Perceptions of Provider Inquiry Regarding Housing Status Among Pregnant Women Experiencing Housing Instability.

Kelley N Robinson, Ashley Gresh, Crystal Trent-Paultre, Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha
{"title":"Perceptions of Provider Inquiry Regarding Housing Status Among Pregnant Women Experiencing Housing Instability.","authors":"Kelley N Robinson, Ashley Gresh, Crystal Trent-Paultre, Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and describe perceptions of provider inquiry regarding housing status among pregnant women experiencing housing instability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary qualitative analysis using analytic expansion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In-person and online interviews in the Mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking women who were pregnant or gave birth within the past year, 18 years or older, and experiencing housing instability (N = 14).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a secondary analysis of primary data collected via semistructured interviews in the mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region between February 2020 and December 2021. In this secondary analysis, we used reflexive thematic analyses to interpret data and discover themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants answered the question regarding provider inquiry. Nine participants (64%) expressed no inquiry about their housing status and reported that visits were too short or focused more on fetal health. Disclosing housing status depended on the patient-provider relationship and belief in the provider's ability to help and support. Three overarching themes emerged: Provider Inquiry About Housing, The Value of Relationships, and Improving Access to Housing Support and Services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current service delivery model for pregnant women does not adequately address social determinants of health. Future researchers should focus on the intersection of pregnancy and housing instability to determine whether restructuring of policy and practice is needed. Nurse-midwives and other maternity care providers can be key points of contact in facilitating housing support for pregnant women with unstable housing status.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore and describe perceptions of provider inquiry regarding housing status among pregnant women experiencing housing instability.

Design: Secondary qualitative analysis using analytic expansion.

Setting: In-person and online interviews in the Mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region.

Participants: English-speaking women who were pregnant or gave birth within the past year, 18 years or older, and experiencing housing instability (N = 14).

Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of primary data collected via semistructured interviews in the mid-Atlantic and Washington, DC, region between February 2020 and December 2021. In this secondary analysis, we used reflexive thematic analyses to interpret data and discover themes.

Results: Fourteen participants answered the question regarding provider inquiry. Nine participants (64%) expressed no inquiry about their housing status and reported that visits were too short or focused more on fetal health. Disclosing housing status depended on the patient-provider relationship and belief in the provider's ability to help and support. Three overarching themes emerged: Provider Inquiry About Housing, The Value of Relationships, and Improving Access to Housing Support and Services.

Conclusion: The current service delivery model for pregnant women does not adequately address social determinants of health. Future researchers should focus on the intersection of pregnancy and housing instability to determine whether restructuring of policy and practice is needed. Nurse-midwives and other maternity care providers can be key points of contact in facilitating housing support for pregnant women with unstable housing status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在经历住房不稳定的孕妇中,提供者询问住房状况的看法。
目的:探讨和描述在经历住房不稳定的孕妇中对提供者询问住房状况的看法。设计:采用分析展开法进行二次定性分析。环境:在大西洋中部和华盛顿特区进行面对面和在线访谈。参与者:在过去一年内怀孕或分娩的英语女性,18岁或以上,并且正在经历住房不稳定(N = 14)。方法:我们对2020年2月至2021年12月期间在大西洋中部和华盛顿特区地区通过半结构化访谈收集的主要数据进行了二次分析。这些数据是一项初步研究的一部分,在这项研究中,我们探讨了住房与怀孕和产后期间健康的影响、保健的障碍和促进因素以及社会支持。在这个二次分析中,我们使用反身性主位分析来解释解释和发现主题。结果:14名参与者回答了关于供应商询问的问题。9名参与者(64%)表示没有询问他们的住房状况,并报告说就诊时间太短或更多地关注胎儿健康。许多与会者表示,他们在住房挑战方面得到的提供者支持有限。披露住房状况取决于医患关系和对医患提供帮助和支持能力的信任。出现了三个主要主题:关于住房的提供者调查,关系的价值,以及改善获得住房支持和服务的机会。结论:目前为孕妇提供的服务模式没有充分解决健康的社会决定因素。未来的研究人员应该关注怀孕和住房不稳定的交集,以确定是否需要调整政策和实践。护士-助产士和其他产科护理提供者可成为促进住房状况不稳定的孕妇获得住房支助的关键联络点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Call to Action to Quantify Non-Severe and Severe Maternal Morbidity. Ventilatory Assistance Before Umbilical Cord Clamping in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Barriers to Diagnosis and Innovations in Care for Endometriosis. Nursing Safety on the Job: Workplace Violence and Personal Protection. Qualitative Study of Experiences with an Interprofessional Perinatal Care Team Among Women Who Used Substances During the Perinatal Period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1