Effect of Self-Measuring Blood Pressure Program on Hypertension Control: Analysis by Diabetes Status, Age, Gender, and Race in Rural Arizona.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.3390/clinpract14060208
Joy Luzingu, Aminata Kilungo, Randall Flores, Zoe Baccam, Tenneh Turner-Warren, Thelma Reis, Babasola Okusanya, John Ehiri
{"title":"Effect of Self-Measuring Blood Pressure Program on Hypertension Control: Analysis by Diabetes Status, Age, Gender, and Race in Rural Arizona.","authors":"Joy Luzingu, Aminata Kilungo, Randall Flores, Zoe Baccam, Tenneh Turner-Warren, Thelma Reis, Babasola Okusanya, John Ehiri","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14060208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural areas face numerous health challenges, including workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and delayed care. These disparities can be mitigated by self-management interventions for diseases such as hypertension. This study assessed the implementation of a Self-Measuring Blood Pressure (SMBP) program in rural Arizona, documenting its barriers and patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this before-after study, participants were loaned a digital device which they used to self-measure and record blood pressure (BP) over 1 week or more for hypertension diagnosis or 4 weeks or more for monitoring. Blood pressure (BP) control was assessed per the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. BP changes between baseline and post-program were assessed using paired-Student t tests. Effect modification by diabetes was analyzed using stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 740 participants, significant associations were found with gender, age, and controlled BP among non-diabetic patients. Post-intervention, 63.4% of diabetic patients showed controlled BP, and 25.7% of non-diabetic patients had controlled BP, with higher control rates among females and older age groups (60-79 years). Baseline mean SBP was 148.3 ± 19.6 mmHg, improving to 133.9 ± 14.6 mmHg; baseline DBP was 88.5 ± 33.6 mmHg, improving to 83.4 ± 9.6 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SMBP program effectively controlled BP, highlighting the value of combining clinical care with telemonitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 6","pages":"2637-2649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14060208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rural areas face numerous health challenges, including workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and delayed care. These disparities can be mitigated by self-management interventions for diseases such as hypertension. This study assessed the implementation of a Self-Measuring Blood Pressure (SMBP) program in rural Arizona, documenting its barriers and patient experiences.

Methods: In this before-after study, participants were loaned a digital device which they used to self-measure and record blood pressure (BP) over 1 week or more for hypertension diagnosis or 4 weeks or more for monitoring. Blood pressure (BP) control was assessed per the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. BP changes between baseline and post-program were assessed using paired-Student t tests. Effect modification by diabetes was analyzed using stratification.

Results: Among 740 participants, significant associations were found with gender, age, and controlled BP among non-diabetic patients. Post-intervention, 63.4% of diabetic patients showed controlled BP, and 25.7% of non-diabetic patients had controlled BP, with higher control rates among females and older age groups (60-79 years). Baseline mean SBP was 148.3 ± 19.6 mmHg, improving to 133.9 ± 14.6 mmHg; baseline DBP was 88.5 ± 33.6 mmHg, improving to 83.4 ± 9.6 mmHg.

Conclusions: The SMBP program effectively controlled BP, highlighting the value of combining clinical care with telemonitoring.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我测量血压计划对高血压控制的影响:亚利桑那农村糖尿病状况、年龄、性别和种族的分析
背景:农村地区面临许多卫生挑战,包括劳动力短缺、培训机会有限和护理延误。这些差异可以通过对高血压等疾病的自我管理干预来缓解。本研究评估了在亚利桑那州农村实施的自我测量血压(SMBP)计划,记录了其障碍和患者体验。方法:在这项前后对照研究中,受试者使用数字设备自我测量和记录血压(BP) 1周或更长时间,用于高血压诊断或4周或更长时间的监测。根据美国心脏协会和美国糖尿病协会的指南评估血压(BP)控制。使用配对学生t检验评估基线和计划后的血压变化。采用分层法分析糖尿病对疗效的影响。结果:在740名参与者中,非糖尿病患者的血压与性别、年龄和控制血压有显著相关性。干预后,63.4%的糖尿病患者血压得到控制,25.7%的非糖尿病患者血压得到控制,其中女性和年龄较大的人群(60-79岁)控制率较高。基线平均收缩压为148.3±19.6 mmHg,改善至133.9±14.6 mmHg;基线DBP为88.5±33.6 mmHg,改善至83.4±9.6 mmHg。结论:SMBP程序有效控制血压,突出临床护理与远程监测相结合的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contribution of Final-Year Medical Students to Hypertension Diagnosis in Primary Care Units. Urinary Tract Infections and Bacterial Multidrug Resistance in Kidney Transplant Impact on Function and Graft Survival. The Use and Effectiveness of Different Emergency Contraception Methods Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in a Greek Clinic: A Cross-Sectional, Comparative, Observational Study. Does Thyroid Dysfunction Have a Role in the Etiology of Vocal Fold Edema? Role of Cerebral Oximetry in Reducing Postoperative End-Organ Dysfunction After Major Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1