GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12120125
Florent Vinchon, Valentin Gironnay, Todd Lubart
{"title":"GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity.","authors":"Florent Vinchon, Valentin Gironnay, Todd Lubart","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12120125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined generative artificial intelligences (GenAIs), as popularized by ChatGPT, in standardized creativity tests. Benchmarking GenAI against human performance, the results showed that ChatGPT demonstrated remarkable fluency in content generation, though the creative output was average. The random nature of AI creativity and the dependency on the richness of the training database require a reassessment of traditional creativity metrics, especially for AI. Our findings highlight the integral role humans play in guiding AI to foster genuine originality, suggesting the need for future research in human-AI co-creation and the development of robust AI creativity measurement mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12120125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined generative artificial intelligences (GenAIs), as popularized by ChatGPT, in standardized creativity tests. Benchmarking GenAI against human performance, the results showed that ChatGPT demonstrated remarkable fluency in content generation, though the creative output was average. The random nature of AI creativity and the dependency on the richness of the training database require a reassessment of traditional creativity metrics, especially for AI. Our findings highlight the integral role humans play in guiding AI to foster genuine originality, suggesting the need for future research in human-AI co-creation and the development of robust AI creativity measurement mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叙事任务中的创造性:探索创造性的新形式。
这项研究在标准化创造力测试中考察了由ChatGPT推广的生成式人工智能(GenAIs)。将GenAI与人类的表现进行对比,结果表明,ChatGPT在内容生成方面表现出了非凡的流畅性,尽管创意输出一般。人工智能创造力的随机性和对训练数据库丰富性的依赖要求对传统的创造力指标进行重新评估,尤其是对人工智能而言。我们的研究结果强调了人类在引导人工智能培养真正的原创性方面发挥的不可或缺的作用,这表明未来需要研究人类与人工智能的共同创造,并开发强大的人工智能创造力衡量机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Embedding-Based Semantic Analysis Approach: A Preliminary Study on Redundancy Detection in Psychological Concepts Operationalized by Scales. Development and Validation of a Game-Based Assessment for Complex Problem Solving. Teachers' and Parents' Assessments of Primary School Children's Intellectual Investment as Predictors of Change in Need for Cognition. Teachers' Growth Mindset, Perceived School Climate, and Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Moderate the Relationship Between Students' Growth Mindset and Academic Achievement. Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1