Preventing Spinal Cord Injury in Single-Staged Juxtarenal and Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: An Evaluation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Catheter Drainage.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1177/15266028241309252
Corinna Walter, Kornelia Hirsch, Sabine Heil, Fadi Taher, Jürgen Falkensammer, Burkhard Gustorff, Afshin Assadian
{"title":"Preventing Spinal Cord Injury in Single-Staged Juxtarenal and Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: An Evaluation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Catheter Drainage.","authors":"Corinna Walter, Kornelia Hirsch, Sabine Heil, Fadi Taher, Jürgen Falkensammer, Burkhard Gustorff, Afshin Assadian","doi":"10.1177/15266028241309252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study offers a retrospective assessment of a single-center experience using cerebrospinal fluid catheters to reduce the risk of perioperative spinal cord injury in patients undergoing single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 patients were included. On average, 70.7%±14.4% of the aortic segment between the left subclavian artery and the aortic bifurcation was covered during the procedures. Of the 53 patients receiving cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 77.4% were prophylactic and 22.6% were in symptomatic patients. The overall spinal cord injury rate was 12.4%, with 8.3% experiencing transient spinal cord injury with immediate improvement after cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and 4.1% of patients suffering permanent spinal cord injury: 2 (2.1%) with minor deficits and 2 (2.1%) with paraplegia. The mean intraoperatively administered heparin dosage was 7500 international units, and an additional intravenous bolus of acetylsalicylic acid was given in 69 cases (71.1%), whereas the cerebrospinal fluid drain was in situ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation of the employed in-house protocol for single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, focusing on cerebrospinal fluid catheter management in conjunction with necessary anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication, indicated that the use of a cerebrospinal fluid catheter is a feasible approach for spinal cord injury risk reduction in selected high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) in reducing spinal cord injury (SCI) rates from 12.4% to 4.1% during single-staged complex endovascular repair of juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Implementing CSFD within a standardized protocol achieved a 99.7% target visceral and renal vessel patency without major CSFD-related bleeding complications. These findings emphasize CSFD as a feasible and effective tool for SCI prevention in selected high-risk patients. While supporting on-demand catheter placement, this study underscores the potential of selective prophylactic CSFD use, contributing to safer, evidence-based strategies in managing high-risk aortic repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241309252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241309252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study offers a retrospective assessment of a single-center experience using cerebrospinal fluid catheters to reduce the risk of perioperative spinal cord injury in patients undergoing single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Results: A total of 97 patients were included. On average, 70.7%±14.4% of the aortic segment between the left subclavian artery and the aortic bifurcation was covered during the procedures. Of the 53 patients receiving cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 77.4% were prophylactic and 22.6% were in symptomatic patients. The overall spinal cord injury rate was 12.4%, with 8.3% experiencing transient spinal cord injury with immediate improvement after cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and 4.1% of patients suffering permanent spinal cord injury: 2 (2.1%) with minor deficits and 2 (2.1%) with paraplegia. The mean intraoperatively administered heparin dosage was 7500 international units, and an additional intravenous bolus of acetylsalicylic acid was given in 69 cases (71.1%), whereas the cerebrospinal fluid drain was in situ.

Conclusions: The evaluation of the employed in-house protocol for single-staged complex endovascular juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, focusing on cerebrospinal fluid catheter management in conjunction with necessary anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication, indicated that the use of a cerebrospinal fluid catheter is a feasible approach for spinal cord injury risk reduction in selected high-risk patients.

Clinical impact: This study highlights the effectiveness of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) in reducing spinal cord injury (SCI) rates from 12.4% to 4.1% during single-staged complex endovascular repair of juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Implementing CSFD within a standardized protocol achieved a 99.7% target visceral and renal vessel patency without major CSFD-related bleeding complications. These findings emphasize CSFD as a feasible and effective tool for SCI prevention in selected high-risk patients. While supporting on-demand catheter placement, this study underscores the potential of selective prophylactic CSFD use, contributing to safer, evidence-based strategies in managing high-risk aortic repairs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防单期椎旁和胸腹腔内主动脉瘤修复术中脊髓损伤:脑脊液导管引流的评价。
目的:本研究回顾性评估单中心使用脑脊液导管降低单阶段复杂血管内肾旁或胸腹主动脉瘤修复术患者围手术期脊髓损伤的风险。结果:共纳入97例患者。平均70.7%±14.4%的左锁骨下动脉与主动脉分叉之间的主动脉段在手术过程中被覆盖。53例接受脑脊液引流的患者中,预防者占77.4%,有症状者占22.6%。总体脊髓损伤率为12.4%,其中8.3%为短暂性脊髓损伤,脑脊液引流后立即好转,4.1%为永久性脊髓损伤:2例(2.1%)轻度缺损,2例(2.1%)截瘫。术中给予肝素的平均剂量为7500国际单位,另有69例(71.1%)患者静脉注射乙酰水杨酸,脑脊液原位引流。结论:对采用的单阶段复杂血管内膝旁和胸腹主动脉瘤修复方案的评估,重点是脑脊液导管管理,并结合必要的抗凝和抗血小板药物,表明在选定的高危患者中,使用脑脊液导管是降低脊髓损伤风险的可行方法。临床影响:本研究强调了脑脊液引流(CSFD)在单阶段复杂血管内修复肾旁和胸腹主动脉瘤时将脊髓损伤(SCI)发生率从12.4%降低到4.1%的有效性。在标准化方案中实施CSFD实现了99.7%的内脏和肾脏血管通畅目标,没有发生与CSFD相关的主要出血并发症。这些发现强调了CSFD是预防高危患者脊髓损伤的可行和有效的工具。在支持按需放置导管的同时,本研究强调了选择性预防性使用CSFD的潜力,为管理高风险主动脉修复提供了更安全、循证的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks. Long-Term Follow-up of Subjects With Iliac Occlusive Disease Treated With the Viabahn VBX Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1