Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted surgery for pediatric patients weighing ≤ 10 kg with congenital biliary dilatation.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02181-5
Hiroki Ishii, Chiyoe Shirota, Takahisa Tainaka, Satoshi Makita, Miwa Satomi, Daiki Kato, Takuya Maeda, Kazuki Ota, Akinari Hinoki, Hiroo Uchida
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted surgery for pediatric patients weighing ≤ 10 kg with congenital biliary dilatation.","authors":"Hiroki Ishii, Chiyoe Shirota, Takahisa Tainaka, Satoshi Makita, Miwa Satomi, Daiki Kato, Takuya Maeda, Kazuki Ota, Akinari Hinoki, Hiroo Uchida","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02181-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advantage of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is its ability to perform fine surgical operations with higher-resolution images. RAS should be particularly beneficial for small children, but it requires a certain amount of working space. The da Vinci Surgical System instructions state that careful consideration of indications for robotic surgery in patients weighing ≤ 10 kg is required. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of RAS in pediatric patients weighing ≤ 10 kg with congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). Pediatric patients who underwent surgery for CBD at our institution were included. Patients were divided into three groups: the ≤ 10 kg group (RS-S) and the > 10 kg group (RS-L), both of which underwent robotic surgery, and another ≤ 10 kg group (LS-S), which underwent laparoscopic surgery. No patient required conversion to laparotomy. The operative duration was significantly shorter in the RS-S group than in the RS-L group. Intraoperative bleeding and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the RS-S and RS-L groups. Postoperative drain removal and hospital stay were shorter in the RS-S group than in the LS-S group. Our findings suggest that RAS can be safely and precisely implemented for infants weighing ≤ 10 kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02181-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advantage of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is its ability to perform fine surgical operations with higher-resolution images. RAS should be particularly beneficial for small children, but it requires a certain amount of working space. The da Vinci Surgical System instructions state that careful consideration of indications for robotic surgery in patients weighing ≤ 10 kg is required. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of RAS in pediatric patients weighing ≤ 10 kg with congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). Pediatric patients who underwent surgery for CBD at our institution were included. Patients were divided into three groups: the ≤ 10 kg group (RS-S) and the > 10 kg group (RS-L), both of which underwent robotic surgery, and another ≤ 10 kg group (LS-S), which underwent laparoscopic surgery. No patient required conversion to laparotomy. The operative duration was significantly shorter in the RS-S group than in the RS-L group. Intraoperative bleeding and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the RS-S and RS-L groups. Postoperative drain removal and hospital stay were shorter in the RS-S group than in the LS-S group. Our findings suggest that RAS can be safely and precisely implemented for infants weighing ≤ 10 kg.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重≤10kg先天性胆道扩张患儿机器人辅助手术的安全性和可行性
机器人辅助手术(RAS)的优势在于它能够用更高分辨率的图像进行精细的外科手术。RAS应该对小孩特别有益,但它需要一定的工作空间。达芬奇手术系统说明书指出,对于体重≤10公斤的患者,需要仔细考虑机器人手术的适应症。我们的目的是研究RAS在体重≤10 kg的先天性胆道扩张(CBD)患儿中的安全性和有效性。在我们机构接受CBD手术的儿科患者被纳入研究。患者分为三组:≤10 kg组(RS-S)和> 10 kg组(RS-L),均采用机器人手术,另一组≤10 kg组(LS-S)采用腹腔镜手术。没有病人需要转为剖腹手术。RS-S组的手术时间明显短于RS-L组。RS-S组和RS-L组术中出血和住院时间无显著差异。RS-S组术后引流及住院时间均短于LS-S组。我们的研究结果表明,对于体重≤10 kg的婴儿,RAS可以安全、精确地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Huscher modified technique for robotic pancreaticojejunostomy: a video report. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the da Vinci, hinotori, and Hugo robot-assisted surgery systems. Democratization in abdominal ablation therapies: The impact of percutaneous robotic assistance on accuracy-A systematic review. Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Improved positioning in robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the EDGE MP1000 surgical robot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1