Volition as a modulator of the intergroup empathy bias.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2024.2446816
Emilie A Caspar, Eva Nicolay, Félix Banderembaho, Guillaume P Pech
{"title":"Volition as a modulator of the intergroup empathy bias.","authors":"Emilie A Caspar, Eva Nicolay, Félix Banderembaho, Guillaume P Pech","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2024.2446816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neural reactions to others' pain are usually lower when the individual is of a different ethnicity than when they are of the same ethnicity. This suggests that empathy is not only an automatic phenomenon but also a motivated one. In the present study, we tested whether one's willingness to increase or decrease empathy would correspondingly increase or decrease the neural empathic response, as measured with electroencephalography (EEG), irrespective of ethnicity. In Study 1, participants were presented with pictures displaying painful or non-painful stimulations on an individual from a similar or different ethnic group. In Study 2, the procedure was relatively similar but employed a within-subject design and was conducted in two countries: Belgium and Rwanda. Overall, EEG results showed that participants successfully increased their neural response to the pain of others, irrespective of the others' ethnicity in Study 1. However, the within-subject design used in Study 2 revealed additional nuances, as we observed that participants increased their neural pain response selectively toward ingroup individuals. Our findings indicate that observing the pain of a single person, regardless of ethnicity, can heighten one's neural reaction. Yet, when both ingroup and outgroup members are present, the neural response intensifies only for ingroup members.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"326-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2024.2446816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neural reactions to others' pain are usually lower when the individual is of a different ethnicity than when they are of the same ethnicity. This suggests that empathy is not only an automatic phenomenon but also a motivated one. In the present study, we tested whether one's willingness to increase or decrease empathy would correspondingly increase or decrease the neural empathic response, as measured with electroencephalography (EEG), irrespective of ethnicity. In Study 1, participants were presented with pictures displaying painful or non-painful stimulations on an individual from a similar or different ethnic group. In Study 2, the procedure was relatively similar but employed a within-subject design and was conducted in two countries: Belgium and Rwanda. Overall, EEG results showed that participants successfully increased their neural response to the pain of others, irrespective of the others' ethnicity in Study 1. However, the within-subject design used in Study 2 revealed additional nuances, as we observed that participants increased their neural pain response selectively toward ingroup individuals. Our findings indicate that observing the pain of a single person, regardless of ethnicity, can heighten one's neural reaction. Yet, when both ingroup and outgroup members are present, the neural response intensifies only for ingroup members.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意愿对群体间共情偏见的调节作用。
不同种族的人对他人痛苦的神经反应通常比同一种族的人要低。这表明移情不仅是一种自动现象,也是一种动机性现象。在本研究中,我们测试了一个人增加或减少共情的意愿是否会相应地增加或减少神经共情反应,正如脑电图(EEG)所测量的那样,与种族无关。在研究1中,研究人员向参与者展示了来自相似或不同种族群体的个体遭受痛苦或非痛苦刺激的图片。在研究2中,程序相对相似,但采用了受试者内设计,并在两个国家进行:比利时和卢旺达。总的来说,脑电图结果显示,在研究1中,参与者成功地增强了他们对他人疼痛的神经反应,而与他人的种族无关。然而,研究2中使用的受试者内设计揭示了额外的细微差别,因为我们观察到参与者选择性地增加了对群体内个体的神经疼痛反应。我们的研究结果表明,观察一个人的疼痛,无论种族,都可以增强一个人的神经反应。然而,当群内成员和群外成员都在场时,神经反应只对群内成员加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
期刊最新文献
Social group size alters social behavior and dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. How does teaching experience impact brain processes underlying the theory of mind? Study on primary school educators. Embodied hyperscanning for studying social interaction: A scoping review of simultaneous brain and body measurements. Social and perceptual decisions predict differences in face inversion neural correlates: Implications for development and face perception methods. Exploring how first- and third-person narrative modulates neural activation during a social cognition task. An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1