UPJE: Most pharmacy law educators have heard of it, but support remains divided

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102266
Rachel E. Barenie , Ettie Rosenberg , Geoffrey Mospan , Gina Moore
{"title":"UPJE: Most pharmacy law educators have heard of it, but support remains divided","authors":"Rachel E. Barenie ,&nbsp;Ettie Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Mospan ,&nbsp;Gina Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most states require pharmacists to successfully pass the Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) required by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) to obtain licensure as a pharmacist, though pass rates for the MPJE have declined in recent years. Meanwhile, NABP is pursing efforts to standardize the exam with the emergent Uniform Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (UPJE).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the current thinking of pharmacy law educators across the US on the UPJE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Pharmacy Law Educators Subcommittee of the American Society of Pharmacy Law (ASPL) surveyed pharmacy law educators across US pharmacy programs to characterize their current thinking on UPJE in May 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 78 educators that responded (61 % response rate), most had heard of the UPJE, while support for it was divided. Portability of licensure was an opportunity frequently identified, though on the other hand, an inability to assess state-specific law variations leading to potential concerns and about practice-readiness, was a common challenge noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Whether widespread adoption of the UPJE will be successful is unknown, but pharmacy law educators will still need to effectively teach both federal and state law, balancing licensure preparation with practice-readiness, and organizations leading these efforts must use data to inform their policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 102266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most states require pharmacists to successfully pass the Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (MPJE) required by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) to obtain licensure as a pharmacist, though pass rates for the MPJE have declined in recent years. Meanwhile, NABP is pursing efforts to standardize the exam with the emergent Uniform Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (UPJE).

Objective

This study aimed to describe the current thinking of pharmacy law educators across the US on the UPJE.

Methods

The Pharmacy Law Educators Subcommittee of the American Society of Pharmacy Law (ASPL) surveyed pharmacy law educators across US pharmacy programs to characterize their current thinking on UPJE in May 2024.

Results

Of 78 educators that responded (61 % response rate), most had heard of the UPJE, while support for it was divided. Portability of licensure was an opportunity frequently identified, though on the other hand, an inability to assess state-specific law variations leading to potential concerns and about practice-readiness, was a common challenge noted.

Conclusions

Whether widespread adoption of the UPJE will be successful is unknown, but pharmacy law educators will still need to effectively teach both federal and state law, balancing licensure preparation with practice-readiness, and organizations leading these efforts must use data to inform their policy decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UPJE:大多数药法教育者都听说过它,但支持仍然存在分歧。
背景:大多数州要求药剂师成功通过由国家药学委员会协会(NABP)要求的多州药学法学考试(MPJE),以获得药剂师执照,尽管近年来MPJE的通过率有所下降。与此同时,NABP正在努力通过紧急的统一药学法学考试(UPJE)来使考试标准化。目的:本研究旨在描述当前美国药法教育工作者对UPJE的看法。方法:美国药法学会(ASPL)的药法教育小组委员会调查了美国药学专业的药法教育工作者,以表征他们目前对UPJE的看法。结果:在78名接受调查的教育工作者中(61%的回复率),大多数人都听说过UPJE,而对它的支持则存在分歧。许可证的可移植性是一个经常被发现的机会,但另一方面,无法评估导致潜在问题的各州具体法律差异和对实践准备情况的担忧是一个共同的挑战。结论:UPJE的广泛采用是否会成功是未知的,但是药法教育者仍然需要有效地教授联邦和州法律,平衡许可证准备和实践准备,领导这些努力的组织必须使用数据来告知他们的政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
First professional year student Pharmacists' approaches to resolving drug diversion incidents in a community pharmacy simulation Pharmacy faculty perspectives about implementing competency-based education in pharmacy education Embedding pharmacy practice, veterinary pharmacy, and environmental pharmacy to implement ‘One Health’ in pharmacy education Addressing systemic racism and its influence on health disparities through a foundational pharmacy course and a student-led symposium Apply the 4 lenses to the self-study process to identify blind spots and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1