浓度与主观压力测试分数之间的潜在关联。方法:本研究采用单中心观察性横断面设计,样本量为36名来自三级转诊听力学中心的受试者。在2023年至2024年期间,该研究招募了听力正常、唾液皮质醇基线水平和主观压力水平正常的受试者。参与者被要求完成一份STAI-Y1问卷,并在进行与声音相关的心理和身体压力测试之前和之后提供唾液皮质醇样本。结果:心理和生理应激源暴露显著提高了STAI-Y1评分(χ2 = 57.118, df = 2, p = 0.377)。这一增长大于对大声喜爱的音乐的反应(Friedman检验,χ2 = 57.118, df = 2, p < 0.0001)。三种激发试验中唾液皮质醇浓度均显著升高(Friedman’s检验,χ2 = 95.264, df = 5, p < 0.0001)。此外,唾液皮质醇浓度在三个测试前和测试后测量区间之间没有显著差异,表明无论刺激的性质如何,都存在类似的应激诱导模式(Friedman检验,χ2 = 95.264, df = 5, p > 0.05)。结论:听到最喜欢的大声音乐会增加唾液皮质醇浓度,就像急性生理和心理压力一样。有趣的是,与心理和生理压力不同,大声的音乐并没有被客观地视为压力,这可能掩盖了压力的生理迹象,潜在地增加了急性和慢性压力相关健康结果的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Across Multiple Hearing Domains. Can Hearing Aids Improve Physical Activity in Adults with Hearing Loss? A Feasibility Study. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Total Score: What Really Counts? Experience on a Sample of 1156 Patients. Visual Reliance in Severe Hearing Loss: Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) Study. Predictive Factors for Hearing Loss in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1