Symmetries of the vertical ground reaction force, contact time and area, and center of pressure during gait in female patients 3 weeks post-total hip arthroplasty
{"title":"Symmetries of the vertical ground reaction force, contact time and area, and center of pressure during gait in female patients 3 weeks post-total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Namika Miura, Kensaku Masuhara, Keiichi Tagomori, Hisashi Ikutomo, Kenichi Okamura, Takato Okuno, Nanase Sakaguchi, Norikazu Nakagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few studies have assessed vertical ground reaction force, contact time, contact area, and center of pressure during gait in the early phase post-total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to investigate whether these parameters are more pronounced in participants post-total hip arthroplasty compared to healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 22 female participants who underwent total hip arthroplasty (age, 68.9 ± 7.2 years; body mass index, 22.9 ± 2.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and 11 healthy female controls (age, 50.3 ± 7.8 years; body mass index, 19.4 ± 1.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) as controls. Vertical ground reaction force, contact time, contact area, and center of pressure during gait were measured using a force plate. Comparisons between the affected, unaffected, and control legs were conducted using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test, with additional comparisons using independent <em>t</em>-tests or the Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The first peak force was lower, the time to the first peak force and heel contact time were longer, and the contact area at the second peak force was significantly larger in the affected leg than in the unaffected leg or the right leg of the controls. These parameters were significantly more asymmetrical in the total hip arthroplasty cohort compared to the controls, with significant differences in the starting position and center of pressure length.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The loading timing, magnitude, and form of plantar contact during gait were more asymmetrical in the total hip arthroplasty cohort than in healthy females. Early-phase rehabilitation post-total hip arthroplasty should address these asymmetries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324002511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Few studies have assessed vertical ground reaction force, contact time, contact area, and center of pressure during gait in the early phase post-total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to investigate whether these parameters are more pronounced in participants post-total hip arthroplasty compared to healthy controls.
Methods
We included 22 female participants who underwent total hip arthroplasty (age, 68.9 ± 7.2 years; body mass index, 22.9 ± 2.6 kg/m2) and 11 healthy female controls (age, 50.3 ± 7.8 years; body mass index, 19.4 ± 1.7 kg/m2) as controls. Vertical ground reaction force, contact time, contact area, and center of pressure during gait were measured using a force plate. Comparisons between the affected, unaffected, and control legs were conducted using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test, with additional comparisons using independent t-tests or the Mann–Whitney U test.
Findings
The first peak force was lower, the time to the first peak force and heel contact time were longer, and the contact area at the second peak force was significantly larger in the affected leg than in the unaffected leg or the right leg of the controls. These parameters were significantly more asymmetrical in the total hip arthroplasty cohort compared to the controls, with significant differences in the starting position and center of pressure length.
Interpretation
The loading timing, magnitude, and form of plantar contact during gait were more asymmetrical in the total hip arthroplasty cohort than in healthy females. Early-phase rehabilitation post-total hip arthroplasty should address these asymmetries.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.