Tailored Multifaceted Strategy for Implementing Fundamental Evidence-Based Nursing Care: An Evaluation Study.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.3390/nursrep14040297
Signe Eekholm, Karin Samuelson, Gerd Ahlström, Tove Lindhardt
{"title":"Tailored Multifaceted Strategy for Implementing Fundamental Evidence-Based Nursing Care: An Evaluation Study.","authors":"Signe Eekholm, Karin Samuelson, Gerd Ahlström, Tove Lindhardt","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Extensive research has emphasised the persistent challenges and failures in providing hospitalised patients with fundamental evidence-based nursing care, often resulting in grave consequences for patient safety. Recommendations from implementation research indicate that a tailored theory- and research-based implementation strategy targeting contextual determinants can optimise the implementation of evidence-based clinical practice for the benefit of patients. This study evaluated the feasibility of an implementation strategy designed to improve the quality of nursing care by targeting behavioural and environmental barriers in a hospital setting. <b>Methods</b>: Proctor's conceptual model for implementation was applied to evaluate the strategy based on eight outcomes: adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, feasibility, penetration, sustainability, and costs. Data collection methods included field observations, informal and focus group interviews, registrations, and audits of electronic patient records. <b>Results</b>: The strategy was adoptive, acceptable, appropriate, and feasible in targeting complex environmental and behavioural determinants (at the individual, team, and management level), enabling successful implementation of fundamental evidence-based nursing care. However, fidelity, feasibility, and sustainability were challenged by competing organisational demands and time constraints. <b>Conclusions</b>: The tailored, multifaceted strategy proved effective in addressing complex environmental and behavioural determinants across multiple levels, facilitating the implementation of fundamental evidence-based nursing care in a clinical practice. Further testing and larger-scale studies is needed to assess the strategy's transferability and its impact on nursing-sensitive patient outcomes in different clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"4070-4090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Extensive research has emphasised the persistent challenges and failures in providing hospitalised patients with fundamental evidence-based nursing care, often resulting in grave consequences for patient safety. Recommendations from implementation research indicate that a tailored theory- and research-based implementation strategy targeting contextual determinants can optimise the implementation of evidence-based clinical practice for the benefit of patients. This study evaluated the feasibility of an implementation strategy designed to improve the quality of nursing care by targeting behavioural and environmental barriers in a hospital setting. Methods: Proctor's conceptual model for implementation was applied to evaluate the strategy based on eight outcomes: adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, feasibility, penetration, sustainability, and costs. Data collection methods included field observations, informal and focus group interviews, registrations, and audits of electronic patient records. Results: The strategy was adoptive, acceptable, appropriate, and feasible in targeting complex environmental and behavioural determinants (at the individual, team, and management level), enabling successful implementation of fundamental evidence-based nursing care. However, fidelity, feasibility, and sustainability were challenged by competing organisational demands and time constraints. Conclusions: The tailored, multifaceted strategy proved effective in addressing complex environmental and behavioural determinants across multiple levels, facilitating the implementation of fundamental evidence-based nursing care in a clinical practice. Further testing and larger-scale studies is needed to assess the strategy's transferability and its impact on nursing-sensitive patient outcomes in different clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施基础循证护理的量身定制的多方面策略:一项评估研究。
背景/目的:广泛的研究强调了在为住院患者提供基本循证护理方面持续存在的挑战和失败,往往会对患者安全造成严重后果。实施研究的建议表明,针对上下文决定因素的量身定制的基于理论和研究的实施策略可以优化基于证据的临床实践的实施,从而使患者受益。本研究评估了一项实施策略的可行性,该策略旨在通过针对医院环境中的行为和环境障碍来提高护理质量。方法:应用Proctor的实施概念模型,基于八个结果对战略进行评估:采用率、可接受性、适当性、保真度、可行性、渗透率、可持续性和成本。数据收集方法包括实地观察、非正式访谈和焦点小组访谈、登记和电子病历审计。结果:该策略在针对复杂的环境和行为决定因素(在个人、团队和管理层面)方面是可采纳的、可接受的、适当的和可行的,使基础循证护理得以成功实施。然而,保真度、可行性和可持续性受到竞争组织需求和时间限制的挑战。结论:量身定制的、多方面的策略被证明在多个层面上解决复杂的环境和行为决定因素是有效的,促进了基础循证护理在临床实践中的实施。需要进一步的测试和更大规模的研究来评估该策略的可转移性及其对不同临床环境中护理敏感患者结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of the Pediatric Well-Being Picture Scale© Using a Mixed-Methods Research Design. Maternal Birth Satisfaction Relating to Intraoperative and Early Postpartum Skin-to-Skin Contact with the Neonate During Caesarean Birth: An Integrative Review. Identification of Health Needs in Ukrainian Refugees Seen in a Primary Care Facility in Tenerife, Spain. Translation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI) in Nursing Students. Analyzing Predictive Factors for the Media's Impact on the Nursing Profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1