Recommendations on supporting neonatology healthcare givers from the French National Society

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/apa.17557
Claire Zores, Marie Touzet, Laurence Girard, Laurence Caeymaex, Pierre Kuhn, Frederique Berne-Audeoud, Elodie Zana-Taïeb, the GREEN study group of the French Neonatal Society
{"title":"Recommendations on supporting neonatology healthcare givers from the French National Society","authors":"Claire Zores,&nbsp;Marie Touzet,&nbsp;Laurence Girard,&nbsp;Laurence Caeymaex,&nbsp;Pierre Kuhn,&nbsp;Frederique Berne-Audeoud,&nbsp;Elodie Zana-Taïeb,&nbsp;the GREEN study group of the French Neonatal Society","doi":"10.1111/apa.17557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare givers are exposed to stress and therefore are at risk of the development of pathologies. We aimed to provide recommendations regarding psychosocial risks such as stress, moral distress, burnout syndrome or secondary stress syndrome in neonatal care units to best support neonatal healthcare givers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2017 to 1 December 2023 by using the keywords burnout OR (moral and distress) AND neonatal unit. Recommendations were developed after internal and external review by a multidisciplinary group including 15 professionals and parent representatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 207 studies and developed 15 recommendations based on 118 eligible studies. Recommendations to support neonatology healthcare givers were developed for the individual level, the collective or department level to organise the environment, the training of the team with communication sessions and team cohesion; and the institutional level to respect and organise working time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Psychosocial risks have consequences for the neonatal healthcare givers themselves and possibly those being cared for. To date, prevention, screening and treatment have been insufficiently developed and explored. In this context, an overall institutional review of the chosen care model is needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"114 3","pages":"487-497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.17557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Healthcare givers are exposed to stress and therefore are at risk of the development of pathologies. We aimed to provide recommendations regarding psychosocial risks such as stress, moral distress, burnout syndrome or secondary stress syndrome in neonatal care units to best support neonatal healthcare givers.

Methods

We searched PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2017 to 1 December 2023 by using the keywords burnout OR (moral and distress) AND neonatal unit. Recommendations were developed after internal and external review by a multidisciplinary group including 15 professionals and parent representatives.

Results

We identified 207 studies and developed 15 recommendations based on 118 eligible studies. Recommendations to support neonatology healthcare givers were developed for the individual level, the collective or department level to organise the environment, the training of the team with communication sessions and team cohesion; and the institutional level to respect and organise working time.

Conclusion

Psychosocial risks have consequences for the neonatal healthcare givers themselves and possibly those being cared for. To date, prevention, screening and treatment have been insufficiently developed and explored. In this context, an overall institutional review of the chosen care model is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于支持新生儿保健提供者的建议来自法国国家协会。
目的:医疗保健提供者暴露于压力,因此是在病理发展的风险。我们的目的是提供建议关于心理社会风险,如压力,道德困扰,倦怠综合征或继发性压力综合征在新生儿护理单位,以最好地支持新生儿医护人员。方法:检索PubMed检索2017年1月1日至2023年12月1日发表的论文,检索关键词为倦怠OR (moral and distress)和新生儿病房。由15名专业人员和家长代表组成的多学科小组在内部和外部审查后制定了建议。结果:我们确定了207项研究,并根据118项符合条件的研究提出了15项建议。在个人、集体或部门层面制定了支持新生儿保健提供者的建议,以组织环境,通过沟通会议和团队凝聚力培训团队;制度层面尊重和组织工作时间。结论:心理社会风险对新生儿医护人员本身和可能被照顾者都有影响。迄今为止,预防、筛查和治疗尚未得到充分发展和探索。在这种情况下,需要对所选择的护理模式进行全面的机构审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses to Daily Activities in Children: Examining Sex Differences and Weight Categories. Association Between Prenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Infant Wheeze Outcomes. Implementation of Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir for Children Aged 3-12 Years With Chronic Hepatitis C: Multicentre Israeli Experience. Corrigendum to 'Optimal Breastfeeding Practices and Infant and Child Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Versus Intubate-Surfactant-Extubate: Associated With Reduced Mechanical Ventilation in Extremely Preterm Infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1