Huddles in Hospital Maternity Settings: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000001077
Samantha L Bernstein, Jessica G Bell, Rebecca Broadhurst
{"title":"Huddles in Hospital Maternity Settings: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Samantha L Bernstein, Jessica G Bell, Rebecca Broadhurst","doi":"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommends the use of safety huddles, in which clinicians are briefly gathered to review a patient's condition, including new or developing changes in acuity or stability. The Joint Commission describes huddles as a \"hallmark\" of high-reliability organizations. Previous reviews have confirmed the general utility of huddles, including positive regard by clinicians, but there has not been work specifically looking at huddle use in hospital maternity care settings. Our objective was to identify the ways that huddles have been studied or reported in inpatient maternity settings and synthesize this information with recommendations from professional organizations to identify gaps in the literature published in the United States since 1999.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework to guide our scoping review. Using the time frame from 1999 to 2024, we searched the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, as well as gray literature and the reference lists and citing articles of the included manuscripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 160 documents, of which 47 met inclusion criteria, including 11 care bundles, 10 quality improvement projects, and 4 research studies. The remaining 22 were a variety of editorials, position papers, and other gray literature.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is scant research on the use of huddles in hospital maternity care settings, and most literature does not define the participants, timing, or agenda of the huddle. Further research is needed to understand how huddles affect outcomes in maternity settings. Researchers should explicitly define the huddles they are studying. The review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework Registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51121,"journal":{"name":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommends the use of safety huddles, in which clinicians are briefly gathered to review a patient's condition, including new or developing changes in acuity or stability. The Joint Commission describes huddles as a "hallmark" of high-reliability organizations. Previous reviews have confirmed the general utility of huddles, including positive regard by clinicians, but there has not been work specifically looking at huddle use in hospital maternity care settings. Our objective was to identify the ways that huddles have been studied or reported in inpatient maternity settings and synthesize this information with recommendations from professional organizations to identify gaps in the literature published in the United States since 1999.

Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework to guide our scoping review. Using the time frame from 1999 to 2024, we searched the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, as well as gray literature and the reference lists and citing articles of the included manuscripts.

Results: We found 160 documents, of which 47 met inclusion criteria, including 11 care bundles, 10 quality improvement projects, and 4 research studies. The remaining 22 were a variety of editorials, position papers, and other gray literature.

Discussion: There is scant research on the use of huddles in hospital maternity care settings, and most literature does not define the participants, timing, or agenda of the huddle. Further research is needed to understand how huddles affect outcomes in maternity settings. Researchers should explicitly define the huddles they are studying. The review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework Registries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MCN''s mission is to provide the most timely, relevant information to nurses practicing in perinatal, neonatal, midwifery, and pediatric specialties. MCN is a peer-reviewed journal that meets its mission by publishing clinically relevant practice and research manuscripts aimed at assisting nurses toward evidence-based practice. MCN focuses on today''s major issues and high priority problems in maternal/child nursing, women''s health, and family nursing with extensive coverage of advanced practice healthcare issues relating to infants and young children. Each issue features peer-reviewed, clinically relevant articles. Coverage includes updates on disease and related care; ideas on health promotion; insights into patient and family behavior; discoveries in physiology and pathophysiology; clinical investigations; and research manuscripts that assist nurses toward evidence-based practices.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Rural Access to Prenatal Care in the United States by Patients, Nurses, Midwives, and Physicians: An Integrative Review. Maternal Nutrition and Human Milk Nutrients: A Scoping Review. Reviewer List 2024. Toward Evidence-Based Practice. mHealth for Women with Pregnancies with Fetal Anomalies: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1