Shortened NIHSS for Rapid Stroke Assessment in Emergency Care Settings.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologist Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000608
Sama Rahnemayan, Alireza Ala, Nasrin Taghizadeh, Elyar Sadeghi-Hokmabadi, Ipak Entezari, Samad Shamsvahdati
{"title":"Shortened NIHSS for Rapid Stroke Assessment in Emergency Care Settings.","authors":"Sama Rahnemayan, Alireza Ala, Nasrin Taghizadeh, Elyar Sadeghi-Hokmabadi, Ipak Entezari, Samad Shamsvahdati","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used to assess ischemic stroke severity, but its full 11-item version can be time-consuming. This study evaluates the NIHSS-8, a shortened version, for its efficacy compared with NIHSS-11 in an emergency department setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted from May 2018 to May 2019 at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Patients with suspected acute stroke were assessed using both NIHSS-11 and NIHSS-8. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate patient outcomes at discharge. Correlations between NIHSS-8, NIHSS-11, and mRS were analyzed, and diagnostic performance metrics were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 292 patients with a mean age of 70.40 years. Approximately 68.5% of patients were categorized as having moderate stroke severity using NIHSS-11, with a similar 67.1% using NIHSS-8. The correlation between NIHSS-11 and NIHSS-8 scores was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.970). Both scales showed strong relationships with mRS at discharge but were not significantly correlated with long-term outcomes. NIHSS-8 demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.9%, while NIHSS-11 showed 100% sensitivity and 96.9% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIHSS-8 is a reliable and efficient alternative to NIHSS-11 for assessing stroke severity in emergency departments. It provides high sensitivity and specificity while being less time-consuming, making it suitable for rapid stroke assessment and triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used to assess ischemic stroke severity, but its full 11-item version can be time-consuming. This study evaluates the NIHSS-8, a shortened version, for its efficacy compared with NIHSS-11 in an emergency department setting.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted from May 2018 to May 2019 at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Patients with suspected acute stroke were assessed using both NIHSS-11 and NIHSS-8. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate patient outcomes at discharge. Correlations between NIHSS-8, NIHSS-11, and mRS were analyzed, and diagnostic performance metrics were calculated.

Results: The study included 292 patients with a mean age of 70.40 years. Approximately 68.5% of patients were categorized as having moderate stroke severity using NIHSS-11, with a similar 67.1% using NIHSS-8. The correlation between NIHSS-11 and NIHSS-8 scores was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.970). Both scales showed strong relationships with mRS at discharge but were not significantly correlated with long-term outcomes. NIHSS-8 demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.9%, while NIHSS-11 showed 100% sensitivity and 96.9% specificity.

Conclusions: NIHSS-8 is a reliable and efficient alternative to NIHSS-11 for assessing stroke severity in emergency departments. It provides high sensitivity and specificity while being less time-consuming, making it suitable for rapid stroke assessment and triage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩短NIHSS快速卒中评估在紧急护理设置。
目的:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)被广泛用于评估缺血性卒中的严重程度,但其完整的11项版本可能很耗时。本研究评估了NIHSS-8(简称NIHSS-11)在急诊科的有效性。方法:2018年5月至2019年5月在伊朗大不里士伊玛目礼萨医院进行队列研究。采用NIHSS-11和NIHSS-8对疑似急性脑卒中患者进行评估。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估患者出院时的预后。分析NIHSS-8、NIHSS-11与mRS的相关性,并计算诊断性能指标。结果:纳入292例患者,平均年龄70.40岁。使用NIHSS-11,约68.5%的患者被归类为中度卒中严重程度,使用NIHSS-8,这一比例相似,为67.1%。NIHSS-11评分与NIHSS-8评分相关性较高(类内相关系数为0.970)。两种量表均与出院时的mRS有密切关系,但与长期预后无显著相关。NIHSS-8的敏感性为97.5%,特异性为96.9%;NIHSS-11的敏感性为100%,特异性为96.9%。结论:NIHSS-8是评估急诊科脑卒中严重程度的可靠和有效的替代NIHSS-11。它提供了高灵敏度和特异性,同时减少了时间,使其适合快速卒中评估和分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
期刊最新文献
Stroke-Related Factors Influencing Thrombolysis Eligibility and Outcomes. Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Virtual Assistant for Emergency Triage in Neurology. Syncope Induced by Dynamic Head and Shoulder Motion in the Setting of Left Subclavian Stenosis. A Mild Phenotype of Overlapping Syndrome With Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Immunoglobulin G: Mimicking Viral Meningitis in a Patient. Association of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index With Stroke and Mortality Rates: Evidence From the NHANES Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1