Highs and Lows of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetry and Clinical Outcomes.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.002
Dawn Owen, W Scott Harmsen, Safia K Ahmed, Ivy A Petersen, Michael G Haddock, Daniel J Ma, Sydney Pulsipher, Kimberly S Corbin, Scott C Lester, Sean S Park, Christopher L Deufel, James A Kavanaugh, Michael P Grams
{"title":"Highs and Lows of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetry and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Dawn Owen, W Scott Harmsen, Safia K Ahmed, Ivy A Petersen, Michael G Haddock, Daniel J Ma, Sydney Pulsipher, Kimberly S Corbin, Scott C Lester, Sean S Park, Christopher L Deufel, James A Kavanaugh, Michael P Grams","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) intentionally delivers a heterogeneous dose distribution characterized by alternating regions of high and low doses throughout a tumor. This modality may enhance response to subsequent whole tumor radiation in bulky and radioresistant lesions that are historically less responsive to conventional radiation doses alone. The current study presents a single institution experience with modern era SFRT using predominantly a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated with SFRT between 10/2019 and 6/2022 were included for analysis. Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and dosimetric parameters were collected retrospectively as part of an institutional review board approved registry and protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to collate patient data and Kaplan Meier analysis were generated for overall survival and local control. Univariate analyses were used to investigate factors associated with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 176 patients with 186 sites treated were included. Median age was 64 and the most commonly treated histologies were non-small cell lung cancer and sarcoma. The most common SFRT dose was 20 Gy in 1 fraction with 88% of patients receiving follow-up whole tumor radiotherapy to a median EQD2 dose of 32.5 Gy (=10). Median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 480.5 cc (7.8-10,897.8). Median follow-up was 322 days with 1 year overall survival 37% and 1 year local control 81%. Local control was available in 138 treated sites (131 patients. SFRT factors including dose to 10% (D10%), dose to 90% (D90%), equivalent uniform dose, and mean dose were highly predictive of local control. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 9 patients. All of these patients received follow-up whole tumor radiation and at least two of these were attributable to unexpected rapid regression of tumor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SFRT is a promising technique that appears to confer good local control across a disparate group of patients with bulky and radioresistant tumors. Dosimetric parameters of SFRT treatment plans may be independent predictors of local control. Further investigation is warranted as are prospective trials to evaluate the role of SFRT in both the palliative and definitive setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) intentionally delivers a heterogeneous dose distribution characterized by alternating regions of high and low doses throughout a tumor. This modality may enhance response to subsequent whole tumor radiation in bulky and radioresistant lesions that are historically less responsive to conventional radiation doses alone. The current study presents a single institution experience with modern era SFRT using predominantly a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice technique.

Methods: Patients treated with SFRT between 10/2019 and 6/2022 were included for analysis. Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and dosimetric parameters were collected retrospectively as part of an institutional review board approved registry and protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to collate patient data and Kaplan Meier analysis were generated for overall survival and local control. Univariate analyses were used to investigate factors associated with outcomes.

Results: A total of 176 patients with 186 sites treated were included. Median age was 64 and the most commonly treated histologies were non-small cell lung cancer and sarcoma. The most common SFRT dose was 20 Gy in 1 fraction with 88% of patients receiving follow-up whole tumor radiotherapy to a median EQD2 dose of 32.5 Gy (=10). Median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 480.5 cc (7.8-10,897.8). Median follow-up was 322 days with 1 year overall survival 37% and 1 year local control 81%. Local control was available in 138 treated sites (131 patients. SFRT factors including dose to 10% (D10%), dose to 90% (D90%), equivalent uniform dose, and mean dose were highly predictive of local control. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 9 patients. All of these patients received follow-up whole tumor radiation and at least two of these were attributable to unexpected rapid regression of tumor.

Conclusions: SFRT is a promising technique that appears to confer good local control across a disparate group of patients with bulky and radioresistant tumors. Dosimetric parameters of SFRT treatment plans may be independent predictors of local control. Further investigation is warranted as are prospective trials to evaluate the role of SFRT in both the palliative and definitive setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间分割放射治疗的高低:剂量学和临床结果。
目的:空间分割放射治疗(SFRT)有意提供一种不均匀的剂量分布,其特征是在整个肿瘤中高剂量和低剂量交替区域。这种方式可以增强对随后的全肿瘤放疗的应答,对于以往仅对常规辐射剂量反应较弱的大体积和放射耐药病变。目前的研究介绍了现代SFRT的单一机构经验,主要使用体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)晶格技术。方法:纳入2019年10月至2022年6月期间接受SFRT治疗的患者进行分析。回顾性收集患者特征、肿瘤特征和剂量学参数,作为机构审查委员会批准的登记和方案的一部分。描述性统计用于整理患者资料,Kaplan Meier分析用于总体生存和局部控制。单变量分析用于调查与结果相关的因素。结果:共纳入176例患者,治疗部位186个。中位年龄为64岁,最常治疗的组织学为非小细胞肺癌和肉瘤。最常见的SFRT剂量为20 Gy / 1次,88%的患者接受随访全肿瘤放疗,EQD2中位剂量为32.5 Gy (α/β=10)。中位总肿瘤体积(GTV)为480.5 cc(7.8- 10897.8)。中位随访为322天,1年总生存率为37%,1年局部对照为81%。138个治疗点(131例患者)可获得局部控制。SFRT因子包括剂量至10% (D10%)、剂量至90% (D90%)、等效均匀剂量和平均剂量高度预测局部控制。9例患者出现3级毒性。所有这些患者都接受了随访的全肿瘤放射治疗,其中至少有两例患者可归因于肿瘤意想不到的快速消退。结论:SFRT是一种很有前途的技术,似乎可以对不同组的肿瘤患者进行良好的局部控制。SFRT治疗方案的剂量学参数可能是局部控制的独立预测因子。有必要进行进一步的调查,并进行前瞻性试验,以评估SFRT在姑息治疗和最终治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Variations in radiotherapy delineation of the lateral compartments in patients with rectal cancer: results after an updated national guideline. The Impact of Margin Expansions on Local Control and Radionecrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ONLINE ADAPTIVE FIVE-FRACTION ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER USING A CONVENTIONAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR. Radiation Reflection Rounds: A Departmental Initiative for Staff Well-being. Neoadjuvant SBRT plus Elective Nodal Irradiation with Concurrent Capecitabine for Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Survival Analysis of a Prospective Phase 1 Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1