“The mannequins have been pink for a very long time.” Navigating whiteness and realness in simulation

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117647
David A. Ansari , Emily R. Via , Christine S. Park
{"title":"“The mannequins have been pink for a very long time.” Navigating whiteness and realness in simulation","authors":"David A. Ansari ,&nbsp;Emily R. Via ,&nbsp;Christine S. Park","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Simulation training provides health professions learners access to training not readily available to them and in a manner that does not harm patients. Simulation also supports learners to develop dispositions and professional communication and reflect on their biases. This study examines how learners, clinical education faculty, and simulation professionals reflect on diversity and antiracism in simulation and contextualize these reflections with their lived experience. We undertook interviews and focus group discussions with medical students, simulation professionals, and clinical education faculty (n = 47) at a public medical school in the U.S. Midwest with three campuses. Students, faculty, and simulation professionals recognized the importance of simulation as a safe and judgment free zone where they could build rapport with patients with a variety of health conditions and medical histories. Moreover, students recognized how simulation professionals created environments where they could ask questions, practice techniques, and feel more prepared for their future clinical encounters. Students, faculty, and simulation professionals recognized how cases written by faculty, simulation professionals and equipment were insufficiently inclusive of the patient populations that students would eventually see, in terms of race, language, disability, body size, and age. Simulation reproduced biases and posed challenges to the perceived realness of encounters with simulated patients. Students who were visible minorities found it harder to relate to simulated patients and found these patients to be biased towards them. The ways faculty wrote cases and the inability to relate to standardized patients reinforced perceptions that the simulation did not feel real enough. While simulation has the potential to address the dimensions of medical training and practice that harm students and patients, it can also inadvertently reproduce these dimensions. We contend that these harmful products of simulation hinder the very efforts to create cultures of belonging and solidarity that antiracist practices in simulation seek to achieve.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117647"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation training provides health professions learners access to training not readily available to them and in a manner that does not harm patients. Simulation also supports learners to develop dispositions and professional communication and reflect on their biases. This study examines how learners, clinical education faculty, and simulation professionals reflect on diversity and antiracism in simulation and contextualize these reflections with their lived experience. We undertook interviews and focus group discussions with medical students, simulation professionals, and clinical education faculty (n = 47) at a public medical school in the U.S. Midwest with three campuses. Students, faculty, and simulation professionals recognized the importance of simulation as a safe and judgment free zone where they could build rapport with patients with a variety of health conditions and medical histories. Moreover, students recognized how simulation professionals created environments where they could ask questions, practice techniques, and feel more prepared for their future clinical encounters. Students, faculty, and simulation professionals recognized how cases written by faculty, simulation professionals and equipment were insufficiently inclusive of the patient populations that students would eventually see, in terms of race, language, disability, body size, and age. Simulation reproduced biases and posed challenges to the perceived realness of encounters with simulated patients. Students who were visible minorities found it harder to relate to simulated patients and found these patients to be biased towards them. The ways faculty wrote cases and the inability to relate to standardized patients reinforced perceptions that the simulation did not feel real enough. While simulation has the potential to address the dimensions of medical training and practice that harm students and patients, it can also inadvertently reproduce these dimensions. We contend that these harmful products of simulation hinder the very efforts to create cultures of belonging and solidarity that antiracist practices in simulation seek to achieve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“人体模型是粉红色的已经有很长时间了。”导航白色和真实模拟。
模拟培训以不伤害患者的方式为卫生专业学习者提供了他们无法获得的培训。模拟还支持学习者发展性格和专业沟通,并反思他们的偏见。本研究考察了学习者、临床教育教师和模拟专业人员如何反思模拟中的多样性和反种族主义,并将这些反思与他们的生活经验联系起来。我们在美国中西部有三个校区的一所公立医学院与医学生、模拟专业人员和临床教育教师(n = 47)进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论。学生、教师和模拟专业人员认识到模拟作为一个安全和自由判断的区域的重要性,在那里他们可以与各种健康状况和病史的患者建立融洽的关系。此外,学生们认识到模拟专业人员如何创造环境,让他们可以提出问题,练习技术,并为未来的临床接触做好准备。学生、教师和模拟专业人员认识到,教师、模拟专业人员和设备编写的病例不足以涵盖学生最终看到的患者群体,包括种族、语言、残疾、体型和年龄。模拟再现了偏见,并对与模拟患者接触的感知真实性提出了挑战。少数族裔学生发现更难与模拟病人建立联系,并发现这些病人对他们有偏见。教师撰写病例的方式以及无法与标准化患者建立联系,强化了人们的看法,即模拟的感觉不够真实。虽然模拟有可能解决医疗培训和实践中伤害学生和患者的问题,但它也可能无意中再现这些问题。我们认为,这些模拟的有害产物阻碍了创造归属感和团结文化的努力,而这正是模拟中的反种族主义做法所寻求实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Relatively independent and complementary roles of family history and polygenic risk score in age at onset and incident cases of 12 common diseases Changes in marital and health status as risk factors for a subsequent negative wealth shock: A population-based longitudinal study in the United States, 1995–2020 Testing “the science”: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 testing policy across four Canadian provinces Using spatial Bayesian models to estimate associations between structural racial discrimination and disparities in severe maternal morbidity Exploring the drivers of unsustainable pressures in health and social care: A qualitative system dynamics approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1