Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1
Tyra Fainstad, Carlos Rodriguez, Carlee Kreisel, Jennifer Caragol, Pari Shah Thibodeau, Marisa Kostiuk, Adrienne Mann
{"title":"Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Tyra Fainstad, Carlos Rodriguez, Carlee Kreisel, Jennifer Caragol, Pari Shah Thibodeau, Marisa Kostiuk, Adrienne Mann","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician burnout contributes to distress, turnover, and poor patient outcomes. Evidence suggests individual professional coaching may mitigate burnout but is costly and time intensive. Group coaching evidence is lacking. Here, we assess a group coaching program in ambulatory-based faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial occurred from February 1, 2023, to May 31, 2023, in 5 ambulatory and/or primary care-based departments at an academic institution. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (offered a 4-month, online, group coaching) or to a control group (not offered coaching). Surveys measuring validated dimensions of distress (burnout, impostor syndrome, moral injury, loneliness) and well-being (self-compassion, flourishing) were administered before and after the intervention. A linear mixed model analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 participants, the mean (SD) age was 42.0 (8.4), 131 (81.9%) identified as female, and 135 (85.4%) as White. Group coaching improved intervention participants' burnout domain of depersonalization (δ: -1.72 points [CI: -3.26, -0.17]; <i>P</i> = .03), impostor syndrome (δ: -0.82 points [95% CI: -1.47, -0.18, <i>P</i> = .01), and flourishing (0.35 points (95% CI: 0.03, 0.66), <i>P</i> = .03) compared with the control. There were no significant differences in the other domains of burnout, or moral injury, loneliness, or self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Four months of group-coaching improved some well-being outcomes in ambulatory-based clinicians. The intervention may be particularly useful given its accessibility, and online delivery supports greater scalability and lower cost than individual coaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group coaching is an institutionally provided, individually harnessed tool to heal physician burnout.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05635448.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician burnout contributes to distress, turnover, and poor patient outcomes. Evidence suggests individual professional coaching may mitigate burnout but is costly and time intensive. Group coaching evidence is lacking. Here, we assess a group coaching program in ambulatory-based faculty.

Methods: A randomized trial occurred from February 1, 2023, to May 31, 2023, in 5 ambulatory and/or primary care-based departments at an academic institution. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (offered a 4-month, online, group coaching) or to a control group (not offered coaching). Surveys measuring validated dimensions of distress (burnout, impostor syndrome, moral injury, loneliness) and well-being (self-compassion, flourishing) were administered before and after the intervention. A linear mixed model analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.

Results: Among 160 participants, the mean (SD) age was 42.0 (8.4), 131 (81.9%) identified as female, and 135 (85.4%) as White. Group coaching improved intervention participants' burnout domain of depersonalization (δ: -1.72 points [CI: -3.26, -0.17]; P = .03), impostor syndrome (δ: -0.82 points [95% CI: -1.47, -0.18, P = .01), and flourishing (0.35 points (95% CI: 0.03, 0.66), P = .03) compared with the control. There were no significant differences in the other domains of burnout, or moral injury, loneliness, or self-compassion.

Discussion: Four months of group-coaching improved some well-being outcomes in ambulatory-based clinicians. The intervention may be particularly useful given its accessibility, and online delivery supports greater scalability and lower cost than individual coaching.

Conclusion: Group coaching is an institutionally provided, individually harnessed tool to heal physician burnout.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05635448.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线小组辅导项目对门诊医师幸福感的影响:一项随机试验。
背景:医生职业倦怠会导致痛苦、离职和患者预后差。有证据表明,个人专业指导可能会减轻职业倦怠,但这是昂贵和耗时的。缺乏团体指导的证据。在这里,我们评估了一个以流动教师为基础的小组辅导计划。方法:一项随机试验于2023年2月1日至2023年5月31日在一家学术机构的5个门诊和/或初级保健部门进行。参与者被随机分配到干预组(提供4个月的在线小组指导)或对照组(不提供指导)。在干预前后分别进行了调查,测量了痛苦(倦怠、骗子综合症、道德伤害、孤独)和幸福(自我同情、繁荣)的有效维度。在意向治疗基础上进行线性混合模型分析。结果:160名参与者的平均(SD)年龄为42.0岁(8.4%),131名(81.9%)为女性,135名(85.4%)为白人。团体辅导改善了干预者去人格化倦怠域(δ: -1.72分[CI: -3.26, -0.17];P = .03),冒名顶替综合症(δ: -0.82点[95% CI: -1.47, -0.18, P = .01),繁荣(0.35点(95% CI: 0.03, 0.66), P = .03)。在倦怠、道德伤害、孤独或自我同情等其他领域没有显著差异。讨论:四个月的小组辅导改善了门诊临床医生的一些健康状况。考虑到干预的可访问性,它可能特别有用,并且在线交付比个人指导支持更大的可伸缩性和更低的成本。结论:团体辅导是一种制度性的、个性化的治疗医师职业倦怠的工具。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05635448。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Care Coordination: How Is It Implemented and Is It Different If a Social Worker Is on the Team? Examining the Construct Stability of the Family Medicine Certification Scale Between One-Day Exam and Longitudinal Assessment. Strategies for Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health into Health Centers. The Minority Tax: Stories from Family Physicians. The One Taboo Question.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1