Behaviours and drivers of diagnosis-related group upcoding in China: A mixed-methods study.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117660
Wuping Zhou, Chunchun Xu, Lanyue Zhang, Hongqiao Fu, Weiyan Jian
{"title":"Behaviours and drivers of diagnosis-related group upcoding in China: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Wuping Zhou, Chunchun Xu, Lanyue Zhang, Hongqiao Fu, Weiyan Jian","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a highly destructive gaming behaviour in Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG), upcoding has garnered increasing scholarly attention. This study considers the prevalence, types and risk characteristics of upcoding during the pilot implementation of DRG payments in China, and it also explores the drivers of upcoding and provides corresponding policy recommendations for improving the system. Quantitative research data were sourced from the DRG payment audit database in City Z between the dates of June 1, 2019 and May 31, 2020, encompassing audit results comprising 200 medical records randomly selected from 28 hospitals. Qualitative research methods were used, including semi-structured interviews conducted with 10 stakeholders with interests in the DRG payment system, and thematic framework of the consequent data. 5,157 (92.01%) valid records were re-abstracted. 666 (12.91%) evaluated records were found to be upcoded, resulting in an additional payment at a rate of 45.27%. Several factors emerged as shedding light on the probability of upcoding, including cases with comorbidities, those undergoing non-operating room procedures and internal medical treatments, cases in for-profit hospitals and cases in tertiary hospitals. The main drivers of upcoding were found to be financial and administrative pressures, dysfunctional attitudes towards upcoding, technical facilitation and lack of supervision. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the behaviours and drivers of DRG upcoding in China, considering the unique hospital management system and incentive mechanisms in place. The results demonstrate that, following the initiation of the DRG payment system, providers have begun to engage in upcoding behaviour under various drivers, leading to additional health care expenditures and undermining the effectiveness of the scheme. In terms of mounting a response to this behaviour, understanding it and what drives it can aid in its prevention. This study suggests implementing intelligent audits to strengthen supervision and supporting hospitals in cost management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"117660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a highly destructive gaming behaviour in Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG), upcoding has garnered increasing scholarly attention. This study considers the prevalence, types and risk characteristics of upcoding during the pilot implementation of DRG payments in China, and it also explores the drivers of upcoding and provides corresponding policy recommendations for improving the system. Quantitative research data were sourced from the DRG payment audit database in City Z between the dates of June 1, 2019 and May 31, 2020, encompassing audit results comprising 200 medical records randomly selected from 28 hospitals. Qualitative research methods were used, including semi-structured interviews conducted with 10 stakeholders with interests in the DRG payment system, and thematic framework of the consequent data. 5,157 (92.01%) valid records were re-abstracted. 666 (12.91%) evaluated records were found to be upcoded, resulting in an additional payment at a rate of 45.27%. Several factors emerged as shedding light on the probability of upcoding, including cases with comorbidities, those undergoing non-operating room procedures and internal medical treatments, cases in for-profit hospitals and cases in tertiary hospitals. The main drivers of upcoding were found to be financial and administrative pressures, dysfunctional attitudes towards upcoding, technical facilitation and lack of supervision. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the behaviours and drivers of DRG upcoding in China, considering the unique hospital management system and incentive mechanisms in place. The results demonstrate that, following the initiation of the DRG payment system, providers have begun to engage in upcoding behaviour under various drivers, leading to additional health care expenditures and undermining the effectiveness of the scheme. In terms of mounting a response to this behaviour, understanding it and what drives it can aid in its prevention. This study suggests implementing intelligent audits to strengthen supervision and supporting hospitals in cost management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Surviving the 2021 heat dome with schizophrenia: A qualitative, interview-based unpacking of risks and vulnerabilities. Transition symptom management careers: Historical patterns of mental health symptoms and service use among young adults experiencing a psychiatric crisis. Nurses' perspectives on assisted suicide: Challenges and support needs. Behaviours and drivers of diagnosis-related group upcoding in China: A mixed-methods study. Disparities in quality of life by race, gender, and sexual orientation: An intersectional analysis of population-representative data in Gauteng, South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1