Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for cT3N0M0 Glottic SCC: Outcomes in Candidates for Total Laryngectomy Responding Well to Induction Chemotherapy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1177/00034894241308797
Ollivier Laccourreye, Michaele Francesco Corbisiero, Dominique Garcia, Haitham Mirghani, Philippe Giraud
{"title":"Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for cT3N0M0 Glottic SCC: Outcomes in Candidates for Total Laryngectomy Responding Well to Induction Chemotherapy.","authors":"Ollivier Laccourreye, Michaele Francesco Corbisiero, Dominique Garcia, Haitham Mirghani, Philippe Giraud","doi":"10.1177/00034894241308797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) may be a viable alternative to radiation therapy (RT) for patients with glottic cT3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who are surgical candidates for total laryngectomy (TL) and respond well to platinum-based induction chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series review of 18 consecutive patients with cT3N0M0 glottic SCC, initially considered surgical candidates only for TL who showed a good response to platinum-based induction chemotherapy, managed at a French university teaching institution with either SCPL (n = 9) or RT (n = 9). The main endpoints were 10-year local control and laryngeal preservation. The secondary endpoints were 10-year survival, causes of death analysis, and univariate analysis of local control and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-year actuarial local control, laryngeal preservation, survival rates were 77.8%, 88.9%, and 66.7% after SCPL, respectively, and 72.9%, 87.5%, and 33.3%, after RT without significant statistical differences. In univariate analysis none of the clinical variables under analysis were related to local control and survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that SCPL may warrant further consideration as a treatment option for glottic cT3N0M0 SCC patients who respond well to platinum-based induction chemotherapy. However, additional prospective research is warranted given the retrospective, nonrandomized nature of the presented case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894241308797"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241308797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) may be a viable alternative to radiation therapy (RT) for patients with glottic cT3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who are surgical candidates for total laryngectomy (TL) and respond well to platinum-based induction chemotherapy.

Methods: Retrospective case series review of 18 consecutive patients with cT3N0M0 glottic SCC, initially considered surgical candidates only for TL who showed a good response to platinum-based induction chemotherapy, managed at a French university teaching institution with either SCPL (n = 9) or RT (n = 9). The main endpoints were 10-year local control and laryngeal preservation. The secondary endpoints were 10-year survival, causes of death analysis, and univariate analysis of local control and survival.

Results: The 10-year actuarial local control, laryngeal preservation, survival rates were 77.8%, 88.9%, and 66.7% after SCPL, respectively, and 72.9%, 87.5%, and 33.3%, after RT without significant statistical differences. In univariate analysis none of the clinical variables under analysis were related to local control and survival.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that SCPL may warrant further consideration as a treatment option for glottic cT3N0M0 SCC patients who respond well to platinum-based induction chemotherapy. However, additional prospective research is warranted given the retrospective, nonrandomized nature of the presented case series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Newborn Hearing: A Systematic Review. Gathering Validity Evidence for a Simulation-Based Test of Otoscopy Skills. Radiographic Variants Associated With Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Key Differences for Pre-Operative Planning. The Effect of Obesity on Postoperative Analgesia Practices and Complications Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Assessing the Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1