Perceptions of Provider Inquiry Regarding Housing Status Among Pregnant Women Experiencing Housing Instability.

Kelley N Robinson, Ashley Gresh, Crystal Trent-Paultre, Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha
{"title":"Perceptions of Provider Inquiry Regarding Housing Status Among Pregnant Women Experiencing Housing Instability.","authors":"Kelley N Robinson, Ashley Gresh, Crystal Trent-Paultre, Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and describe perceptions of provider inquiry regarding housing status among pregnant women experiencing housing instability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary qualitative analysis using analytic expansion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In-person and online interviews in the Mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking women who were pregnant or gave birth within the past year, were 18 years or older, and were experiencing housing instability (N = 14).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a secondary analysis of primary data collected via semistructured interviews in the mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region between February 2020 and December 2021. These data were part of a primary study in which we explored the effect of housing and health during pregnancy and the postpartum period, barriers and facilitators to health care, and social support. In this secondary analysis, we used reflexive thematic analyses to interpret interpretations and discover themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants answered the question regarding provider inquiry. Nine participants (64%) expressed no inquiry about their housing status and reported that visits were too short or focused more on fetal health. Many participants shared that they received limited provider support with housing challenges. Disclosing housing status depended on the patient-provider relationship and belief in the provider's ability to help and support. Three overarching themes emerged: Provider Inquiry About Housing, The Value of Relationships, and Improving Access to Housing Support and Services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current service delivery model for pregnant women does not adequately address social determinants of health. Future researchers should focus on the intersection of pregnancy and housing instability to determine whether restructuring of policy and practice is needed. Nurse-midwives and other maternity care providers can be key points of contact in facilitating housing support for pregnant women with unstable housing status.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore and describe perceptions of provider inquiry regarding housing status among pregnant women experiencing housing instability.

Design: Secondary qualitative analysis using analytic expansion.

Setting: In-person and online interviews in the Mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region.

Participants: English-speaking women who were pregnant or gave birth within the past year, were 18 years or older, and were experiencing housing instability (N = 14).

Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of primary data collected via semistructured interviews in the mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region between February 2020 and December 2021. These data were part of a primary study in which we explored the effect of housing and health during pregnancy and the postpartum period, barriers and facilitators to health care, and social support. In this secondary analysis, we used reflexive thematic analyses to interpret interpretations and discover themes.

Results: Fourteen participants answered the question regarding provider inquiry. Nine participants (64%) expressed no inquiry about their housing status and reported that visits were too short or focused more on fetal health. Many participants shared that they received limited provider support with housing challenges. Disclosing housing status depended on the patient-provider relationship and belief in the provider's ability to help and support. Three overarching themes emerged: Provider Inquiry About Housing, The Value of Relationships, and Improving Access to Housing Support and Services.

Conclusion: The current service delivery model for pregnant women does not adequately address social determinants of health. Future researchers should focus on the intersection of pregnancy and housing instability to determine whether restructuring of policy and practice is needed. Nurse-midwives and other maternity care providers can be key points of contact in facilitating housing support for pregnant women with unstable housing status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Women in Opioid Recovery Regarding Policies and Laws on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Relationships Among Endorsement of the Superwoman Schema and Health Outcomes. Associations Among Lifetime Discrimination Typologies and Psychological Health in Black and Hispanic Women After Birth. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1