Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s10198-024-01744-5
Maura Leusder, Hilco J van Elten, Kees Ahaus, Carina G J M Hilders, Evert J P van Santbrink
{"title":"Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.","authors":"Maura Leusder, Hilco J van Elten, Kees Ahaus, Carina G J M Hilders, Evert J P van Santbrink","doi":"10.1007/s10198-024-01744-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health economic evaluations require cost data as a key input, and reimbursement policies and systems should incentivize valuable care. Subfertility is a growing global phenomenon, and Dutch per-treatment DRGs alone do not support value-based decision-making because they don't reflect patient-level variation or the impact of technologies on costs across entire patient pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a real-world micro-costing analysis of subfertility patient pathways (n = 4.190) using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and process mining in the Dutch healthcare system, and built a scalable and granular costing model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that pathways (13.203 treatments, 4.190 patients, 10 years) from referral to pregnancy and birth vary greatly in costs (mean €6.329, maximum €36.976) and duration (mean 25,5 months, maximum 8,59 years), with structural variation within treatments (and DRGs) of up to 65%. Patient-level variation is highest in laboratory phases, and causally related to patients' cycle volume, type, and treatment methods. Large IVF or IVF-ICSI cycles are most common, and most valuable to patients and the healthcare system, but exceed their DRGs significantly (33%). We provide recommendations that reduce costs across patient pathways by €1.3 m in the Netherlands, to support value-based personalized care strategies. These findings are relevant to clinics following European protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility treatments like IVF feature significant cost variation due to the personalization of treatments, and rapidly evolving laboratory technologies. Incorporating cost granularity at the patient and treatment level (cycle volume, type, method) is critical for decision-making, economic analyses, and policy as both subfertility rates and treatment demand are rising.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01744-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health economic evaluations require cost data as a key input, and reimbursement policies and systems should incentivize valuable care. Subfertility is a growing global phenomenon, and Dutch per-treatment DRGs alone do not support value-based decision-making because they don't reflect patient-level variation or the impact of technologies on costs across entire patient pathways.

Methods: We present a real-world micro-costing analysis of subfertility patient pathways (n = 4.190) using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and process mining in the Dutch healthcare system, and built a scalable and granular costing model.

Results: We find that pathways (13.203 treatments, 4.190 patients, 10 years) from referral to pregnancy and birth vary greatly in costs (mean €6.329, maximum €36.976) and duration (mean 25,5 months, maximum 8,59 years), with structural variation within treatments (and DRGs) of up to 65%. Patient-level variation is highest in laboratory phases, and causally related to patients' cycle volume, type, and treatment methods. Large IVF or IVF-ICSI cycles are most common, and most valuable to patients and the healthcare system, but exceed their DRGs significantly (33%). We provide recommendations that reduce costs across patient pathways by €1.3 m in the Netherlands, to support value-based personalized care strategies. These findings are relevant to clinics following European protocols.

Conclusions: Fertility treatments like IVF feature significant cost variation due to the personalization of treatments, and rapidly evolving laboratory technologies. Incorporating cost granularity at the patient and treatment level (cycle volume, type, method) is critical for decision-making, economic analyses, and policy as both subfertility rates and treatment demand are rising.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰医疗保健系统中低生育能力途径的患者水平成本分析。
背景:卫生经济评估需要成本数据作为关键输入,报销政策和制度应该激励有价值的护理。不孕不育是一个日益增长的全球现象,荷兰的每次治疗DRGs本身并不能支持基于价值的决策,因为它们不能反映患者水平的变化,也不能反映技术对整个患者途径成本的影响。方法:我们在荷兰医疗保健系统中使用时间驱动的基于作业的成本(TDABC)和流程挖掘对低生育能力患者路径(n = 4.190)进行了现实世界的微观成本分析,并建立了一个可扩展的颗粒成本模型。结果:我们发现从转诊到妊娠和分娩的途径(13.203种治疗,4.190例患者,10年)在费用(平均6.329欧元,最高36.976欧元)和持续时间(平均25.5个月,最高8.59年)方面差异很大,治疗(和DRGs)的结构差异高达65%。患者水平差异在实验室阶段最高,与患者周期量、类型和治疗方法有因果关系。较大的IVF或IVF- icsi周期是最常见的,对患者和医疗保健系统最有价值,但显著超过其DRGs(33%)。我们提供建议,在荷兰减少130万欧元的患者路径成本,以支持基于价值的个性化护理策略。这些发现与遵循欧洲协议的诊所有关。结论:由于治疗的个性化和实验室技术的快速发展,IVF等生育治疗具有显著的成本差异。由于低生育率和治疗需求都在上升,在患者和治疗层面(周期量、类型、方法)纳入成本粒度对于决策、经济分析和政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Changes in disposable income of Polish households and growing trends in alcohol mortality. Explaining variations in government health expenditure: evidence from Canada. The impact of different perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for patients with heart failure in different European countries. Is there a link between health care utilisation and subjective well-being? An exploratory study among older Danes. Costs associated with insufficient physical activity in Germany: cross-sectional results from the baseline examination of the German national cohort (NAKO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1