Development of a capstone exam as pre-advanced pharmacy practice experiences domains assessment

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102240
Michael R. Gionfriddo , Gale E. Garmong , Michael W. Perry , Autumn Stewart-Lynch , Pamela H. Koerner
{"title":"Development of a capstone exam as pre-advanced pharmacy practice experiences domains assessment","authors":"Michael R. Gionfriddo ,&nbsp;Gale E. Garmong ,&nbsp;Michael W. Perry ,&nbsp;Autumn Stewart-Lynch ,&nbsp;Pamela H. Koerner","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) standards require pharmacy schools to assess Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness. This paper describes the development and implementation of a Capstone Exam for assessing APPE-readiness and exploration of potential correlations between student performance on the Exam and performance measures within the didactic curriculum.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Faculty developed a Capstone examination aligned to the Pre-APPE Domains in Appendix A of the ACPE standards consisting of five stations assessing skills, which include: interviewing, counseling, prescription checking, professional communication, and inpatient order verification. Administered in the spring semester of the third professional year, students must pass all stations to progress to APPEs. Relationships between pass rates for student cohorts in the class of 2017–2023 and grade point average (GPA) and course deficiencies were explored using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Since 2016, first-attempt pass rates fluctuated between 20.3 % and 51.2 % with variability in performance observed across stations and class cohorts. Students with higher GPAs were more likely to pass all stations on the first attempt. Although history of a course deficiency did not affect overall pass rates, it was associated with lower odds of passing the interviewing and order verification stations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A Capstone Exam model fulfills the requirements in ACPE Standard 25.8 using a sustainable approach and has supported curricular continuous quality improvement. Findings regarding predictive value of GPA and prior course deficiencies may enable identifying students who would benefit from additional preparation<strong>.</strong></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 102240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) standards require pharmacy schools to assess Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness. This paper describes the development and implementation of a Capstone Exam for assessing APPE-readiness and exploration of potential correlations between student performance on the Exam and performance measures within the didactic curriculum.

Methods

Faculty developed a Capstone examination aligned to the Pre-APPE Domains in Appendix A of the ACPE standards consisting of five stations assessing skills, which include: interviewing, counseling, prescription checking, professional communication, and inpatient order verification. Administered in the spring semester of the third professional year, students must pass all stations to progress to APPEs. Relationships between pass rates for student cohorts in the class of 2017–2023 and grade point average (GPA) and course deficiencies were explored using logistic regression.

Results

Since 2016, first-attempt pass rates fluctuated between 20.3 % and 51.2 % with variability in performance observed across stations and class cohorts. Students with higher GPAs were more likely to pass all stations on the first attempt. Although history of a course deficiency did not affect overall pass rates, it was associated with lower odds of passing the interviewing and order verification stations.

Conclusions

A Capstone Exam model fulfills the requirements in ACPE Standard 25.8 using a sustainable approach and has supported curricular continuous quality improvement. Findings regarding predictive value of GPA and prior course deficiencies may enable identifying students who would benefit from additional preparation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为高级药学实践经验领域评估的顶点考试的发展。
简介:药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)标准要求药学学校评估高级药学实践经验(APPE)的准备情况。本文描述了一个顶点考试的开发和实施,用于评估ap准备情况,并探索学生在考试中的表现与教学课程中的表现指标之间的潜在相关性。方法:教师根据ACPE标准附录a中的Pre-APPE领域开发了一个顶点考试,包括五个评估技能的站点,包括:面试、咨询、处方检查、专业沟通和住院医嘱验证。在第三个专业年度的春季学期,学生必须通过所有的课程才能升读应用程序专业课程。使用逻辑回归探讨了2017-2023届学生群体的通过率与平均绩点(GPA)和课程缺课之间的关系。结果:自2016年以来,第一次尝试通过率在20.3%至51.2%之间波动,不同站点和班级队列的表现存在差异。gpa较高的学生更有可能在第一次考试中通过所有考点。虽然缺乏课程的历史并不影响总体通过率,但它与通过面试和订单验证站的几率较低有关。结论:顶点考试模式使用可持续的方法满足ACPE标准25.8的要求,并支持课程的持续质量改进。关于GPA的预测价值和先前课程不足的发现可以帮助确定哪些学生将受益于额外的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
First professional year student Pharmacists' approaches to resolving drug diversion incidents in a community pharmacy simulation Pharmacy faculty perspectives about implementing competency-based education in pharmacy education Embedding pharmacy practice, veterinary pharmacy, and environmental pharmacy to implement ‘One Health’ in pharmacy education Addressing systemic racism and its influence on health disparities through a foundational pharmacy course and a student-led symposium Apply the 4 lenses to the self-study process to identify blind spots and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1