Anxiety about artificial intelligence from patient and doctor-physician.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108619
Wenyu Li, Xueen Liu
{"title":"Anxiety about artificial intelligence from patient and doctor-physician.","authors":"Wenyu Li, Xueen Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper investigates the anxiety surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in doctor-patient interactions, analyzing the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers to identify key concerns and potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employs a comprehensive literature review, examining existing research on AI in healthcare, and synthesizes findings from various surveys and studies that explore the attitudes of patients and doctors towards AI applications in medical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis reveals that patient anxiety encompasses algorithm aversion, robophobia, lack of humanistic care, challenges in human-machine interaction, and concerns about AI's universal applicability. Doctors' anxieties stem from fears of replacement, legal liabilities, emotional impacts of work environment changes, and technological apprehension. The paper highlights the need for patient participation, humanistic care, improved interaction methods, educational training, and policy guidelines to foster public understanding and trust in AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The paper concludes that addressing AI anxiety in doctor-patient relationships is crucial for successfully integrating AI in healthcare. It emphasizes the importance of respecting patient autonomy, addressing the lack of humanistic care, and improving patient-AI interaction to enhance the patient experience and reduce medical errors.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The study suggests that future research should focus on understanding the needs and concerns of patients and doctors, strengthening medical humanities education, and establishing policies to guide the ethical use of AI in medicine. It also recommends public education to enhance understanding and trust in AI to improve medical services and ensure professional development and stable work environment for doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"133 ","pages":"108619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This paper investigates the anxiety surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in doctor-patient interactions, analyzing the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers to identify key concerns and potential solutions.

Methods: The study employs a comprehensive literature review, examining existing research on AI in healthcare, and synthesizes findings from various surveys and studies that explore the attitudes of patients and doctors towards AI applications in medical settings.

Results: The analysis reveals that patient anxiety encompasses algorithm aversion, robophobia, lack of humanistic care, challenges in human-machine interaction, and concerns about AI's universal applicability. Doctors' anxieties stem from fears of replacement, legal liabilities, emotional impacts of work environment changes, and technological apprehension. The paper highlights the need for patient participation, humanistic care, improved interaction methods, educational training, and policy guidelines to foster public understanding and trust in AI.

Conclusion: The paper concludes that addressing AI anxiety in doctor-patient relationships is crucial for successfully integrating AI in healthcare. It emphasizes the importance of respecting patient autonomy, addressing the lack of humanistic care, and improving patient-AI interaction to enhance the patient experience and reduce medical errors.

Practice implications: The study suggests that future research should focus on understanding the needs and concerns of patients and doctors, strengthening medical humanities education, and establishing policies to guide the ethical use of AI in medicine. It also recommends public education to enhance understanding and trust in AI to improve medical services and ensure professional development and stable work environment for doctors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病人和医生对人工智能的焦虑。
目的:本文调查了围绕人工智能(AI)在医患互动中整合的焦虑,分析了患者和医疗保健提供者的观点,以确定关键问题和潜在的解决方案。方法:本研究采用了全面的文献综述,考察了人工智能在医疗保健领域的现有研究,并综合了各种调查和研究的结果,探讨了患者和医生对人工智能在医疗环境中应用的态度。结果:分析显示,患者焦虑主要包括算法厌恶、机器人恐惧症、人文关怀缺失、人机交互挑战以及对人工智能普遍适用性的担忧。医生的焦虑源于对替代的恐惧、法律责任、工作环境变化对情绪的影响以及对技术的担忧。本文强调了患者参与、人文关怀、改进互动方法、教育培训和政策指导的必要性,以促进公众对人工智能的理解和信任。结论:本文得出结论,解决医患关系中的人工智能焦虑对于成功将人工智能融入医疗保健至关重要。它强调尊重患者的自主权,解决人文关怀的缺失,改善患者与人工智能的互动,以增强患者体验,减少医疗差错。实践意义:研究建议未来的研究应侧重于了解患者和医生的需求和担忧,加强医学人文教育,并制定政策指导人工智能在医学中的道德使用。它还建议进行公众教育,以增强对人工智能的理解和信任,以改善医疗服务,确保医生的专业发展和稳定的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Embedding an illustrator in the process of co-producing resources to enhance communication and shared decision-making for patients prescribed high-risk medication. Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Effective remediation for advanced practice providers with lowest patient experience: The power of relational resources. Relative importance of "why" and "how" messages on medication behavior: Insights from construal level theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1