Impact of Hearing Loss Type on Linguistic Development in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology Research Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.3390/audiolres14060084
Nadia Porcar-Gozalbo, Miguel López-Zamora, Beatriz Valles-González, Alejandro Cano-Villagrasa
{"title":"Impact of Hearing Loss Type on Linguistic Development in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Nadia Porcar-Gozalbo, Miguel López-Zamora, Beatriz Valles-González, Alejandro Cano-Villagrasa","doi":"10.3390/audiolres14060084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hearing loss in childhood is associated with significant challenges in linguistic and cognitive development, particularly affecting language skills such as syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, which are essential for effective communication and social integration. This study aimed to analyze how different types and degrees of hearing loss impact linguistic development in children, and to identify clinical factors-such as age at diagnosis and years of language intervention-that may predict language performance. <b>Methods:</b> This study included a sample of 140 children aged 6 to 12, categorized into seven groups based on their hearing condition: unilateral and bilateral conductive, unilateral and bilateral sensorineural, unilateral and bilateral mixed hearing loss, and a control group with no hearing loss. Linguistic development was assessed using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5), a validated tool for diagnosing language disorders. Statistical analyses, including MANOVA and multiple regression, were conducted to evaluate differences in linguistic skills across groups and to determine the predictive value of clinical variables on total language performance. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed statistically significant differences across groups in all assessed linguistic domains (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with children with severe or bilateral hearing loss exhibiting notably lower scores compared to normohearing peers. The multiple regression analysis indicated that type of hearing loss was the strongest predictor of total linguistic performance (β = -0.674), followed by age at diagnosis (β = -0.285) and age of hearing device adaptation (β = -0.220). Years of language intervention also contributed significantly (β = 0.198) but to a lesser extent. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the critical impact of early and comprehensive auditory and language intervention on linguistic outcomes for children with hearing impairments. Early diagnosis and timely adaptation of hearing aids or cochlear implants are essential in mitigating language deficits, particularly in areas like syntax and pragmatic skills. These findings support the need for specialized, long-term interventions tailored to the severity and type of hearing loss to improve language development in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"14 6","pages":"1014-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14060084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss in childhood is associated with significant challenges in linguistic and cognitive development, particularly affecting language skills such as syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, which are essential for effective communication and social integration. This study aimed to analyze how different types and degrees of hearing loss impact linguistic development in children, and to identify clinical factors-such as age at diagnosis and years of language intervention-that may predict language performance. Methods: This study included a sample of 140 children aged 6 to 12, categorized into seven groups based on their hearing condition: unilateral and bilateral conductive, unilateral and bilateral sensorineural, unilateral and bilateral mixed hearing loss, and a control group with no hearing loss. Linguistic development was assessed using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5), a validated tool for diagnosing language disorders. Statistical analyses, including MANOVA and multiple regression, were conducted to evaluate differences in linguistic skills across groups and to determine the predictive value of clinical variables on total language performance. Results: The analysis revealed statistically significant differences across groups in all assessed linguistic domains (p < 0.001), with children with severe or bilateral hearing loss exhibiting notably lower scores compared to normohearing peers. The multiple regression analysis indicated that type of hearing loss was the strongest predictor of total linguistic performance (β = -0.674), followed by age at diagnosis (β = -0.285) and age of hearing device adaptation (β = -0.220). Years of language intervention also contributed significantly (β = 0.198) but to a lesser extent. Conclusions: This study highlights the critical impact of early and comprehensive auditory and language intervention on linguistic outcomes for children with hearing impairments. Early diagnosis and timely adaptation of hearing aids or cochlear implants are essential in mitigating language deficits, particularly in areas like syntax and pragmatic skills. These findings support the need for specialized, long-term interventions tailored to the severity and type of hearing loss to improve language development in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力损失类型对儿童语言发展影响的横断面研究。
背景/目的:儿童时期的听力损失与语言和认知发展方面的重大挑战有关,特别是影响语言技能,如句法、语义和语用,这些对有效的沟通和社会融合至关重要。本研究旨在分析不同类型和程度的听力损失如何影响儿童的语言发展,并确定可能预测语言表现的临床因素,如诊断年龄和语言干预年数。方法:选取6 ~ 12岁儿童140例,根据听力情况分为单侧及双侧传导性听力损失组、单侧及双侧感音神经性听力损失组、单侧及双侧混合性听力损失组和无听力损失对照组。使用临床语言基础评估-5 (CELF-5)评估语言发展,CELF-5是诊断语言障碍的有效工具。统计分析,包括方差分析和多元回归,评估各组语言技能的差异,并确定临床变量对总语言表现的预测价值。结果:分析显示,在所有评估的语言领域中,各组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001),与听力正常的同龄人相比,重度或双侧听力损失的儿童得分明显较低。多元回归分析显示,听力损失类型是总语言表现的最强预测因子(β = -0.674),其次是诊断年龄(β = -0.285)和助听器适应年龄(β = -0.220)。语言干预年限也有显著影响(β = 0.198),但影响程度较小。结论:本研究强调了早期和全面的听觉和语言干预对听力障碍儿童语言结果的关键影响。早期诊断和及时适应助听器或人工耳蜗植入对于减轻语言缺陷至关重要,特别是在语法和语用技能等方面。这些发现支持需要针对听力损失的严重程度和类型进行专门的长期干预,以改善这一人群的语言发育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Across Multiple Hearing Domains. Can Hearing Aids Improve Physical Activity in Adults with Hearing Loss? A Feasibility Study. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Total Score: What Really Counts? Experience on a Sample of 1156 Patients. Visual Reliance in Severe Hearing Loss: Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) Study. Predictive Factors for Hearing Loss in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1